Most university students break up with a partner over text message, while both sides tend to evade communication, a survey by the Good Shepherd Welfare Foundation found yesterday, as it warned that improper communication increases the chance of conflict.
The foundation administered two separate surveys — one to people who initiated a breakup and another to those who were broken up with.
Among initiators, 41 percent broke the news by texting, while 32 percent met face-to-face, the foundation said in a news release.
Photo: Fang Wei-chieh, Taipei Times
Another 18 percent spoke over the phone, 8 percent cut off contact and 1 percent asked an intermediary to pass along the message.
About half of the initiators said they used personal judgements about their relationship to communicate a breakup, such as “it is not suitable,” or there is “no emotion,” while 24 percent gave vague or abstract reasons, such as saying: “You can find someone you are more compatible with.”
Only about 21 percent of the participants adopted a positive tone and gave specific reasons, such as citing different life goals or values, or saying it would be “better for us both.”
About 6 percent used negative expressions of discontent, such as accusing their partner of “suffocating” them or saying “I never liked you.”
Among those who were broken up with, half said they received a text message, 17 percent said they spoke over the phone and 16 percent said they met in person.
About 9 percent of the respondents who were broken up with said their partner suddenly broke off contact, 4 percent spoke to an intermediary and 4 percent gave other reasons, including the partner using emotional abuse to force a breakup.
In the aftermath, half felt wronged and engaged in self-examination, while 23 percent repeatedly tried to contact their partner and 37 percent avoided discussing the issue.
The foundation said that 18 percent of the participants said they would consider retaliating if they feel disrespected by sharing their grievances online or through emotional blackmail.
College is a time when many couples start to consider and prepare for marriage, said Ting Shu-hui (丁淑惠), director of the violence prevention and social work unit of the foundation’s Taichung center.
Learning to recognize the effects of violence, safe ways to express emotions and how to seek help are key to avoiding conflict, she said, adding that breakups can lead to violent outcomes if not handled well.
The survey found that only 21 percent of those who were broken up with positively communicated their feelings, with the rest choosing avoidance, Ting said.
Triggered by the stressful situation, it is common for one side to avoid while the other pursues answers, Ting said.
However, this lack of empathy and communication can easily lead to misunderstandings, which can make the relationship even worse or result in conflict, she said.
When ending a relationship, it is important to say a proper farewell so each party can move on, she said.
First, couples should take stock of their feelings and reasoning to ease any feelings of shock or panic, she said.
Next, they should work together to accept the facts, resolve negative emotions and eventually let go of the attachment so that both sides can move on, she added.
The Taipei Zoo on Saturday said it would pursue legal action against a man who was filmed climbing over a railing to tease and feed spotted hyenas in their enclosure earlier that day. In videos uploaded to social media on Saturday, a man can be seen climbing over a protective railing and approaching a ledge above the zoo’s spotted hyena enclosure, before dropping unidentified objects down to two of the animals. The Taipei Zoo in a statement said the man’s actions were “extremely inappropriate and even illegal.” In addition to monitoring the hyenas’ health, the zoo would collect evidence provided by the public
A decision to describe a Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement on Singapore’s Taiwan policy as “erroneous” was made because the city-state has its own “one China policy” and has not followed Beijing’s “one China principle,” Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Tien Chung-kwang (田中光) said yesterday. It has been a longstanding practice for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to speak on other countries’ behalf concerning Taiwan, Tien said. The latest example was a statement issued by the PRC after a meeting between Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on the sidelines of the APEC summit
A road safety advocacy group yesterday called for reforms to the driver licensing and retraining system after a pedestrian was killed and 15 other people were injured in a two-bus collision in Taipei. “Taiwan’s driver’s licenses are among the easiest to obtain in the world, and there is no mandatory retraining system for drivers,” Taiwan Vision Zero Alliance, a group pushing to reduce pedestrian fatalities, said in a news release. Under the regulations, people who have held a standard car driver’s license for two years and have completed a driver training course are eligible to take a test
‘SIGN OF DANGER’: Beijing has never directly named Taiwanese leaders before, so China is saying that its actions are aimed at the DPP, a foundation official said National Security Bureau (NSB) Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) yesterday accused Beijing of spreading propaganda, saying that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had singled out President William Lai (賴清德) in his meeting with US President Joe Biden when talking about those whose “true nature” seek Taiwanese independence. The Biden-Xi meeting took place on the sidelines of the APEC summit in Peru on Saturday. “If the US cares about maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait, it is crucial that it sees clearly the true nature of Lai and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in seeking Taiwanese independence, handles the Taiwan question with extra
RSS