Melania Trump has voiced strong support for abortion rights in her upcoming memoir, taking a stance that sharply contrasts with her husband, former US president Donald Trump, on a divisive US election issue.
US Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign on Thursday reacted quickly to the former first lady’s unexpected revelation ahead of the Nov. 5 vote.
According to book extracts, Melania Trump wrote that it is “imperative to guarantee that women have autonomy in deciding their preference of having children, based on their own convictions, free from any intervention or pressure from the government.”
Photo: Reuters
The former first lady’s opinion diverges from that of her husband, who often brags that his picks of justices for the US Supreme Court paved the way for the overturning of Roe v Wade, and the end of the national right to abortion.
Since that 2022 court ruling, at least 20 US states have brought in full or partial restrictions, with Georgia banning most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
Abortion is a major issue for voters in the tight presidential election race, and the Harris campaign jumped on the apparent disconnect.
“Sadly for the women across America, Mrs Trump’s husband firmly disagrees with her and is the reason that more than one in three American women live under a Trump abortion ban that threatens their health, their freedom and their lives,” Harris campaign spokesperson Sarafina Chitika said. “Donald Trump has made it abundantly clear: If he wins in November, he will ban abortion nationwide, punish women and restrict women’s access to reproductive healthcare.”
Donald Trump told Fox News on Thursday that opinions on abortion differ across the nation and he had encouraged his wife to express herself honestly.
“We spoke about it, and I said: ‘You have to write what you believe. I’m not going to tell you what to do. You have to write what you believe,’” he told the network at a rally in Saginaw, Michigan. “There are some people that are very, very far right on the issue, meaning, without exceptions, and then there are other people that view it a little bit differently than that.”
According to the Guardian, which said it had obtained a copy of the memoir ahead of its publication next week, Melania Trump wrote that “restricting a woman’s right to choose whether to terminate an unwanted pregnancy is the same as denying her control over her own body.”
Melania Trump, who has been barely seen on the campaign trail as her husband seeks a White House comeback, also posted a slick black-and-white video on social media, although she did not mention abortion directly.
“Individual freedom is a fundamental principle that I safeguard. Without a doubt there is no room for compromise when it comes to this essential right that all women possess from birth,” she said, backed by the strains of sweeping classical music.
Her statements triggered fury from anti-abortion activists.
“It’s hard to follow the logic of putting out the former first lady’s book right before the election undercutting President Trump’s message to pro-life voters,” Kristan Hawkins of Students for Life of America wrote on social media. “Abortion ends an innocent life and is the opposite of empowerment.”
Other former Republican first ladies Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush and Laura Bush also took a pro-choice position on abortion, although after leaving the White House.
POLITICAL PRISONERS VS DEPORTEES: Venezuela’s prosecutor’s office slammed the call by El Salvador’s leader, accusing him of crimes against humanity Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele on Sunday proposed carrying out a prisoner swap with Venezuela, suggesting he would exchange Venezuelan deportees from the US his government has kept imprisoned for what he called “political prisoners” in Venezuela. In a post on X, directed at Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Bukele listed off a number of family members of high-level opposition figures in Venezuela, journalists and activists detained during the South American government’s electoral crackdown last year. “The only reason they are imprisoned is for having opposed you and your electoral fraud,” he wrote to Maduro. “However, I want to propose a humanitarian agreement that
ECONOMIC WORRIES: The ruling PAP faces voters amid concerns that the city-state faces the possibility of a recession and job losses amid Washington’s tariffs Singapore yesterday finalized contestants for its general election on Saturday next week, with the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) fielding 32 new candidates in the biggest refresh of the party that has ruled the city-state since independence in 1965. The move follows a pledge by Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財), who took office last year and assumed the PAP leadership, to “bring in new blood, new ideas and new energy” to steer the country of 6 million people. His latest shake-up beats that of predecessors Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) and Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟), who replaced 24 and 11 politicians respectively
Young women standing idly around a park in Tokyo’s west suggest that a giant statue of Godzilla is not the only attraction for a record number of foreign tourists. Their faces lit by the cold glow of their phones, the women lining Okubo Park are evidence that sex tourism has developed as a dark flipside to the bustling Kabukicho nightlife district. Increasing numbers of foreign men are flocking to the area after seeing videos on social media. One of the women said that the area near Kabukicho, where Godzilla rumbles and belches smoke atop a cinema, has become a “real
‘WATER WARFARE’: A Pakistani official called India’s suspension of a 65-year-old treaty on the sharing of waters from the Indus River ‘a cowardly, illegal move’ Pakistan yesterday canceled visas for Indian nationals, closed its airspace for all Indian-owned or operated airlines, and suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third country. The retaliatory measures follow India’s decision to suspend visas for Pakistani nationals in the aftermath of a deadly attack by shooters in Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The rare attack on civilians shocked and outraged India and prompted calls for action against their country’s archenemy, Pakistan. New Delhi did not publicly produce evidence connecting the attack to its neighbor, but said it had “cross-border” links to Pakistan. Pakistan denied any connection to