Sat, Jun 10, 2023 page3

• Ko says he will ask China about ‘1992 consensus’

  • Staff writer, with CNA
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  China has never clearly stated its interpretation of the so-called “1992 consensus,” Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said, adding that he would ask Beijing to do so if he is elected.

  In an interview on Tuesday in Japan with the Asahi Shimbun, Ko was asked what he thought of China’s demand that Taiwan accept the “1992 consensus.”

  The “1992 consensus” — a term that former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted making up in 2000 — refers to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.

  

  Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je speaks to reporters in Kaohsiung yesterday.

  Photo: Lee Hui-chou, Taipei Times

  The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) rejects the “1992 consensus,” saying that agreeing to it implies acceptance of China’s claim over Taiwan.

  “The problem is that China itself has not made clear its definition of the ‘1992 consensus,’” Ko said in the interview, adding that if he is elected president, he will ask Beijing to give a clear, official interpretation of the consensus.

  Ko, who returned to Taiwan on Thursday night from visiting Japan, said he did not make such a request to Beijing during his eight-year tenure as Taipei mayor, but he knew that China had accepted his preferred formulation as a basis for dialogue — that both sides of the Taiwan Strait are “one family.”

  

  Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je, second left, shakes hand with American Institute in Taiwan Chair Laura Rosenberger in Kaohsiung yesterday.

  Photo: Hsu Li-chuan, Taipei Times

  Ko was also asked if he thought he was more capable than the other two presidential candidates — New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the KMT and Vice President William Lai (賴清德) of the DPP — of engaging in dialogue with Beijing.

  Ko said the KMT had lost the public’s trust on issues relating to China.

  “The reason the Sunflower movement emerged [in 2014] was because the KMT had gotten involved in dealings with China without gaining the trust of the Taiwanese public,” he said.

  The DPP, meanwhile, is incapable of engaging with China, because there is no mutual trust, and the two sides are constantly fighting, Ko added.

  Asked how Taiwan and China could peacefully coexist, Ko said it was important to remember that “the current China is not how China will be forever.”

  “China will change,” Ko said. “Just as we shouldn’t use ideas from 30 years ago to solve today’s problems, we shouldn’t use today’s situation to speculate on what things will be like 30 years from now.”

  He said that at best, predictions can only be made five to 10 years ahead, not even 15 years.

  In an interview later on Wednesday with Japanese public broadcaster NHK, Ko was asked about Taiwan’s sovereignty claims over the disputed Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台).

  Ko said that in general, Taiwanese people are not interested in having “that piece of land,” but they do want to maintain their rights to fish there.

  That comment quickly drew flak from the DPP and KMT.

  Trying to walk back Ko’s statement, his campaign office said that Ko is committed to protecting Taiwanese sovereignty.

  At the same time, Ko believes it is necessary to “start with the reality” of the situation, and he took the opportunity to stand up for the rights to livelihood of Taiwanese fishers, his campaign spokeswoman Chen Chih-han (陳智菡) said.

  Meanwhile, in Kaohsiung yesterday, Ko held a closed-door meeting with American Institute in Taiwan Chair Laura Rosenberger for about two-and-a-half hours.

  Rosenberger also met with Hou on Wednesday and Lai on Thursday.

  Additional reporting by Hsu Li-chuan
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Tesla uses Chinese courts to silence critics and make them pay

  • 2

    US removes no independence statement

  • 3

    Taiwan in Time: When the Soviets bombed Taiwan for China

  • 4

    Taiwan thanks Japan for family registry change

  • 5

    MAC warns of PRC arrests, detentions