China has never clearly stated its interpretation of the so-called “1992 consensus,” Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said, adding that he would ask Beijing to do so if he is elected.
In an interview on Tuesday in Japan with the Asahi Shimbun, Ko was asked what he thought of China’s demand that Taiwan accept the “1992 consensus.”
The “1992 consensus” — a term that former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted making up in 2000 — refers to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Photo: Lee Hui-chou, Taipei Times
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) rejects the “1992 consensus,” saying that agreeing to it implies acceptance of China’s claim over Taiwan.
“The problem is that China itself has not made clear its definition of the ‘1992 consensus,’” Ko said in the interview, adding that if he is elected president, he will ask Beijing to give a clear, official interpretation of the consensus.
Ko, who returned to Taiwan on Thursday night from visiting Japan, said he did not make such a request to Beijing during his eight-year tenure as Taipei mayor, but he knew that China had accepted his preferred formulation as a basis for dialogue — that both sides of the Taiwan Strait are “one family.”
Photo: Hsu Li-chuan, Taipei Times
Ko was also asked if he thought he was more capable than the other two presidential candidates — New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the KMT and Vice President William Lai (賴清德) of the DPP — of engaging in dialogue with Beijing.
Ko said the KMT had lost the public’s trust on issues relating to China.
“The reason the Sunflower movement emerged [in 2014] was because the KMT had gotten involved in dealings with China without gaining the trust of the Taiwanese public,” he said.
The DPP, meanwhile, is incapable of engaging with China, because there is no mutual trust, and the two sides are constantly fighting, Ko added.
Asked how Taiwan and China could peacefully coexist, Ko said it was important to remember that “the current China is not how China will be forever.”
“China will change,” Ko said. “Just as we shouldn’t use ideas from 30 years ago to solve today’s problems, we shouldn’t use today’s situation to speculate on what things will be like 30 years from now.”
He said that at best, predictions can only be made five to 10 years ahead, not even 15 years.
In an interview later on Wednesday with Japanese public broadcaster NHK, Ko was asked about Taiwan’s sovereignty claims over the disputed Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台).
Ko said that in general, Taiwanese people are not interested in having “that piece of land,” but they do want to maintain their rights to fish there.
That comment quickly drew flak from the DPP and KMT.
Trying to walk back Ko’s statement, his campaign office said that Ko is committed to protecting Taiwanese sovereignty.
At the same time, Ko believes it is necessary to “start with the reality” of the situation, and he took the opportunity to stand up for the rights to livelihood of Taiwanese fishers, his campaign spokeswoman Chen Chih-han (陳智菡) said.
Meanwhile, in Kaohsiung yesterday, Ko held a closed-door meeting with American Institute in Taiwan Chair Laura Rosenberger for about two-and-a-half hours.
Rosenberger also met with Hou on Wednesday and Lai on Thursday.
Additional reporting by Hsu Li-chuan
The Taipei Zoo on Saturday said it would pursue legal action against a man who was filmed climbing over a railing to tease and feed spotted hyenas in their enclosure earlier that day. In videos uploaded to social media on Saturday, a man can be seen climbing over a protective railing and approaching a ledge above the zoo’s spotted hyena enclosure, before dropping unidentified objects down to two of the animals. The Taipei Zoo in a statement said the man’s actions were “extremely inappropriate and even illegal.” In addition to monitoring the hyenas’ health, the zoo would collect evidence provided by the public
A decision to describe a Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement on Singapore’s Taiwan policy as “erroneous” was made because the city-state has its own “one China policy” and has not followed Beijing’s “one China principle,” Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Tien Chung-kwang (田中光) said yesterday. It has been a longstanding practice for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to speak on other countries’ behalf concerning Taiwan, Tien said. The latest example was a statement issued by the PRC after a meeting between Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on the sidelines of the APEC summit
A road safety advocacy group yesterday called for reforms to the driver licensing and retraining system after a pedestrian was killed and 15 other people were injured in a two-bus collision in Taipei. “Taiwan’s driver’s licenses are among the easiest to obtain in the world, and there is no mandatory retraining system for drivers,” Taiwan Vision Zero Alliance, a group pushing to reduce pedestrian fatalities, said in a news release. Under the regulations, people who have held a standard car driver’s license for two years and have completed a driver training course are eligible to take a test
‘SIGN OF DANGER’: Beijing has never directly named Taiwanese leaders before, so China is saying that its actions are aimed at the DPP, a foundation official said National Security Bureau (NSB) Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) yesterday accused Beijing of spreading propaganda, saying that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had singled out President William Lai (賴清德) in his meeting with US President Joe Biden when talking about those whose “true nature” seek Taiwanese independence. The Biden-Xi meeting took place on the sidelines of the APEC summit in Peru on Saturday. “If the US cares about maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait, it is crucial that it sees clearly the true nature of Lai and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in seeking Taiwanese independence, handles the Taiwan question with extra