A referendum, by textbook definition, is a democratic right that provides people an opportunity to engage in public policy and express their opinions on issues of national importance through a direct vote.
However, how often do people truly let their voice be heard without their ballot being hijacked by political parties?
To be fair, political parties are not to be blamed. A responsible party in a democracy is duty-bound to make known to the public its stance on a matter being put to a vote. In the case of the upcoming referendum, each of the nation’s major parties has done exactly that.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
On the ballots on Dec. 18 are to be four referendum questions, asking voters if they agree that the government should ban the importation of pork containing traces of the leanness-enhancing additive ractopamine; relocate a planned liquefied natural gas terminal to protect algal reefs off Taoyuan’s Guanyin District (觀音); activate the mothballed Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮); and hold referendums alongside national elections.
The Democratic Progressive Party on June 30 passed a proposal allotting a special budget of NT$57 million (US$2.05 million at the current exchange rate) for a promotional campaign urging people to vote “no” on all four items.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has called on people to vote “yes” on the two items initiated by its lawmakers, namely the proposal on pork imports and the motion on referendums, while saying that it respects and would assist the campaigning of the other two referendum proposals brought by civic groups.
The New Power Party said it is only opposed to the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, while the Taiwan People’s Party has called on people to vote “yes” on banning the importation of ractopamine pork and protecting the algae reef, while urging them to vote “no” on the power plant question and the motion regarding referendums.
However, there is no denying that the referendum has also become a political arena for parties to bolster their standing, shoehorn the electorate into stamping legitimacy on preconceived policies, or spin it as a vote of no confidence in the government.
This is where the role of a responsible voter comes in.
On complex issues that have been simplified to a “yes” or “no” answer on a ballot, voters have the responsibility to educate themselves so that they can independently form an opinion that truly reflects what they think of the issue.
Due to the large volume of information voters have to consume in a relatively short period before the poll, it is understandable that they often follow the guidance of politicians they trust in deciding how to vote.
This approach, however convenient, defeats the purpose of a plebiscite that claims the legitimacy of direct democracy and allows voters to have a say in the nation’s policymaking.
Conscientious voters must not waste the power in their hands by letting political parties tell them how to vote.
Fortunately, the nation, being a democracy, has a sound system in place to keep voters informed on the pros and cons of issues being put to a vote.
Five televised presentations have been scheduled by the Central Election Commission for the public to gain a better understanding of the referendum questions, with two sessions left to go, which are to take place on Thursday and Dec. 11.
Taiwan has often been lauded for its robust democracy, an achievement every Taiwanese should be proud of.
However, sustaining democracy requires constant effort, which includes voters fulfilling their citizenship duties so that they could be the true masters of the nation and not reduce themselves to marionettes of political parties.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods