Sun, Oct 15, 2023 page5

• Australians reject indigenous rights in referendum

  • AFP, SYDNEY
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Australians rejected giving indigenous people constitutional recognition and greater rights in a landmark referendum yesterday, Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said.

  “Australians have not voted for a change to the constitution,” Marles said, as partial results pointed to a resounding defeat for the reform. “We very much respect this result.”

  Almost 18 million Australians registered to vote in they landmark referendum on constitutional changes to acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders for the first time.

  

  Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his partner, Jodie Haydon, wave farewell after meeting voters during a visit to a polling booth in Dapto, Australia, yesterday.

  Photo: EPA-EFE

  The proposed reforms would also have created an Indigenous Voice to Parliament — to weigh laws that affect those communities and help address profound social and economic inequality.

  More than 230 years since the first British penal ships anchored in Sydney, the center-left government proposed the reforms as a step toward racial reconciliation — a reckoning with Australia’s bloody colonial past.

  Instead, it has sparked a rancorous and racially tinged debate that exposed a gulf between First Nations people and the white majority.

  With almost one-fifth of the 8,253 polling places reporting, the “no” campaign was leading “yes” votes by 58 to 42 percent.

  Australia’s First Nations peoples have lived on the continent for more than 60,000 years.

  Today, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people make up less than 4 percent of the population, but are much more likely to be sick, imprisoned or to die young than their generally wealthier white compatriots.

  Polls have consistently shown that voters would reject the proposals and that indigenous issues rank low on any list of public priorities for most Australians, far behind concerns such as the rising cost of living.

  In the days before the vote, media attention has focused as much on events in the Middle East as the political debate at home.

  “Yes” campaigner Karen Wyatt said she was “trying to stay positive” in the face of a seemingly inevitable defeat.

  Hard questions are already being asked about what a “no” vote would say about Australia and Australians.

  A rejection of the Voice would be “a shameful day for Australia,” 59-year-old Wyatt said in Sydney.

  “I think it does say something for the path of this country, to say ‘no’ to something that was a simple request and a generous proposition,” she said. “I hope if it is a ‘no,’ we can recover from it and move forward.”

  The opposition campaign has been successful in channeling fears about the role and effectiveness of the Voice assembly, encouraging people to vote “no” if they are uncertain.

  Dee Duchesne, 60, a volunteer for the “no” campaign, said she was “fighting to keep an extra layer of bureaucracy out of our constitution.”

  She said she had been called racist while handing out leaflets near a Sydney polling station during early voting.

  “I’m not,” she said.

  Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has spent a year and much precious political capital advocating for the “yes” campaign.

  On the day of the referendum he made an emotional plea to voters, asking them to right a historical wrong.

  “This week of all weeks, with so much hatred displayed in the world, this is an opportunity for Australians to show kindness,” he said. “This is about respect for indigenous Australians. It’s about how we see ourselves as a nation, but it’s also about the way that the world sees us.”
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Undersea cable to Penghu severed, Chinese-funded ship suspected

  • 2

    US exempts security funds for Taiwan

  • 3

    French aircraft carrier stages drills with Philippines

  • 4

    Taiwan keep WBC hopes alive with win

  • 5

    Photo shows Koo next to US general