The federal judge presiding over the election subversion case against former US president Donald Trump on Saturday rejected a defense effort to dismiss the indictment on claims that he was prosecuted for vindictive and political purposes.
The ruling from US District Judge Tanya Chutkan is the first substantive order since the case was returned to her on Friday following a landmark US Supreme Court opinion last month that conferred broad immunity for former presidents and narrowed special counsel Jack Smith’s case against Trump.
In their motion to dismiss the indictment, defense lawyers said that Trump was mistreated because he was prosecuted even though others who have challenged election results have avoided criminal charges.
Photo: Reuters
Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, also said that US President Joe Biden and the US Department of Justice launched a prosecution to prevent him from being re-elected.
However, Chutkan rejected both arguments, saying that Trump was not charged simply for challenging election results, but instead for “knowingly making false statements in furtherance of criminal conspiracies and for obstruction of election certification proceedings.”
She also said that his lawyers had misread news media articles that they had cited in arguing that the prosecution was political in nature.
“After reviewing Defendant’s evidence and arguments, the court cannot conclude that he has carried his burden to establish either actual vindictiveness or the presumption of it, and so finds no basis for dismissing this case on those grounds,” Chutkan wrote in her order.
Also on Saturday, she scheduled an Aug. 16 status conference to discuss next steps in the case.
The four-count indictment, brought in August last year, accuses Trump of conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 election he lost to Biden through a number of schemes, including by badgering then-US vice president Mike Pence to block the formal certification of electoral votes.
Trump’s lawyers said that he was immune from prosecution as a former president, and the case has been on hold since December as his appeal worked its way through the courts.
Airlines in Australia, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia and Singapore yesterday canceled flights to and from the Indonesian island of Bali, after a nearby volcano catapulted an ash tower into the sky. Australia’s Jetstar, Qantas and Virgin Australia all grounded flights after Mount Lewotobi Laki-Laki on Flores island spewed a 9km tower a day earlier. Malaysia Airlines, AirAsia, India’s IndiGo and Singapore’s Scoot also listed flights as canceled. “Volcanic ash poses a significant threat to safe operations of the aircraft in the vicinity of volcanic clouds,” AirAsia said as it announced several cancelations. Multiple eruptions from the 1,703m twin-peaked volcano in
China has built a land-based prototype nuclear reactor for a large surface warship, in the clearest sign yet Beijing is advancing toward producing the nation’s first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, according to a new analysis of satellite imagery and Chinese government documents provided to The Associated Press. There have long been rumors that China is planning to build a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, but the research by the Middlebury Institute of International Studies in California is the first to confirm it is working on a nuclear-powered propulsion system for a carrier-sized surface warship. Why is China’s pursuit of nuclear-powered carriers significant? China’s navy is already
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) launched a week-long diplomatic blitz of South America on Thursday by inaugurating a massive deep-water port in Peru, a US$1.3 billion investment by Beijing as it seeks to expand trade and influence on the continent. With China’s demand for agricultural goods and metals from Latin America growing, Xi will participate in the APEC summit in Lima then head to the Group of 20 summit in Rio de Janeiro next week, where he will also make a state visit to Brazil. Xi and Peruvian President Dina Boluarte participated on Thursday by video link in the opening
IT’S A DEAL? Including the phrase ‘overlapping claims’ in a Chinese-Indonesian joint statement over the weekend puts Jakarta’s national interests at risk, critics say Indonesia yesterday said it does not recognize China’s claims over the South China Sea, despite signing a maritime development deal with Beijing, as some analysts warned the pact risked compromising its sovereign rights. Beijing has long clashed with Southeast Asian neighbors over the South China Sea, which it claims almost in its entirety, based on a “nine-dash line” on its maps that cuts into the exclusive economic zones (EEZ) of several countries. Joint agreements with China in the strategic waterway have been sensitive for years, with some nations wary of deals they fear could be interpreted as legitimizing Beijing’s vast claims. In 2016,