Could the lives of the 8 billion people on Earth have depended on the resilience of just 1,280 human ancestors who nearly went extinct 900,000 years ago?
That is the finding of a recent study that used genetic analysis modelling to postulate that our ancestors teetered on the brink of annihilation for nearly 120,000 years.
However, scientists not involved in the research have criticized the claim, with one saying that there was “pretty much unanimous” agreement among population geneticists that it was not convincing.
None denied that the ancestors of humans could have neared extinction at some point, in what is known as a population bottleneck, but experts expressed doubts that the study could be so precise, given the extraordinarily complicated task of estimating population changes so long ago.
They said that similar methods had not spotted this massive population crash.
It is difficult to extract DNA from the few fossils of humans dated from more than a couple of hundred thousand years ago, making it hard to know much about them, but advances in genome sequencing mean that scientists are now able to analyze genetic mutations in modern humans, then use a computer model to infer how populations changed — even in the distant past.
The study, published in the journal Science earlier this month, looked at the genomes of more than 3,150 modern-day humans.
The Chinese-led team of researchers developed a model to crunch the numbers, finding that the population of breeding human ancestors shrank to about 1,280 about 930,000 years ago.
“About 98.7 percent of human ancestors were lost” at the start of the bottleneck, said coauthor Li Haipeng (李海鵬), a professor of evolutionary genomics at the Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
“Our ancestors almost went extinct and had to work together to survive,” Li told reporters.
The bottleneck, potentially caused by a period of global cooling, continued until 813,000 years ago, the study said.
Then there was a population boom, possibly sparked by a warming climate and “control of fire,” it said.
The researchers said that inbreeding during the bottleneck might explain why humans have a significantly lower level of genetic diversity compared with many other species.
The population squeeze might explain why so few fossils of human ancestors have been found from the period, the study said.
However, archeologists have said that some fossils dating from the time have been discovered in Kenya, Ethiopia, Europe and China, which might suggest that our ancestors were more widespread than such a bottleneck would allow.
“The hypothesis of a global crash does not fit in with the archeological and human fossil evidence,” British Museum curator Nicholas Ashton told Science.
In response, the study’s authors said that hominins then living in Eurasia and East Asia might not have contributed to the ancestry of modern humans.
“The ancient small population is the ancestor of all modern humans, otherwise we would not carry the traces in our DNA,” Li said.
Stephan Schiffels, group leader for population genetics at Germany’s Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, told reporters that he was “extremely skeptical” that the researchers had accounted for the statistical uncertainty involved in this kind of analysis.
It would “never be possible” to use genomic analysis of modern humans to get such a precise number as 1,280 from that long ago, Schiffels said, adding that there are normally wide ranges of estimations in such research.
Li said that the range in the study was 1,270 to 1,300 individuals.
Schiffels also said that the data used for the research had been around for years, and previous methods using it to infer past population sizes had not spotted any such near-extinction event.
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
Four decades after they were forced apart, US-raised Adamary Garcia and her birth mother on Saturday fell into each other’s arms at the airport in Santiago, Chile. Without speaking, they embraced tearfully: A rare reunification for one the thousands of Chileans taken from their mothers as babies and given up for adoption abroad. “The worst is over,” Edita Bizama, 64, said as she beheld her daughter for the first time since her birth 41 years ago. Garcia had flown to Santiago with four other women born in Chile and adopted in the US. Reports have estimated there were 20,000 such cases from 1950 to
CONFIDENT ON DEAL: ‘Ukraine wants a seat at the table, but wouldn’t the people of Ukraine have a say? It’s been a long time since an election, the US president said US President Donald Trump on Tuesday criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and added that he was more confident of a deal to end the war after US-Russia talks. Trump increased pressure on Zelenskiy to hold elections and chided him for complaining about being frozen out of talks in Saudi Arabia. The US president also suggested that he could meet Russian President Vladimir Putin before the end of the month as Washington overhauls its stance toward Russia. “I’m very disappointed, I hear that they’re upset about not having a seat,” Trump told reporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida when asked about the Ukrainian
RSS