Fri, Jan 10, 2025 page3

• Sites of injustice draft act fails preliminary review

  BUTTING HEADS: KMT and DPP lawmakers failed to reach a consensus on most articles, such as which periods should be covered by the act and what the sites should be called

  • By Shelley Shan / Staff reporter
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The legislature’s Education and Culture Committee yesterday failed to pass a preliminary review of a draft act on the preservation of sites of injustice, as lawmakers could not agree on how to properly address historical sites and historical periods that the draft act would cover.

  The National Human Rights Museum’s archive for historical sites of injustice defines “sites of injustice” as those where rulers during the authoritarian era — between Aug. 15, 1945 and Nov. 6, 1992 — contravened human rights by crushing protesters, committing extrajudicial executions, or abusing police or judicial systems to arrest, detain, rape, interrogate, judge, imprison, execute or bury people.

  While the Executive Yuan’s version of the draft act adopts the same definition and limits the purview of the bill to sites where injustices were committed between those dates, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Sra Kacaw and Non-Party Solidarity Union Legislator May Chin (高金素梅) — both representatives of indigenous constituents — proposed that the rulers of the Japanese colonial era between 1895 and 1945, and the Qing Dynasty be included as well.

  

  Members of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights and other groups hold a news conference in Taipei yesterday.

  Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times

  As lawmakers at the committee failed to reach a consensus on most of the articles, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Fan Yun (范雲), who convened the meeting, ruled to review the draft another time.

  Aside from the periods that should be covered in the act, lawmakers also shared different thoughts about whether the sites should be called “sites of injustice” or “human rights historical sites.”

  DPP Legislator Lin I-chin (林宜瑾) said that the act should specifically address violence committed by the authoritarian regime against individuals, which should be treated as a separate matter from that committed by colonial regimes.

  “Each era has its unique historical background and there should be different remedies for violence in different eras. Including all human rights violations, regardless of the eras in which they happened, would undermine the progress that has already been made in transitional justice. Neither would it help us to deliver a proper review of issues related to state violence,” Lin said.

  Sra Kacaw said that indigenous people endured injustices committed by every ruler of Taiwan, and therefore, the act should address all these injustices and all the historical sites related to them.

  Groups advocating for transitional justice also criticized the KMT’s version of the act, saying that it was meant to confuse the public about its perception of the authoritarian regime and diminish the brutality of state violence.

  “By proposing to expand the time periods covered by the act, is the KMT being serious about addressing issues of transitional justice by tackling its history of ruling through an authoritarian regime? Are they using ‘historical justice’ to confuse the public?” Taiwan Youth Association of Transitional Justice and Kiong-Seng secretary-general Pan Mei (潘美) said.

  Pan also urged the legislature to pass the draft act to preserve the sites of injustice.

  The National Human Rights Museum has listed 42 confirmed sites of injustice and 64 potential sites of injustice, but the landscape of many of the sites has changed, and the few that remain need urgent repairs, they said.

  Without the act, they would not be preserved and might soon be demolished, they added.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Bologna advance to face AC Milan in Coppa final

  • 2

    Bukele proposes prisoner swap with Maduro

  • 3

    Wild’s top line too much for Vegas Golden Knights

  • 4

    HK, Macau residency rules tightened

  • 5

    Eric Chu, 2 others to be questioned for leading illegal assembly last week