A case in which former US president Donald Trump has been accused of election interference was put on hold on Wednesday after US District Judge Tanya Chutkan granted him a pause as he pursues claims that he is immune from prosecution.
The decision increases the likelihood that the trial, currently scheduled for March 4, will be postponed as the appeal winds through the courts.
Shortly after Chutkan’s ruling, the federal appeals court in Washington granted a request by prosecutors to expedite consideration of Trump’s appeal.
Photo: Bloomberg
The appeals court set deadlines for briefs to be filed between Saturday next week and Jan. 2, but has not yet scheduled a date for arguments.
A ruling in Trump’s favor would likely derail the case and a protracted appeal could result in a significant postponement of the proceedings, including until potentially after next year’s US presidential election.
Chutkan’s three-page order is the latest volley in a simmering dispute over the scope of presidential power that has the potential to be decided by the US Supreme Court for the first time in US history.
Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung called the judge’s decision to pause the case “a big win for president Trump and our rule of law.”
“The constitution should not be suspended in a baseless prosecution against the leading candidate for president,” Cheung said.
After Chutkan this month turned aside Trump’s claims that he was shielded from prosecution for actions he took while fulfilling his duties as president, his lawyers asked the appeals court to review the decision and urged the judge to freeze the case in the meantime.
However, special counsel Jack Smith sought to leapfrog the appeals court by asking the Supreme Court on Monday to fast-track an opinion on the immunity question that would permit the prosecution to proceed.
The Supreme Court indicated that it would decide quickly whether to take the case up, ordering Trump’s lawyers to respond by Dec. 20, but it did not signal what it would ultimately do.
However, it said it would review a charge of obstruction of an official proceeding that has been brought against more than 300 participants in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol, which would potentially also apply to Trump.
Joseph Fischer, a former police officer who is among more than 300 people charged with obstruction at the riot at the US Capitol, has sought to get the charge dismissed, with a knock-on effect for all the cases — including Trump’s.
A conviction under that charge would carry a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.
A District Court judge agreed to throw out the obstruction charge on the grounds that the law was intended to prosecute financial crimes following the Enron scandal and did not apply to Fischer’s conduct on Jan. 6, 2021.
That ruling was reversed by an appeals court.
The Supreme Court is to hear Fischer’s appeal next year and is expected to issue a ruling by the end of its term in June — about four months before the Nov. 4 presidential election in which Trump is expected to face US President Joe Biden again.
The argument that Trump is immune from prosecution has for months been seen as perhaps the most weighty and legally consequential objection made by his lawyers ahead of trial.
No former US president has ever been prosecuted before.
However, Chutkan rejected Trump’s arguments, saying the office of the president “does not confer a lifelong ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ pass.”
Her latest order pauses any “further proceedings that would move this case towards trial or impose additional burdens of litigation on defendant.”
She left open the possibility of preserving the current trial date if the case returns to her court, saying that date and other deadlines were being paused rather than canceled.
She also said her ruling had no bearing on the enforcement of a gag order placing restrictions on Trump’s speech outside of court.
Smith’s team had asked Chutkan not to pause the case, saying the judge could continue to resolve issues unrelated to the appeal while the immunity claim is pending in appeals courts.
Prosecutors said they would “continue to meet every pretrial deadline the court has set for it,” so that the case could swiftly move to trial if the higher courts reject Trump’s immunity argument.
While simultaneously asking the Supreme Court to hear the case, Smith’s team had also asked the appeals court to expedite its consideration of Trump’s appeal.
Trump’s lawyers accused prosecutors of trying to rush the case through before the election.
Trump wrote on Truth Social that Smith was trying to interfere with the election by rushing to the Supreme Court on the question of immunity — something he said “is so basic to America that it should be automatic.”
He echoed that sentiment at a campaign event in Iowa, saying prosecutors had waited until “they saw I was hot” to bring a case.
A Supreme Court case usually lasts several months, from the time the justices agree to hear it until a final decision.
If the justices decline to step in now, Trump’s appeal would continue at the appeals court.
Smith said even a rapid appellate decision might not get to the Supreme Court in time for review and final word before its traditional summer break.
Additional reporting by AFP
POLITICAL PRISONERS VS DEPORTEES: Venezuela’s prosecutor’s office slammed the call by El Salvador’s leader, accusing him of crimes against humanity Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele on Sunday proposed carrying out a prisoner swap with Venezuela, suggesting he would exchange Venezuelan deportees from the US his government has kept imprisoned for what he called “political prisoners” in Venezuela. In a post on X, directed at Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Bukele listed off a number of family members of high-level opposition figures in Venezuela, journalists and activists detained during the South American government’s electoral crackdown last year. “The only reason they are imprisoned is for having opposed you and your electoral fraud,” he wrote to Maduro. “However, I want to propose a humanitarian agreement that
ECONOMIC WORRIES: The ruling PAP faces voters amid concerns that the city-state faces the possibility of a recession and job losses amid Washington’s tariffs Singapore yesterday finalized contestants for its general election on Saturday next week, with the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) fielding 32 new candidates in the biggest refresh of the party that has ruled the city-state since independence in 1965. The move follows a pledge by Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財), who took office last year and assumed the PAP leadership, to “bring in new blood, new ideas and new energy” to steer the country of 6 million people. His latest shake-up beats that of predecessors Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) and Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟), who replaced 24 and 11 politicians respectively
Young women standing idly around a park in Tokyo’s west suggest that a giant statue of Godzilla is not the only attraction for a record number of foreign tourists. Their faces lit by the cold glow of their phones, the women lining Okubo Park are evidence that sex tourism has developed as a dark flipside to the bustling Kabukicho nightlife district. Increasing numbers of foreign men are flocking to the area after seeing videos on social media. One of the women said that the area near Kabukicho, where Godzilla rumbles and belches smoke atop a cinema, has become a “real
‘WATER WARFARE’: A Pakistani official called India’s suspension of a 65-year-old treaty on the sharing of waters from the Indus River ‘a cowardly, illegal move’ Pakistan yesterday canceled visas for Indian nationals, closed its airspace for all Indian-owned or operated airlines, and suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third country. The retaliatory measures follow India’s decision to suspend visas for Pakistani nationals in the aftermath of a deadly attack by shooters in Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The rare attack on civilians shocked and outraged India and prompted calls for action against their country’s archenemy, Pakistan. New Delhi did not publicly produce evidence connecting the attack to its neighbor, but said it had “cross-border” links to Pakistan. Pakistan denied any connection to
RSS