In a series of war games in the seas and skies around Taiwan last month, China deployed some of its newest strike aircraft, warships and missile forces.
One of the most menacing weapons used in the drills: an updated version of a bomber that first flew in the early years of the Cold War.
Like the US, which still relies on upgraded versions of the B-52, a bomber from the same era, China has successfully modernized its jet-powered H-6 to carry on flying deep into the 21st century.
Photo: Reuters
These bombers were shown on China’s state-controlled media taking off for missions designed to intimidate Taiwan as part of the war-game drills.
Dubbed “Joint-Sword 2024B” by China’s military, the maneuvers were a “stern warning” to people in Taiwan seeking independence, the Chinese military said.
Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense reported that 153 Chinese military aircraft, 14 naval vessels and 12 other ships were detected around the nation over a 25-hour period after the start of the exercise on Oct. 14.
The ministry also reported that 111 of the aircraft had crossed the median line of the Taiwan Strait and entered the nation’s air defense identification zone.
The ministry told Reuters that “three groups of three H-6 aircraft” had been detected operating in the nation’s airspace during China’s military exercise.
Two of the groups “conducted simulated attack drills,” the ministry said.
China’s Ministry of National Defense did not respond to questions for this story.
Some modernized versions of China’s H-6 bomber are now capable of launching ballistic missiles armed with nuclear warheads, while others can carry multiple long-range anti-ship and land attack missiles, according to defense analysts and Pentagon reports on the Chinese military.
Some versions can be refueled in flight, allowing them to fly from bases on the Chinese mainland and strike at targets deep into the Western Pacific, where the US has large bases on Guam and elsewhere.
Asked about the military drills, Taiwan’s defense ministry said the nation was using “joint intelligence surveillance to keep track of the communist military's movements around Taiwan,” while also dispatching “air, sea and missile forces to respond as appropriate to ensure national defense and security.”
Pentagon spokesperson Major Pete Nguyen said the US was “prepared to respond to any threat and protect the homeland.”
US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin “has often said that he does not believe conflict with the PRC [People’s Republic of China] is imminent nor inevitable,” Nguyen said in response to questions.
Unlike the US, which stopped building the B-52 in 1962, China has continued to make the twin-engine H-6 at a plant in central China.
However, H-6 production may have recently slowed or been halted, according to Thomas Shugart, a former US Navy submarine officer and an expert on China’s military.
He estimates the Chinese air force now has about 230 of these bombers.
The H-6 is derived from the Tupolev Tu-16 bomber, which the Soviet Union introduced into service in the early 1950s and was given the NATO code name Badger.
China began building these aircraft under license in the late 1950s, according to experts on the Chinese People’s Liberation Army.
The Taiwanese and Japanese militaries have reported that H-6 bombers have been frequently deployed on flights near their airspace in recent years.
They are also sent on flights over the South China Sea, where Beijing claims sovereignty over extensive areas of disputed territory.
In a conflict, these bombers would pose a serious threat to ships and targets on land, US and Taiwanese military experts say.
Shugart said that Chinese military doctrine for island landing campaigns, such as an invasion of Taiwan, calls for strikes against headquarters, communications facilities, logistics centers and other key targets, along with attacks on airfields, ports and ships at sea.
“I would expect H-6s to be involved in all of these sorts of operations,” he said.
These attacks would likely be coordinated with missile strikes, possibly without warning, that would soften air defenses and crater runways to trap aircraft on the ground, Shugart added.
He said these aircraft could then be hit with cruise missiles launched from H-6 bombers.
China’s official media in mid-September provided some insight into the role the H-6 might play in a clash off the Chinese coast.
State broadcaster CCTV showed footage of one of these bombers flying in an exercise with fighters and a long-range WZ-7 surveillance drone.
The drone penetrated the air defenses of a potential adversary, identified a target and relayed this information to the H-6, according to the footage.
The bomber was shown launching an anti-ship missile.
Experts say the US should try to neutralize the H-6 bombers while they are still on the ground.
“Any common sense war plan would target those aircraft before they could take off,” said David Deptula, dean of the Washington-based Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies and a retired US Air Force lieutenant general.
In March testimony to the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Shugart said that China’s H-6 force has expanded and these aircraft now have improved airframes, technology, engines and long-range weapons.
While regularly sending the H-6 on missions off the Chinese coast, Beijing is now deploying these aircraft in the same way the US Air Force uses long-range patrols of the B-52 and its other bombers to signal its ability to strike at distant targets.
On July 24, US and Canadian fighter jets scrambled to intercept a joint patrol of two Chinese H-6 and two Russian Tu-95 bombers near Alaska, according to a statement from the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD).
While the Russians conduct regular patrols in this area, it was the first time Chinese bombers had flown close to the US mainland in an operation that revealed the growing power and confidence of China’s military, former US air force officers said.
The flights were not seen “as a threat, and NORAD continues to monitor competitor activity near North America and meet presence with presence,” Nguyen said.
The Chinese and Russian defense ministries did not respond to a request for comment.
A spokesman for China’s Ministry of National Defense, Senior Colonel Zhang Xiaogang (張曉剛), told a news conference at the time that the joint patrol was to test and improve coordination between the Chinese and Russian air forces.
“This operation does not target any third party,” Zhang said.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang
RSS