When Chen picked up his phone to vent his anger at getting a parking ticket, his message on WeChat was a drop in the ocean of daily posts on China’s biggest social network.
However, soon after his tirade against “simple-minded” traffic cops in June, he found himself in the tentacles of the communist country’s omniscient surveillance apparatus.
Chen quickly deleted the post, but officers tracked him down and detained him within hours, accusing him of “insulting the police.”
Photo: AFP
He was locked up for five days for “inappropriate speech.”
His case — one of the thousands logged by a dissident and reported by local media — laid bare the pervasive monitoring that characterizes life in China.
Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took power in 2012, he has reined in the relatively freewheeling social currents of the turn of the century, using a combination of technology, law and ideology to squeeze dissent and preempt threats to his rule.
Ostensibly targeting criminals and aimed at protecting order, social controls have been turned against dissidents, activists and religious minorities, as well as ordinary people — such as Chen — judged to have crossed the line.
Research company Comparitech estimates the average Chinese city has more than 370 security cameras per 1,000 people — making them the most surveilled places in the world — compared with London’s 13 or Singapore’s 18 per 1,000 people. The nationwide “Skynet” urban surveillance project has ballooned, with cameras capable of recognizing faces, clothing and age.
“We are being watched the whole time,” an environmental activist who declined to be named told Agence France-Presse (AFP).
The Chinese Communist Party’s grip is most stark in the far-western region of Xinjiang, where facial recognition and DNA collection have been deployed on Muslim minorities in the name of counterterrorism. The COVID-19 pandemic has turbocharged China’s monitoring, with citizens now tracked on their smartphones via an app that determines where they can go based on green, yellow or red codes.
Regulations rolled out since 2012 closed loopholes that allowed people to purchase SIM cards without giving their names, and mandated government identification for tickets on virtually all forms of transport.
Wang, a Chinese dissident speaking to AFP under a pseudonym due to safety concerns, recalled a time before Xi when censors were not all-knowing and “telling jokes about [former Chinese president] Jiang Zemin (江澤民) on the Internet was actually very popular.”
However, the Chinese Internet — behind the “Great Firewall” since the early 2000s — has become an increasingly policed space. Wang runs a Twitter account tracking thousands of cases of people detained, fined or punished for speech acts since 2013. Real-name verification systems and cooperation between police and social media platforms have seen people punished for a vast array of online offenses.
Platforms such as Sina Weibo employ thousands of content moderators to block politically sensitive keywords, such as tennis star Peng Shuai’s (彭帥) name after she accused a senior politician of sexual assault last year.
Many of the surveillance technologies in use have also been embraced in other countries.
“The real difference in China is the lack of independent media and civil society able to provide meaningful criticism of innovations, or to point out their many flaws,” Jeremy Daum, a fellow at the Paul Tsai China Center at Yale Law School, told AFP.
Xi has reshaped society, with the Chinese Communist Party stipulating what citizens “ought to know, to feel, to think, and say, and do,” professor emeritus of contemporary Chinese studies at the University of Oxford Vivienne Shue told AFP.
Youngsters are kept away from foreign influences, with authorities banning international books and forbidding tutoring companies from hiring overseas teachers. Ideological policing has extended to fashion, with television stations censoring tattoos and earrings on men.
“What disturbs me more is not the censorship itself, but how it shaped the ideology of people,” Wang said, adding that “with dissenting information being eliminated, every Web site becomes a cult, where the government and leaders have to be worshiped.”
Incumbent Ecuadoran President Daniel Noboa on Sunday claimed a runaway victory in the nation’s presidential election, after voters endorsed the young leader’s “iron fist” approach to rampant cartel violence. With more than 90 percent of the votes counted, the National Election Council said Noboa had an unassailable 12-point lead over his leftist rival Luisa Gonzalez. Official results showed Noboa with 56 percent of the vote, against Gonzalez’s 44 percent — a far bigger winning margin than expected after a virtual tie in the first round. Speaking to jubilant supporters in his hometown of Olon, the 37-year-old president claimed a “historic victory.” “A huge hug
Two Belgian teenagers on Tuesday were charged with wildlife piracy after they were found with thousands of ants packed in test tubes in what Kenyan authorities said was part of a trend in trafficking smaller and lesser-known species. Lornoy David and Seppe Lodewijckx, two 19-year-olds who were arrested on April 5 with 5,000 ants at a guest house, appeared distraught during their appearance before a magistrate in Nairobi and were comforted in the courtroom by relatives. They told the magistrate that they were collecting the ants for fun and did not know that it was illegal. In a separate criminal case, Kenyan Dennis
A judge in Bangladesh issued an arrest warrant for the British member of parliament and former British economic secretary to the treasury Tulip Siddiq, who is a niece of former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina, who was ousted in August last year in a mass uprising that ended her 15-year rule. The Bangladeshi Anti-Corruption Commission has been investigating allegations against Siddiq that she and her family members, including Hasina, illegally received land in a state-owned township project near Dhaka, the capital. Senior Special Judge of Dhaka Metropolitan Zakir Hossain passed the order on Sunday, after considering charges in three separate cases filed
APPORTIONING BLAME: The US president said that there were ‘millions of people dead because of three people’ — Vladimir Putin, Joe Biden and Volodymyr Zelenskiy US President Donald Trump on Monday resumed his attempts to blame Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy for Russia’s invasion, falsely accusing him of responsibility for “millions” of deaths. Trump — who had a blazing public row in the Oval Office with Zelenskiy six weeks ago — said the Ukranian shared the blame with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who ordered the February 2022 invasion, and then-US president Joe Biden. Trump told reporters that there were “millions of people dead because of three people.” “Let’s say Putin No. 1, but let’s say Biden, who had no idea what the hell he was doing, No. 2, and