The G7 yesterday pledged to quit fossil fuels faster and urged other countries to follow suit, but failed to agree to any new deadlines on ending polluting power sources such as coal.
The language reflects the depth of disagreements among member states on the balance between climate action and energy security, with host Japan leading a pushback against the most ambitious proposals discussed.
After two days of talks in the northern city of Sapporo, the bloc’s climate and environment ministers vowed to “accelerate the phase-out of unabated fossil fuels so as to achieve net zero in energy systems by 2050 at the latest ... and call on others to join us in taking the same action.”
Photo: EPA-EFE
However, they offered no new deadlines beyond last year’s G7 pledge to largely end fossil fuel use in their electricity sectors by 2035.
French Minister of Energy Transition Agnes Pannier-Runacher said the “phase-out” wording was nonetheless a “strong step forward” ahead of the G20 and UN climate summits.
The UK and France had put forward a new goal of ending “unabated” coal power — which does not take steps to offset emissions — in G7 electricity systems by 2030.
However, with global energy supplies still squeezed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the target faced pushback from other members, including bloc president Japan and the US.
“I would obviously have liked to have been able to make a commitment to phase out coal by 2030,” Pannier-Runacher said.
“It is one issue on which we can still make progress in forthcoming discussions, particularly at COP28,” she said, referring to a UN climate conference in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, in November.
All members of the G7, which also includes Germany, Italy, Canada and the EU, target net zero emissions by 2050 or sooner after signing the Paris Agreement to cap warming at well below 2°C, and ideally 1.5°C.
The ministers had been under pressure to announce bold steps after a major UN climate report last month said that a 1.5°C increase would be seen in about a decade without “rapid and far-reaching” action.
However, campaigners expressed fears ahead of the talks that Japan, supported by Germany and others, could lead backsliding on pledges such as ending new overseas fossil fuel financing.
G7 leaders last year said that the “exceptional circumstances” of the Ukraine war made gas investments “appropriate as a temporary response.”
Yesterday’s statement contains similar language, but also sets multiple parameters around such investments and highlights the “primary need” for “gas demand reduction.”
Still, climate campaigners said that the ambiguity sends the wrong message.
“The science is crystal clear that leaving the door open to investments in new gas or [liquefied natural gas] leaves the G7 off track for 1.5°C,” Oil Change International global public finance comanager Laurie van der Burg said in a statement.
Japanese Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Yasutoshi Nishimura nonetheless characterized the communique as “ambitious” and praised the G7 for “recognizing diverse paths towards carbon neutrality” during the energy crisis.
International Energy Agency executive director Fatih Birol said he was pleased with the statement.
“It combines our current energy security concerns and it also provides a road map on how we deal with the climate crisis,” he said, adding that Japan had played a “responsible and constructive” role.
However, the bloc stopped short of endorsing Japan’s strategy of burning hydrogen and ammonia alongside fossil fuels to reduce emissions — which climate campaigners say only serves to extend the lifespan of polluting plants.
Yesterday’s statement simply noted that “some countries are exploring” the potential of hydrogen fuels, adding that this should be “aligned with a 1.5°C pathway.”
Attempts to commit to halving emissions from vehicles in the G7 by 2035 also floundered, but the group for the first time pledged to end new plastic pollution by 2040.
The statement also urged a peak in global greenhouse emissions by 2025 at the latest.
Experts say this language is aimed at the world’s largest carbon emitter, China, which is targeting a peak in its emissions by 2030.
Airlines in Australia, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia and Singapore yesterday canceled flights to and from the Indonesian island of Bali, after a nearby volcano catapulted an ash tower into the sky. Australia’s Jetstar, Qantas and Virgin Australia all grounded flights after Mount Lewotobi Laki-Laki on Flores island spewed a 9km tower a day earlier. Malaysia Airlines, AirAsia, India’s IndiGo and Singapore’s Scoot also listed flights as canceled. “Volcanic ash poses a significant threat to safe operations of the aircraft in the vicinity of volcanic clouds,” AirAsia said as it announced several cancelations. Multiple eruptions from the 1,703m twin-peaked volcano in
A plane bringing Israeli soccer supporters home from Amsterdam landed at Israel’s Ben Gurion airport on Friday after a night of violence that Israeli and Dutch officials condemned as “anti-Semitic.” Dutch police said 62 arrests were made in connection with the violence, which erupted after a UEFA Europa League soccer tie between Amsterdam club Ajax and Maccabi Tel Aviv. Israeli flag carrier El Al said it was sending six planes to the Netherlands to bring the fans home, after the first flight carrying evacuees landed on Friday afternoon, the Israeli Airports Authority said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also ordered
Former US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi said if US President Joe Biden had ended his re-election bid sooner, the Democratic Party could have held a competitive nominating process to choose his replacement. “Had the president gotten out sooner, there may have been other candidates in the race,” Pelosi said in an interview on Thursday published by the New York Times the next day. “The anticipation was that, if the president were to step aside, that there would be an open primary,” she said. Pelosi said she thought the Democratic candidate, US Vice President Kamala Harris, “would have done
Farmer Liu Bingyong used to make a tidy profit selling milk but is now leaking cash — hit by a dairy sector crisis that embodies several of China’s economic woes. Milk is not a traditional mainstay of Chinese diets, but the Chinese government has long pushed people to drink more, citing its health benefits. The country has expanded its dairy production capacity and imported vast numbers of cattle in recent years as Beijing pursues food self-sufficiency. However, chronically low consumption has left the market sloshing with unwanted milk — driving down prices and pushing farmers to the brink — while
RSS