The Constitutional Court yesterday heard arguments in a case involving the constitutionality of amendments to government oversight laws, with expert witnesses disagreeing on whether the legislative process was so flawed it should be declared void by the court.
The deliberation that led up to the passage of the amendments, which took effect on June 26, was fundamentally flawed because lawmakers approved the revisions by raising their hands and the names of the voters were not recorded, said expert witness Chang Wen-chen (張文貞), a law professor at National Taiwan University.
Chang cited a constitutional ruling in 2000, which said that such a voting method “contravened the principle of openness and transparency” and constituted “manifest and gross procedural flaws.”
Photo: CNA
In the 2000 ruling (Constitutional Interpretation No. 499), the court deemed the constitutional amendments adopted a year prior by the now-defunct National Assembly unconstitutional due in part to the use of secret ballots during the deliberation.
The oversight laws should be considered “quasi-constitutional statutes” as they “directly affected” the responsibilities of top government bodies stipulated in the Constitution, Chang said.
The case was brought to court by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus, the Executive Yuan, President William Lai (賴清德) and the Control Yuan in a bid to reject the oversight laws.
The amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) and the Criminal Code were pushed through by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers at the end of May. The Constitutional Court issued an injunction that halted the enforcement of some revisions, including those that would give legislators much broader investigative powers.
Responding to Chang’s arguments, expert witness Ed Huang (黃銘輝), an associate professor at National Taipei University’s Department of Law, said the oversight laws did not apply the “vigorous” views adopted in the 2000 ruling and that the Constitutional Court should instead consider the 1994 ruling (Constitutional Interpretation No. 342) on the Organic Act of the National Security Council (國家安全會議組織法).
That ruling highlighted the court’s adherence to the “principle of legislative autonomy,” according to which the court should respect the legislature as an entity that operates under its own rules and procedures, Huang said.
The ruling also said the court should intervene only in the event of major flaws in the legislative process, defined as those that “can be determined ... without investigation into the facts,” Huang said.
Although the oversight laws were passed by lawmakers raising their hands in approval, they were legitimate according to the legislature’s rules of procedure, TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) said.
Neither electronic nor recorded voting is a “default rule” in the legislative process, he added.
However, attorney Chen Peng-kwang (陳鵬光), representing the DPP caucus, said that electronic and recorded voting had been adopted in the legislative process “by convention” for the past three decades.
The passage of the oversight amendments was an exception, because Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) contravened long-standing convention and disregarded the principle of openness and transparency, Chen said.
The oral arguments, which lasted until 5pm, also touched upon updated measures that expand the legislature’s investigative powers and require the president to periodically address the legislature and then take questions.
The case is being presided over by 15 justices, who were all appointed by former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of the DPP.
Under the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法), the approval of at least eight justices is required for any of the amendments to be annulled.
The court should rule on te case within three months of the conclusion of oral arguments, but the deadline can be extended by two months if necessary.
Five countries have in the past few months canceled preferential visa treatment for Taiwan passport holders due to pressure from China, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said yesterday. It was responding to a report by the National Audit Office that the number of countries offering preferential visa treatment to holders of Taiwan passports had dropped from 171 at the end of last year to 166 in April. In its Central Government Budget Audit Report, the National Audit Office also said that the ministry had failed to provide timely updates on the visa changes, which could affect Taiwan passport holders’ overseas travel. In response
More Taiwanese spectators at the Paris Olympics have reported having signs and banners confiscated by security staff or snatched by Chinese fans. Sandy Hsueh (薛雅俶), president of the Taiwanese Association in France, said that three security personnel confiscated a blank piece of cardboard from her at Sunday’s men’s doubles badminton final, in which Taiwan’s Lee Yang (李洋) and Wang Chi-lin (王齊麟) defeated China’s Liang Weikeng (梁偉鏗) and Wang Chang (王昶) to win their second consecutive Olympic gold medal in the event. A staff member told her they had “received an instruction from the Olympic Games saying that anything related to Taiwan or
DISCRIMINATORY: Airlines’ uniform requirements contravene the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, a watchdog said Airline companies’ appearance requirements obliging female flight attendants to wear pencil skirts and high heels are discriminatory, and they should be able to have the option to wear pants, the National Human Rights Commission said in a report yesterday. Completing a year-long probe, commission members said the uniform requirements of Taiwan’s air carriers contravened the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). To fight gender-based discrimination, government agencies should issue guidelines and require airlines to make changes so that female flight attendants have the option to wear pants, the report said. The Taoyuan Flight Attendants’ Union in
COGNITIVE WARFARE: The People’s Liberation Army’s recent military exercises near Taiwan aim to intimidate the Taiwanese public, a legislator said Two sorties of Chinese drones were detected flying around the perimeter of Taiwan proper between 6am on Saturday and 6am yesterday, according to the Ministry of National Defense. A total of 31 Chinese military aircraft — which included several drones — and 12 Chinese warships were detected operating in and near the Taiwan Strait over the 24-hour period, the ministry said. Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said the maneuvers were likely aimed at affecting public sentiment in Taiwan, demonstrating defiance toward the US’ two-plus-two talks with India and Australia, and enacting China’s polarized strategy of pushing