The National Science and Technology Council’s (NSTC) draft artificial intelligence (AI) basic act (人工智慧基本法) lacks the required procedures that AI researchers and developers should follow and could contradict existing regulations on personal data protection, financial supervision and medical equipment, the Taiwan Association for Human Rights said.
After the Ministry of Digital Affairs in 2019 published guidelines governing the research and development of AI, the council this year announced the draft AI basic act.
The draft was released amid growing calls from the international community for governments to address the risks AI development pose and to safeguard basic human rights.
Photo: Reuters
While a large part of the draft act focuses on the role of government in facilitating the development of AI, the procedures that government agencies should follow when developing and applying AI remain unclear, the association said.
A few problems have emerged from the government’s use of AI, such as when the Judicial Yuan used AI to draft verdicts of criminal cases, while the government has yet to disclose the results of the Ministry of Justice’s use of AI to evaluate prisoners’ risks of recidivism, it said.
The National Health Insurance Administration and Google this year jointly developed an AI system to evaluate the risks of diabetes, but documents related to the partnership did not show the sources of the data used to train the system, it said.
Additionally, a draft act governing the management of health and social welfare data (衛福資料管理條例) has yet to be passed by the legislature, the association said.
Unlike the EU, which regulates AI based on risk levels involved in its use, Taiwan’s draft AI act only requires the digital ministry to stipulate an AI risk framework without clearly defining relations between the council and other agencies, it said.
The draft act also does not include regulations on basic human rights protections and remedial measures, it added.
Whether the act can protect personal privacy and data security and avoid the discrimination of specific groups and individuals are questionable, it said.
Although the draft lists seven major principles, it does not have corresponding rules of implementation, the association said.
Regarding the principles of privacy protection and data management, the draft allows the reuse of nonsensitive data, such as data unrelated to medical history, genetic information, sexuality, health examinations and criminal records, which could contradict the Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法), it said.
“We strongly advise the government to first clarify the relation between the draft act and other regulations, and revise the legal framework to ensure that all measures designed for safety and to protect human rights could be thoroughly implemented. The public and private sectors should have rules to abide by in the development and application of AI,” the association said.
In response, the NSTC said the draft act does not allow AI developers and researchers to disobey personal data protection, financial supervision and medical equipment laws.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University law professor Carol Lin (林志潔) said that Taiwan, much like the US, is in the research-and-development phase of AI.
Having some flexibility in the basic act is not completely unreasonable, she said.
“The focus of a basic act is to offer general principles, guidelines, directions and flexibility as an industry grows,” she said. “Different government agencies can still stipulate rules to counter the effects of AI on industries under their supervision. The draft act would not contradict other laws.”
The government should set up an experimental arena with controllable risks for start-ups to test their AI-related services, products and business models, Lin said, adding that this would help the government revise and stipulate AI laws.
The government used the “financial regulatory sandbox” model to regulate financial technology at the initial phase, she said.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), spokeswoman Yang Chih-yu (楊智伃) and Legislator Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介) would be summoned by police for questioning for leading an illegal assembly on Thursday evening last week, Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) said today. The three KMT officials led an assembly outside the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office, a restricted area where public assembly is not allowed, protesting the questioning of several KMT staff and searches of KMT headquarters and offices in a recall petition forgery case. Chu, Yang and Hsieh are all suspected of contravening the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) by holding
PRAISE: Japanese visitor Takashi Kubota said the Taiwanese temple architecture images showcased in the AI Art Gallery were the most impressive displays he saw Taiwan does not have an official pavilion at the World Expo in Osaka, Japan, because of its diplomatic predicament, but the government-backed Tech World pavilion is drawing interest with its unique recreations of works by Taiwanese artists. The pavilion features an artificial intelligence (AI)-based art gallery showcasing works of famous Taiwanese artists from the Japanese colonial period using innovative technologies. Among its main simulated displays are Eastern gouache paintings by Chen Chin (陳進), Lin Yu-shan (林玉山) and Kuo Hsueh-hu (郭雪湖), who were the three young Taiwanese painters selected for the East Asian Painting exhibition in 1927. Gouache is a water-based
Taiwan would welcome the return of Honduras as a diplomatic ally if its next president decides to make such a move, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. “Of course, we would welcome Honduras if they want to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan after their elections,” Lin said at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, when asked to comment on statements made by two of the three Honduran presidential candidates during the presidential campaign in the Central American country. Taiwan is paying close attention to the region as a whole in the wake of a
OFF-TARGET: More than 30,000 participants were expected to take part in the Games next month, but only 6,550 foreign and 19,400 Taiwanese athletes have registered Taipei city councilors yesterday blasted the organizers of next month’s World Masters Games over sudden timetable and venue changes, which they said have caused thousands of participants to back out of the international sporting event, among other organizational issues. They also cited visa delays and political interference by China as reasons many foreign athletes are requesting refunds for the event, to be held from May 17 to 30. Jointly organized by the Taipei and New Taipei City governments, the games have been rocked by numerous controversies since preparations began in 2020. Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said yesterday that new measures by
RSS