Dockworkers have walked out of every major port on the US east and Gulf coasts, marking the beginning of a strike that could ripple through the world’s largest economy and cause political turmoil just weeks before the US presidential election.
The affected ports have the combined capacity to handle as much as half of all US trade volumes, and the strike would halt container cargo and auto shipments. Energy supplies and bulk cargo would not be affected. Some exceptions would be made to allow for the movement of military goods and cruise ships.
The significance of a work stoppage at every major container port from Houston to Miami and New York-New Jersey depends on how long the strike lasts. The economic loss from the shutdown, which began at 12:01 yesterday morning Eastern Standard Time, would be between US$3.8 billion and US$4.5 billion a day, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Photo: Bloomberg
A backup resulting from a week-long strike would take about a month to clear, Grace Zwemmer at Oxford Economics said.
The International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) is seeking higher wages and a rollback of the language on automation in six-year contract that expired at midnight.
Union leader Harold Daggett has for months threatened a strike starting yesterday if no deal is reached before the deadline. The last time east and Gulf coast dockworkers went on strike was in 1977.
“We are prepared to fight as long as necessary, to stay out on strike for whatever period of time it takes,” Daggett said in a statement on Facebook.
The last offer from the companies “fell far short of what ILA rank-and-file members are demanding in wages and protections against automation,” he wrote.
The ocean carriers and terminal operators represented by the US Maritime Alliance have accused the ILA of refusing to negotiate since the union called off talks back in June. A strike was all but certain until Monday afternoon, when reports emerged that the White House has been in communication with the two sides over the weekend and some progress has been made on wages.
US President Joe Biden, who prides himself on being pro-union, has said the dispute is a matter for collective bargaining and he would not invoke his authority under national security laws to order dockworkers back to the ports while negotiations continue.
Trade, transportation and retail industry groups have been urging the White House to intervene to prevent or stop a strike.
“It would be unconscionable to allow a contract dispute to inflict such a shock to our economy,” US Chamber of Commerce CEO Suzanne Clark wrote in a letter to Biden on Monday.
“Taft-Hartley would provide time for both parties in negotiation to reach a deal on a new labor contract,” Clark wrote, referring to the 1947 congressional act that allows a president to intervene in labor disputes that involved national security.
Daggett has warned the White House not to intervene, and said if forced back to the ports, dockworkers would handle fewer containers than usual, slowing operations.
The union has not endorsed a presidential candidate, although according to Daggett, former US pesident Donald Trump “promised to support the ILA in its opposition to automated terminals” during a Mar-a-Lago meeting last fall.
Neither Trump nor US Vice President Kamala Harris has drawn public attention to the strike threat.
The flow of goods has already been impacted by the threat of disruption. Many importers brought their goods in early or through west coast ports to mitigate the risk. Port terminals up and down the coasts have been winding down operations ahead of the midnight deadline, and railroads are also pulling back service.
“The most important thing is going to be for the carriers, shippers and workers to come to terms,” US Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg on Bloomberg Television’s Balance of Power. “There’s really no substitute for the ports being up and running.”
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Chinese authorities said they began live-fire exercises in the Gulf of Tonkin on Monday, only days after Vietnam announced a new line marking what it considers its territory in the body of water between the nations. The Chinese Maritime Safety Administration said the exercises would be focused on the Beibu Gulf area, closer to the Chinese side of the Gulf of Tonkin, and would run until tomorrow evening. It gave no further details, but the drills follow an announcement last week by Vietnam establishing a baseline used to calculate the width of its territorial waters in the Gulf of Tonkin. State-run Vietnam News
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
Four decades after they were forced apart, US-raised Adamary Garcia and her birth mother on Saturday fell into each other’s arms at the airport in Santiago, Chile. Without speaking, they embraced tearfully: A rare reunification for one the thousands of Chileans taken from their mothers as babies and given up for adoption abroad. “The worst is over,” Edita Bizama, 64, said as she beheld her daughter for the first time since her birth 41 years ago. Garcia had flown to Santiago with four other women born in Chile and adopted in the US. Reports have estimated there were 20,000 such cases from 1950 to
RSS