Yen Ching-chang (顏慶章): The GATT [General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, the predecessor to the WTO] was signed on Oct. 30, 1947. In its many drafts, it clearly stated that governments entering under the name “separate customs territory” essentially lack national sovereignty, so when Taiwan applied to enter the GATT on Jan. 1, 1990, it used the name “the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu.”
Looked at another way, Taiwan had no way to compete with China due to international circumstances at the time, forcing the nation to minimize itself by applying not under its official title, but as a so-called “autonomous entity.”
This undeniably minimized our sovereignty, making us suffer within the global trade system ever since.
Photo: Hu Chih-kai, Taipei Times
This became most obvious in 1992, when a working group was formed to approve our application, followed by a series of bilateral trade negotiations. During a review meeting, the [GATT] chairman specifically mentioned that Taiwan’s representative throughout its time as an observer and then a full member should be “along the same lines” as that of Hong Kong and Macau. Not only that, but the titles used by Taiwan’s representatives could not have diplomatic connotations.
So this entire process essentially showed that, because of the name on our application, we do not have sovereignty and therefore all follow-up meetings and negotiations would continue to trample on our national dignity.
NEW WORLD AGREEMENTS
When we joined the WTO [in 2002], the attitude in Geneva [Switzerland] toward Taiwan was completely different than the global attitude today.
Because we had used the “separate customs territory” name, we were forced to call our delegations “economic and trade offices” in a similar convention to Hong Kong and Macau. All told, apart from the few small countries with which we had diplomatic relations, most nations tried to avoid the subject like the plague. The situation now is totally different.
When [former US] president Barack Obama was forming the TPP [Trans-Pacific Partnership], he repeatedly invited Taiwan to join, even going so far as to say that the point [of the trade bloc] was to counter China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region.
Former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe also brought it up in his address to the US Congress, saying clearly that we must seek free and democratic economic cooperation in the Asia-Pacific, and in so doing, we must exclude members who bring intimidation. At the time, most people worldwide called the TPP the ‘anyone but China club.’
JOINING JAPAN’S CPTPP
As part of his “America First” policy, [former US] president Donald Trump withdrew from the TPP after his election, but maintained a strong presence in the region through trade and politics that deeply intimidated China.
Since the US withdrew, Abe led the 11 other members in completing the pact in 2018, making Japan leader of the new CPTPP. Then over the past few years, Japan has expressed strong support for Taiwan, although there are admittedly a few details that have upset Japan, such as the Fukushima food safety issue. [After the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster, Taiwan banned food from five Japanese prefectures.]
Truthfully speaking, Taiwan-Japan relations are very good in some areas. Since Taiwanese donated more money to Japan after the [2011] tsunami and power plant disaster than any other country, Japan is grateful and has shown its sincerity through policy.
This year happens to be Japan’s turn to lead the CPTPP, but its term will be over in less than two months. It is a shame because, if Taiwan had acted a little bit sooner, it could have worked with Japan. Instead we have wasted all that time from the establishment of the CPTPP in 2018 until now.
NAMES MATTER
Our application to join the CPTPP follows the naming convention from our 1990 GATT application. What is important to remember is that this “separate customs territory” name comes from the GATT charter. We cannot ignore that it is used for an unsovereign entity. If Taiwan is forced to resign itself to this title, there is nothing we can do.
As I said, in 1990 we applied under the “separate customs territory” name, then two years later in September and October 1992, the director-general accepted our application. In that meeting, the chairman further declared that the representative would be “hereinafter referred to as Chinese Taipei,” thereby also giving us that title in the GATT.
The way we translate it as Zhonghua Taibei (中華台北) sounds horrible, but it saves face. If it were translated directly from English would Taiwanese accept this name? This happened back in 1992; would Taiwanese today be willing to make such a concession?
POWERFUL FRIENDS
Today, Taiwan’s international situation has improved a lot. The US offers support in many areas, and it has only become more firm and apparent since [US President Joe] Biden took office.
We will of course not talk about countries that do not have a geopolitical relationship with the CPTPP, but among those that do, Japan is the biggest. There is also Australia, which has already stated that it wants to align with Japan and Canada. Canada has in the past not expressed a clear stance on Taiwan, but because of the Huawei [Technologies] situation, it has come to realize how China pressures its neighbors, including Canada.
So the CPTPP of course requires a consensus among its 11 members, the same as the WTO. In that consensus, we can imagine that if only one country opposes — no matter how big or small — Taiwan cannot join. However, we should also have confidence, since it also only takes one country to oppose China’s entry.
ALREADY ‘TAIWAN’
As for changing our name, I think it could be discussed in future negotiations.
Alternatively, another major member such as Japan could do what they did during the Tokyo Olympics and directly say “Taiwan” instead of “Chinese Taipei.” This is actually already happening internationally.
For instance, in all government documents and statements since breaking ties in 1979, the US has called us Taiwan; it has never used “Chinese Taipei.” It is the same with Australia — none of the countries with more economic weight in the CPTPP will call us the “Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” so we should not minimize ourselves, either.
I will not say it is impossible to change the name on our application. If it is possible, we could work with some big countries such as Japan, Canada and Australia to reach a consensus with the other members.
ONE CHOICE
Then of course there is only one choice of name. The Republic of China is definitely not feasible, because there are a lot of arenas where using this name is impossible.
Diplomacy is an extension of domestic affairs, but our domestic conversation around this issue is frankly confusing.
If we insist on using the Republic of China, it is too similar to the People’s Republic of China in English and therefore untenable internationally.
As we cannot accept “Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” the best middle ground is “Taiwan.”
However, there are still some Taiwanese who refuse to use this name, making it impossible to speak with any consistency at home, and adding a great deal of difficulty when trying to say what country you are from or which government you represent while abroad.
FIRST, CONSENSUS
I want to encourage all Taiwanese to think about this: Ever since we withdrew from the UN in 1971, we have been called the Republic of China, but now this term has no room for survival on the international stage.
How should we consider eliciting national pride with the consensus of all people? Most crucially, we must first have pride in this land before we can become great; we cannot wait to become great before we identify as a nation.
We must do this now, because if we do not change, over the next 50 years where will we find ourselves?
Reporting by Ou Hsiang-yi, Liu Yan-chen and Hu Chih-kai
Translated by Kayleigh Madjar
A drunk woman was sexually assaulted inside a crowded concourse of Taipei Railway Station on Thursday last week before a foreign tourist notified police, leading to calls for better education on bystander intervention and review of security infrastructure. The man, surnamed Chiu (邱), was taken into custody on charges of sexual assault, taking advantage of the woman’s condition and public indecency. Police discovered that Chiu was a fugitive with prior convictions for vehicle theft. He has been taken into custody and is to complete his unserved six-month sentence, police said. On Thursday last week, Chiu was seen wearing a white
EVA Airways, one of the leading international carriers in Taiwan, yesterday said that it was investigating reports that a cabin crew manager had ignored the condition of a sick flight attendant, who died on Saturday. The airline made the statement in response to a post circulating on social media that said that the flight attendant on an outbound flight was feeling sick and notified the cabin crew manager. Although the flight attendant grew increasingly ill on the return flight, the manager did not contact Medlink — a system that connects the aircraft to doctors on the ground for treatment advice during medical
The Taoyuan Flight Attendants’ Union yesterday vowed to protest at the EVA Air Marathon on Sunday next week should EVA Airway Corp’s management continue to ignore the union’s petition to change rules on employees’ leave of absence system, after a flight attendant reportedly died after working on a long-haul flight while ill. The case has generated public discussion over whether taking personal or sick leave should affect a worker’s performance review. Several union members yesterday protested at the Legislative Yuan, holding white flowers and placards, while shouting: “Life is priceless; requesting leave is not a crime.” “The union is scheduled to meet with
‘UNITED FRONT’ RHETORIC: China’s TAO also plans to hold weekly, instead of biweekly, news conferences because it wants to control the cross-strait discourse, an expert said China’s plan to expand its single-entry visa-on-arrival service to Taiwanese would be of limited interest to Taiwanese and is a feeble attempt by Chinese administrators to demonstrate that they are doing something, the Mainland Affairs Council said yesterday. China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) spokesman Chen Binhua (陳斌華) said the program aims to facilitate travel to China for Taiwanese compatriots, regardless of whether they are arriving via direct flights or are entering mainland China through Hong Kong, Macau or other countries, and they would be able to apply for a single-entry visa-on-arrival at all eligible entry points in China. The policy aims
RSS