An Australian court yesterday threw out a landmark legal ruling that the nation’s environment minister had a duty to protect children from climate change.
Last year’s legal win by a group of high-school students had been hailed by environmental groups as a potential legal weapon to fight fossil fuel projects, but the federal court found in favor of an appeal by Australian Minister for the Environment Sussan Ley, deciding she did not have to weigh the harm climate change would inflict on children when assessing the approval of new fossil fuel projects.
The judgement overturned a ruling in July last year by a lower court that found the minister had a duty to “avoid causing personal injury or death” to under 18s due to “emissions of carbon dioxide into the Earth’s atmosphere.”
Photo: AP
Anjali Sharma, 17, who launched the legal action in 2020, said the minister’s successful appeal had left the students “devastated.”
“Two years ago, Australia was on fire; today, it’s under water. Burning coal makes bushfires and floods more catastrophic and more deadly. Something needs to change,” Sharma said.
Izzy Raj-Seppings, 15, said the court had accepted that young people would “bear the brunt of the impacts of the climate crisis,” which she described as an important step in climate litigation.
However, the federal court found emissions from the mine at the center of the case — Whitehaven’s Vickery coal mine — posed only a “tiny increase in risk” to the students.
Ley welcomed the verdict.
“The minister always takes her role as the environment minister seriously,” a spokesperson said in a statement.
Lawyer George Newhouse of Macquarie University said that the Sharma decision reflected Australia’s lack of a bill of rights.
“We don’t have the scope for the successful climate change litigation that we see in Europe because Australia has a constitution that, quite intentionally, contains no human rights,” Newhouse said.
He said landmark cases, such as the Urgenda precedent — in which Dutch citizens successfully sued their government to take climate action — would fail in Australia because of this.
“I am disappointed by the Sharma decision, but not surprised,” he said.
Sharma and her fellow students are considering whether to appeal to Australia’s highest court.
Climate and environmental law expert Laura Schuijers from the University of Sydney said the High Court might well elect to hear their appeal, given the importance of the questions raised.
Schuijers said Australia’s lack of a constitutional protection of human rights made it “a very interesting place for climate litigation.”
“It means that litigants are seeking creative ways to test the bounds of the law and to ask the ultimate question: In the face of inaction, who is responsible for picking up the slack?” she said.
The ruling had “put the spotlight on Australia’s politicians and policymakers to take the proactive action that the science presented in the courtroom suggests is urgently needed,” she added.
Australia has been at the sharp end of climate change, with droughts, deadly bushfires, bleaching events on the Great Barrier Reef and floods becoming more common and intense as global weather patterns change.
‘DISCRIMINATION’: The US Office of Personnel Management ordered that public DEI-focused Web pages be taken down, while training and contracts were canceled US President Donald Trump’s administration on Tuesday moved to end affirmative action in federal contracting and directed that all federal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) staff be put on paid leave and eventually be laid off. The moves follow an executive order Trump signed on his first day ordering a sweeping dismantling of the federal government’s diversity and inclusion programs. Trump has called the programs “discrimination” and called to restore “merit-based” hiring. The executive order on affirmative action revokes an order issued by former US president Lyndon Johnson, and curtails DEI programs by federal contractors and grant recipients. It is using one of the
One of Japan’s biggest pop stars and best-known TV hosts, Masahiro Nakai, yesterday announced his retirement over sexual misconduct allegations, reports said, in the latest scandal to rock Japan’s entertainment industry. Nakai’s announcement came after now-defunct boy band empire Johnny & Associates admitted in 2023 that its late founder, Johnny Kitagawa, for decades sexually assaulted teenage boys and young men. Nakai was a member of the now-disbanded SMAP — part of Johnny & Associates’s lucrative stable — that swept the charts in Japan and across Asia during the band’s nearly 30 years of fame. Reports emerged last month that Nakai, 52, who since
EYEING A SOLUTION: In unusually critical remarks about Russian President Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump said he was ‘destroying Russia by not making a deal’ US President Donald Trump on Wednesday stepped up the pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin to make a peace deal with Ukraine, threatening tougher economic measures if Moscow does not agree to end the war. Trump’s warning in a social media post came as the Republican seeks a quick solution to a grinding conflict that he had promised to end before even starting his second term. “If we don’t make a ‘deal,’ and soon, I have no other choice but to put high levels of Taxes, Tariffs, and Sanctions on anything being sold by Russia to the United States, and various other
In Earth’s upper atmosphere, a fast-moving band of air called the jet stream blows with winds of more than 442kph, but they are not the strongest in our solar system. The comparable high-altitude winds on Neptune reach about 2,000kph. However, those are a mere breeze compared with the jet stream on a planet called WASP-127b. Astronomers have detected winds howling at about 33,000kph on the large gaseous planet in our Milky Way galaxy approximately 520 light-years from Earth in a tight orbit around a star similar to our sun. The supersonic jet-stream winds circling WASP-127b at its equator are the fastest of their kind
RSS