Mon, Feb 17, 2025 page2

• Activists call for higher targets for carbon reduction

  ‘INSUFFICIENT’: Since Taiwan uses 2005 as its base year for emissions targets, its target for 2030 should be adjusted to 43.7 percent, the groups said

  • By William Hetherington / Staff writer, with CNA
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The government should propose a more aggressive carbon reduction target and ensure minimal impact on workers, environmentalist groups said in a joint statement yesterday.

  The Climate Change Adaptation Act (氣候變遷因應法), which came into effect on Feb. 15, 2023, states it was established to form strategies to reduce and manage greenhouse gas emissions, strengthen intergenerational justice and environmental justice, and according to Article 4 of the act, the long-term national greenhouse gas emission reduction goal is to reach net zero emissions by 2050.

  To achieve that, the Ministry of Environment should implement a more aggressive reduction target for 2030, said the joint statement from Green Citizens’ Action Alliance, the Citizen of the Earth foundation, the Environmental Rights Foundation, the Taiwan Environment and Planning Association and the Homemakers’ United Foundation.

  

  The entrance to the Ministry of Environment in Taipei is pictured in an undated photograph.

  Photo: Chen Chia-yi, Taipei Times

  According to the Sixth Assessment Report of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, countries should aim to reduce emissions by 43 percent by 2030 compared with 2019 levels.

  Since Taiwan uses 2005 as its base year for emissions targets, its target for 2030 should be adjusted to 43.7 percent, the statement said, adding that the ministry’s current reduction goal of 28 percent by 2030 is “insufficient.”

  The act does not provide the opportunity to seek redress for failing to meet reduction targets, and it “seriously infringes on individuals’ right to sue,” it said.

  “The act should be revised as soon as possible to include public interest litigation clauses,” it added.

  Implementation of targets was also inhibited by administrative issues, it said.

  For example, the Executive Yuan’s National Council for Sustainable Development, which is legally responsible for cross-departmental coordination on sustainability goals, has long been constrained by insufficient budget and workforce, it said, adding that the council’s role was obfuscated by the establishment last year of the Presidential Office’s National Climate Change Countermeasures Committee.

  “Another problem is that current policy focuses on the voluntary reduction plans of major emitters, and provides huge carbon fee discounts,” it said, adding that omissions in voluntary plans made it hard to achieve substantive supervision.

  Companies’ voluntary reduction plans, with the exception of anything confidential, should be made public, it said.

  “Details such as the estimated annual reduction from individual measures and the budgeted expenditures for such measures should be provided,” it added.

  Plans to address climate change also needed to facilitate a “just transition” and reduce the impact on workers, it said.

  Another issue is that the ministry allows small and medium-sized enterprise flexibility in how they design reduction plans, but that also results in an underestimation of emissions, it said.

  Finally, vertical integration is required to improve the efficacy of promoting reduction plans at the county and municipal level, it said.

  The National Council for Sustainable Development must be provided with more resources to properly coordinate and integrate policies, it added.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Four killed in Taichung mall explosion

  • 2

    Tesla uses Chinese courts to silence critics and make them pay

  • 3

    US removes no independence statement

  • 4

    Joint venture with Intel unfavorable for TSMC: expert

  • 5

    Taiwan thanks Japan for family registry change