Tama Talum was not guilty of using a rifle to kill protected species without permission, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday, reversing its previous ruling.
The court previously upheld a ruling by the Taitung District Court, which sentenced Tama Talum, a Bunun, to three years and six months in jail for contravening the Controlling Guns, Ammunition and Knives Act (槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例) and the Wildlife Conservation Act (野生動物保育法).
Tama Talum, who was at his home in Taitung when yesterday’s verdict was issued, said that he was happy that the case is finally over after 11 years.
Photo: Wu Cheng-feng, Taipei Times
Aside from thanking supporters of indigenous peoples’ hunting rights, as well as lawyers and government officials who helped him resolve the case, he went into his room and looked at a picture of his mother, who died of COVID-19 in 2022 at the age of 100, telling her that he is “no longer guilty.”
Attorney Lo Hui-shin (羅惠馨), who represented Tama Talum, said that the Supreme Court’s decision was a landmark.
“Hunters of indigenous tribes no longer need to worry when they go hunting, but lawmakers and government agencies still need to fix the regulations governing hunting,” Lo said. “They cannot always seek remedies through the judicial system, which should be the last resort.”
Tama Talum was charged after using a rifle to kill a Taiwan serow, a protected species, and a Reeves’s muntjac in 2013.
He appealed the Taitung District Court’s ruling to the Taiwan High Court and the Supreme Court, which both initially rejected his appeals.
In 2015, then-prosecutor general Yen Ta-ho (顏大和) filed a special appeal on his behalf to the Supreme Court, which in 2017 asked the Constitutional Court to weigh in on the case.
The Constitutional Court in 2021 ruled that the district court’s verdict was partly unconstitutional, resulting in the case being referred to the Supreme Court.
On May 20, 2021, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) pardoned Tama Talum, which kept him from serving prison time.
Despite the pardon, the Supreme Court in 2021 rejected the special appeal filed in 2015.
While the Constitutional Court ruled unconstitutional a portion of the verdict, that did not have any bearing on the part to do with contraventions of the Controlling Guns, Ammunition and Knives Act, the Supreme Court said.
The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office in 2022 launched a second special appeal.
The Supreme Court yesterday said in a statement that it reversed its previous ruling because Tama Talum did not make the gun he used.
“Tama Talum went hunting to bring food for his family, not for commercial use,” the statement said. “Even though he did not secure government permission in advance, the Controlling Guns, Ammunition and Knives Act does not apply in this case.”
Article 18-1 of the Wildlife Conservation Act does not apply to indigenous people, it added.
The Wildlife Conservation Act and the Indigenous Peoples Basic Law (原住民族基本法) protect the rights of indigenous people to hunt and hold festivals based on their traditions and cultures, but the laws do not specify the types of animals they could hunt, it added.
The Constitutional Court recognizes that hunting and killing wildlife is part of indigenous cultures and protected species should not be included, so it is difficult to see why a criminal punishment was warranted in this case, it said.
‘DENIAL DEFENSE’: The US would increase its military presence with uncrewed ships, and submarines, while boosting defense in the Indo-Pacific, a Pete Hegseth memo said The US is reorienting its military strategy to focus primarily on deterring a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan, a memo signed by US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth showed. The memo also called on Taiwan to increase its defense spending. The document, known as the “Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance,” was distributed this month and detailed the national defense plans of US President Donald Trump’s administration, an article in the Washington Post said on Saturday. It outlines how the US can prepare for a potential war with China and defend itself from threats in the “near abroad,” including Greenland and the Panama
The High Prosecutors’ Office yesterday withdrew an appeal against the acquittal of a former bank manager 22 years after his death, marking Taiwan’s first instance of prosecutors rendering posthumous justice to a wrongfully convicted defendant. Chu Ching-en (諸慶恩) — formerly a manager at the Taipei branch of BNP Paribas — was in 1999 accused by Weng Mao-chung (翁茂鍾), then-president of Chia Her Industrial Co, of forging a request for a fixed deposit of US$10 million by I-Hwa Industrial Co, a subsidiary of Chia Her, which was used as collateral. Chu was ruled not guilty in the first trial, but was found guilty
A wild live dugong was found in Taiwan for the first time in 88 years, after it was accidentally caught by a fisher’s net on Tuesday in Yilan County’s Fenniaolin (粉鳥林). This is the first sighting of the species in Taiwan since 1937, having already been considered “extinct” in the country and considered as “vulnerable” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. A fisher surnamed Chen (陳) went to Fenniaolin to collect the fish in his netting, but instead caught a 3m long, 500kg dugong. The fisher released the animal back into the wild, not realizing it was an endangered species at
DEADLOCK: As the commission is unable to forum a quorum to review license renewal applications, the channel operators are not at fault and can air past their license date The National Communications Commission (NCC) yesterday said that the Public Television Service (PTS) and 36 other television and radio broadcasters could continue airing, despite the commission’s inability to meet a quorum to review their license renewal applications. The licenses of PTS and the other channels are set to expire between this month and June. The National Communications Commission Organization Act (國家通訊傳播委員會組織法) stipulates that the commission must meet the mandated quorum of four to hold a valid meeting. The seven-member commission currently has only three commissioners. “We have informed the channel operators of the progress we have made in reviewing their license renewal applications, and