The legislature’s Education and Culture Committee yesterday failed to pass a preliminary review of a draft act on the preservation of sites of injustice, as lawmakers could not agree on how to properly address historical sites and historical periods that the draft act would cover.
The National Human Rights Museum’s archive for historical sites of injustice defines “sites of injustice” as those where rulers during the authoritarian era — between Aug. 15, 1945 and Nov. 6, 1992 — contravened human rights by crushing protesters, committing extrajudicial executions, or abusing police or judicial systems to arrest, detain, rape, interrogate, judge, imprison, execute or bury people.
While the Executive Yuan’s version of the draft act adopts the same definition and limits the purview of the bill to sites where injustices were committed between those dates, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Sra Kacaw and Non-Party Solidarity Union Legislator May Chin (高金素梅) — both representatives of indigenous constituents — proposed that the rulers of the Japanese colonial era between 1895 and 1945, and the Qing Dynasty be included as well.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
As lawmakers at the committee failed to reach a consensus on most of the articles, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Fan Yun (范雲), who convened the meeting, ruled to review the draft another time.
Aside from the periods that should be covered in the act, lawmakers also shared different thoughts about whether the sites should be called “sites of injustice” or “human rights historical sites.”
DPP Legislator Lin I-chin (林宜瑾) said that the act should specifically address violence committed by the authoritarian regime against individuals, which should be treated as a separate matter from that committed by colonial regimes.
“Each era has its unique historical background and there should be different remedies for violence in different eras. Including all human rights violations, regardless of the eras in which they happened, would undermine the progress that has already been made in transitional justice. Neither would it help us to deliver a proper review of issues related to state violence,” Lin said.
Sra Kacaw said that indigenous people endured injustices committed by every ruler of Taiwan, and therefore, the act should address all these injustices and all the historical sites related to them.
Groups advocating for transitional justice also criticized the KMT’s version of the act, saying that it was meant to confuse the public about its perception of the authoritarian regime and diminish the brutality of state violence.
“By proposing to expand the time periods covered by the act, is the KMT being serious about addressing issues of transitional justice by tackling its history of ruling through an authoritarian regime? Are they using ‘historical justice’ to confuse the public?” Taiwan Youth Association of Transitional Justice and Kiong-Seng secretary-general Pan Mei (潘美) said.
Pan also urged the legislature to pass the draft act to preserve the sites of injustice.
The National Human Rights Museum has listed 42 confirmed sites of injustice and 64 potential sites of injustice, but the landscape of many of the sites has changed, and the few that remain need urgent repairs, they said.
Without the act, they would not be preserved and might soon be demolished, they added.
Twenty-four Republican members of the US House of Representatives yesterday introduced a concurrent resolution calling on the US government to abolish the “one China” policy and restore formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan. Led by US representatives Tom Tiffany and Scott Perry, the resolution calls for not only re-establishing formal relations, but also urges the US Trade Representative to negotiate a free-trade agreement (FTA) with Taiwan and for US officials to advocate for Taiwan’s full membership in the UN and other international organizations. In a news release announcing the resolution, Tiffany, who represents a Wisconsin district, called the “one China” policy “outdated, counterproductive
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛) has “returned home” to Taiwan, and there are no plans to hold a funeral for the TV star who died in Japan from influenza- induced pneumonia, her family said in a statement Wednesday night. The statement was released after local media outlets reported that Barbie Hsu’s ashes were brought back Taiwan on board a private jet, which arrived at Taipei Songshan Airport around 3 p.m. on Wednesday. To the reporters waiting at the airport, the statement issued by the family read “(we) appreciate friends working in the media for waiting in the cold weather.” “She has safely returned home.
ON PAROLE: The 73-year-old suspect has a criminal record of rape committed when he was serving in the military, as well as robbery and theft, police said The Kaohsiung District Court yesterday approved the detention of a 73-year-old man for allegedly murdering three women. The suspect, surnamed Chang (張), was arrested on Wednesday evening in connection with the death of a 71-year-old woman surnamed Chao (趙). The Kaohsiung City Police Department yesterday also unveiled the identities of two other possible victims in the serial killing case, a 75-year-old woman surnamed Huang (黃), the suspect’s sister-in-law, and a 75-year-old woman surnamed Chang (張), who is not related to the suspect. The case came to light when Chao disappeared after taking the suspect back to his residence on Sunday. Police, upon reviewing CCTV
TRUMP ERA: The change has sparked speculation on whether it was related to the new US president’s plan to dismiss more than 1,000 Joe Biden-era appointees The US government has declined to comment on a post that indicated the departure of Laura Rosenberger as chair of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT). Neither the US Department of State nor the AIT has responded to the Central News Agency’s questions on the matter, after Rosenberger was listed as a former chair on the AIT’s official Web site, with her tenure marked as 2023 to this year. US officials have said previously that they usually do not comment on personnel changes within the government. Rosenberger was appointed head of the AIT in 2023, during the administration of former US president Joe