Amid a rising wave of nationalism, Chinese shoppers have mounted at least 78 boycotts of foreign companies since 2016, more than six times the number seen in the preceding eight years, a new study found.
While consumer brands all face the same complex operating environment in China, how they get out of hot water differs depending on the issue, research by the Swedish National China Centre found.
In general, companies quickly apologize when they are being boycotted for issues around territory China considers sovereign, but far less frequently when it comes to the topic of alleged human rights violations.
Photo: Reuters
More than 80 percent of companies apologized upon facing backlash for actions or advertising seen as infringing on China’s territorial integrity, such as the status of Taiwan or Tibet, or the pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.
By contrast, only about one-quarter of firms expressed regret after making a stance against sourcing products from Xinjiang — the province where China is accused of human rights violations against the ethnic Uighur group.
The varying degree of sensitivity at play is reflected in how the same company responded differently to boycott threats. Walmart Inc apologized in 2018 over a sign in one of its Chinese stores that listed Taiwan, and not China, as the origin of some products, but did not last year amid social media allegations that Xinjiang-sourced products were taken off shelves, the study said.
The findings underscore how China’s 1.4 billion shoppers have gone from an untapped goldmine to a potential minefield for global consumer brands. With Asia’s biggest economy facing off with the US and others on everything from trade to cybersecurity and human rights to the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Chinese shoppers have become an economically powerful arm of Beijing’s political agenda, hurting revenue growth for companies from Nike Inc to Hennes & Mauritz AB (H&M).
“The emergence of alternative domestic products in China and a rise in online nationalism are putting a lot of pressure on global brands,” said Hillevi Parup, coauthor of the study in an e-mail interview.
“Consumer boycotts are on the rise in China and this trend does not appear to be going away anytime soon,” Parup asid.
Despite the hostile atmosphere, nearly half of the targeted companies weathered controversies without a public apology, the study said.
H&M — the biggest corporate target in the Xinjiang-related boycott wave last year — did not apologize, saying that it has always respected Chinese consumers and was devoted to its long-term growth in the country. The clothing brand is still not available on nearly all e-commerce platforms in China.
The study also found that the public reaction to company apologies “appears arbitrary.”
In some cases, an apology led to further backlash, with social media users calling out firms such as Hugo Boss AG for being “two-faced.”
“An apology isn’t a safe bet,” Parup said. “Based on our observations, the best option may be to try to avoid the public eye altogether.”
The varying apology rate could be due to intense scrutiny on Xinjiang’s forced labor issue in Europe and North America.
While firms might be able to stomach the reputational cost of being less supportive of Taiwan’s sovereign claim, for example, “it is much harder to imagine that they would be comfortable with accusations of being implicated in what some western parliaments and governments have labeled genocide,” the study said.
Intel Corp apologized in December last year after its opposition to Xinjiang labor sparked a backlash in China. Soon after, then-White House press secretary Jen Psaki said that “American companies should never feel the need to apologize for standing up for fundamental human rights or opposing repression.”
The study also found that the economic payoff of toeing China’s line was unclear.
Hugo Boss and Burberry faced Chinese consumers’ ire for statements related to Xinjiang. Hugo Boss apologized and Burberry declined to comment, but neither saw a significant drop in sales, the study said.
The think tank examined boycott incidents between 2008 and last year. Besides the general intensification since 2016, researchers found that boycotts peaked in 2019, when the US-China trade dispute was playing out.
The targeted attacks by Chinese consumers in the past few years have also displayed evidence of state support, the study said.
State-run media, for example, supported a 2019 campaign against luxury brands, including Coach, Versace and Givenchy, for failing to respect China’s territorial integrity.
“We have found evidence of state support in nearly a third of all boycotts, but this figure likely underestimates the true level of state involvement,” Parup said.
The Swedish National China Centre was established last year and is largely funded by the Swedish government to inform policymakers and businesses about China.
Drug lord Jose Adolfo Macias Villamar, alias “Fito,” was Ecuador’s most-wanted fugitive before his arrest on Wednesday, more than a year after he escaped prison from where he commanded the country’s leading criminal gang. The former taxi driver turned crime boss became the prime target of law enforcement early last year after escaping from a prison in the southwestern port of Guayaquil. Ecuadoran President Daniel Noboa’s government released “wanted” posters with images of his face and offered US$1 million for information leading to his capture. In a country plagued by crime, members of Fito’s gang, Los Choneros, have responded with violence, using car
Two former Chilean ministers are among four candidates competing this weekend for the presidential nomination of the left ahead of November elections dominated by rising levels of violent crime. More than 15 million voters are eligible to choose today between former minister of labor Jeannette Jara, former minister of the interior Carolina Toha and two members of parliament, Gonzalo Winter and Jaime Mulet, to represent the left against a resurgent right. The primary is open to members of the parties within Chilean President Gabriel Boric’s ruling left-wing coalition and other voters who are not affiliated with specific parties. A recent poll by the
TENSIONS HIGH: For more than half a year, students have organized protests around the country, while the Serbian presaident said they are part of a foreign plot About 140,000 protesters rallied in Belgrade, the largest turnout over the past few months, as student-led demonstrations mount pressure on the populist government to call early elections. The rally was one of the largest in more than half a year student-led actions, which began in November last year after the roof of a train station collapsed in the northern city of Novi Sad, killing 16 people — a tragedy widely blamed on entrenched corruption. On Saturday, a sea of protesters filled Belgrade’s largest square and poured into several surrounding streets. The independent protest monitor Archive of Public Gatherings estimated the
Irish-language rap group Kneecap on Saturday gave an impassioned performance for tens of thousands of fans at the Glastonbury Festival despite criticism by British politicians and a terror charge for one of the trio. Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, has been charged under the UK’s Terrorism Act with supporting a proscribed organization for allegedly waving a Hezbollah flag at a concert in London in November last year. The rapper, who was charged under the anglicized version of his name, Liam O’Hanna, is on unconditional bail before a further court hearing in August. “Glastonbury,
RSS