Mon, May 25, 2020 page2

• Group protests Taipei rail station hall restrictions

  • By Shelley Shan / Staff reporter
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA) should not use the government’s disease-prevention policy as an excuse to block people’s access to the Taipei Railway Station’s main hall, the Taiwan International Workers’ Association said yesterday.

  The association held a protest at the station after what organizers said were about 400 people staged a sit-in on Saturday to demonstrate against the TRA’s proposal to ban sitting on the floor of the main hall.

  In accordance with the Central Epidemic Command Center’s disease-prevention measures, large gatherings have been banned in the hall since the end of February.

  

  Muslim women sit on the floor during an early morning prayer on Eid al-Fitr at the Taipei Travel Plaza near Taipei Railway Station yesterday.

  Photo: CNA

  After protesters yesterday expressed their grievances at the southern entrance to the station, they marched toward the center of the main hall and sat down, saying they dared police to drag them away.

  Station Master Huang Jung-hua (黃榮華) said that the protesters would not be fined, as they were simply expressing their opinions.

  “We will include the group next week when we discuss how the public space should be used,” Huang said.

  

  Members of the Taiwan International Workers’ Association yesterday protest outside Taipei Railway Station, urging the Taiwan Railways Administration to refrain from using disease prevention as an excuse to block people’s access to the station’s main hall.

  Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times

  The railway agency distributed bottled water to people at the railway station, most of whom sat around the pillars in the main hall.

  The Ministry of Transportation and Communications and the TRA last week said that the main hall would be open to the public after the COVID-19 outbreak is brought under control, although they would set rules on how the main hall should be properly used.

  Until then, the hall would remain closed to public events, including yesterday’s Eid al-Fitr celebrations, they said.

  Association representative Chen Hsiu-lien (陳秀蓮) said that the issues of where migrant workers should go to celebrate Eid al-Fitr and whether migrant workers could gather at Taipei Railway Station for such an event are covered by the media whenever the Muslim festival approaches.

  Rather than focusing on whether migrant workers should be allowed to sit in the main hall on holidays or during Eid al-Fitr, Chen said that the public should focus on how the railway agency has exploited a public space for monetary gain.

  After the agency outsourced management of the station mainly to the Breeze Center, government agencies or non-profit organizations would need to pay NT$40,000 to NT$120,000 to host events in the main hall, whereas private organizations or schools would have to pay NT$60,000 to NT$500,000, she said.

  “The agency has been telling people that the main hall was not designed for people to sit on the floor. What it did not say was that people can do so, they will only have to pay for it,” she said.

  An Indonesian migrant worker named Wiwin said that many migrant workers are carers whose salaries did not meet the minimum wage.

  It is impossible for migrant workers to regularly frequent restaurants on the second floor of the station so that they can have a place to sit, she said.

  “Most of us have less than a day to ourselves and can only meet at large transport hubs. As such, the main hall at the Taipei Railway Station is an important place for us,” she said.

  “Citizens of this country need a place to sit as well, but why do people always use migrant workers as a reason when they enforce a policy? Why would our sitting in the main hall impede the foot traffic inside the train station, but a large event at the main hall would not?” she asked.

  Yang You-ren (楊友仁), a sociology professor at Tunghai University, said that the main hall is one of the rare places in the nation where people can freely exchange their ideas and observations.

  Imposing a sitting ban would be like bringing back martial law, Yang said, adding that the government should maintain social diversity by encouraging people to communicate in public spaces.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Bologna advance to face AC Milan in Coppa final

  • 2

    Bukele proposes prisoner swap with Maduro

  • 3

    Wild’s top line too much for Vegas Golden Knights

  • 4

    HK, Macau residency rules tightened

  • 5

    Eric Chu, 2 others to be questioned for leading illegal assembly last week