The Constitutional Court is to hear arguments tomorrow on whether an article in the Civil Code limiting the circumstances in which couples can file for divorce contravenes the Constitution’s protection of individual freedoms.
The case relates to Clause 2, Article 1052 of the Civil Code, which states that a husband or wife can petition for divorce upon the occurrence of an event that renders it difficult to maintain the marriage.
However, if only one party is “responsible for the event,” then “only the other party may petition for divorce,” the clause says.
Photo: Tu Chien-jung, Taipei Times
Kaohsiung Juvenile and Family Court Judge Chu Cheng-kun (朱政坤) applied for the constitutional interpretation based on three cases that are before him.
Chu said that the clause contravenes the right to divorce as protected under Article 22 of the Republic of China Constitution, and also contradicts previous rulings by the court, including Interpretation No. 791, which decriminalized adultery.
In addition to limiting people’s freedom to end a relationship, the law also has the practical effect of devaluing marriage by allowing it to be used to “trap” individuals in relationships that only exist in official documents, Chu said.
A case coclaimant surnamed Fang (方) has been unable to divorce a woman he married more than 50 years ago, even though he has since raised three children with another woman in Hong Kong.
Fang said that the law has found him to be “responsible” for the difficulties in his marriage and was deemed ineligible to file for divorce.
The law is to be defended in the case by the Ministry of Justice.
Previously, the ministry has said that in cases where an event has made it difficult to maintain a marriage, both parties are often found responsible and thus have sufficient grounds for divorce.
It has also said that any potential amendments to the law should be left to the Legislative Yuan and not be decided by the courts.
Arguments in the case are to be heard starting at 9:30am tomorrow.
The proceedings are to be open to the public and broadcast live on the Internet.
Civil society groups yesterday protested outside the Legislative Yuan, decrying Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) efforts to pass three major bills that they said would seriously harm Taiwan’s democracy, and called to oust KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁). It was the second night of the three-day “Bluebird wintertime action” protests in Taipei, with organizers announcing that 8,000 people attended. Organized by Taiwan Citizen Front, the Economic Democracy Union (EDU) and a coalition of civil groups, about 6,000 people began a demonstration in front of KMT party headquarters in Taipei on Wednesday, organizers said. For the third day, the organizers asked people to assemble
Taipei is participating in Osaka’s Festival of Lights this year, with a 3m-tall bubble tea light installation symbolizing Taiwan’s bubble tea culture. The installation is designed as a bubble tea cup and features illustrations of Taipei’s iconic landmarks, such as Taipei 101, the Red House and North Gate, as well as soup dumplings and the matchmaking deity the Old Man Under the Moon (月下老人), affectionately known as Yue Lao (月老). Taipei and Osaka have collaborated closely on tourism and culture since Taipei first participated in the festival in 2018, the Taipei City Department of Information and Tourism said. In February, Osaka represented
POOR IMPLEMENTATION: Teachers welcomed the suspension, saying that the scheme disrupted school schedules, quality of learning and the milk market A policy to offer free milk to all school-age children nationwide is to be suspended next year due to multiple problems arising from implementation of the policy, the Executive Yuan announced yesterday. The policy was designed to increase the calcium intake of school-age children in Taiwan by drinking milk, as more than 80 percent drink less than 240ml per day. The recommended amount is 480ml. It was also implemented to help Taiwanese dairy farmers counter competition from fresh milk produced in New Zealand, which is to be imported to Taiwan tariff-free next year when the Agreement Between New Zealand and
IDENTITY SHIFT: Asked to choose to identify as either Taiwanese or Chinese, 83.3 percent of respondents chose Taiwanese, while 8.4 percent chose Chinese An overwhelming majority of Taiwanese, 71.5 percent, think that Taiwan should compete in international competitions under the name “Taiwan,” a Taiwan Brain Trust survey published yesterday showed. Referring to Taiwan’s victory last month at the World Baseball Softball Confederation’s Premier12, the survey results showed that 89.1 percent of respondents said that Taiwan’s exceptional performance in sporting competitions furthers national unity. Only 18.8 percent of respondents supported Taiwanese teams’ continued use of the name “Chinese Taipei” in international sporting competitions, the survey showed. Among Taiwan’s leading political parties, the name “Team Taiwan” was supported by 91.1 percent of self-identified Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) supporters,
RSS