In a tragic incident off the Greek coast, an overcrowded fishing vessel carrying around 750 migrants overturned on June 14. This accident claimed the lives of over 80 people.
These desperate migrants had opted for the dangerous sea route via Greece because of its standing as a major gateway to the European Union. Unfortunately, the number of people exceeded the capacity of the boat, and it overturned. Following the disaster, Greek authorities initiated a thorough inquiry amid accusations of negligence. Claims that the ill-fated boat overturned because of poorly executed towing attempts by the Greek coastguard were hotly contested. Officials insisted any line thrown to the boat was merely to assess the boat’s situation, not to tow.
The boat was transporting a diverse group of migrants, individuals who had left their home countries for Europe in hopes of improved living conditions or employment. Given the economic turmoil and political instability in Pakistan, where around half of the migrants on the boat came from, a significant proportion of those involved in the incident could be classified as refugees. These were people compelled to abandon their homelands not by choice, but by adverse conditions threatening their survival. Accompanying them were people who had resolved to make Europe their permanent home for whatever reason. In fact, waves of immigrants have created heightened tension in Europe since the 2010s, prompting increasingly rigorous border controls that only address the symptoms without addressing the root causes of mass migration.
Photo from Wikimedia / 照片:Wikimedia提供
This distressing incident highlights the grim realities of the ongoing migrant crisis in the Mediterranean, which is putting the lives of countless families in peril. Their desperate voyages not only challenge Europe’s border regulations but also reveal the deeper, unresolved crisis of the global inequality that forces migrants to seek better lives.
在希臘外海發生了一起悲慘事件,一艘承載約750名移民而擁擠不堪的漁船於6月14日翻覆。這場意外造成80多人罹難。
這些絕望的移民選擇了經由希臘的危險海路,因為該國有歐盟主要門戶的地位。不幸的是,乘船人數超出了船隻的載客量,船隻翻覆了。在這起災難事件發生後,希臘當局在面對過失的指控當中展開徹查。有人聲稱這艘命運多舛的船隻會翻覆是因為希臘海巡隊嘗試拖曳船隻的行動執行不當,但這一說法遭到了強烈反駁。官員堅稱向船隻拋擲的任何繩索都僅僅用於評估船隻情況,並非拖曳船隻。
這艘船隻運送著形形色色的一群移民,他們離開祖國前往歐洲,希望獲得更好的生活條件或就業機會。船上的移民大約有一半來自巴基斯坦,鑑於該國經濟動盪和政治不穩定的情況,受此事故牽連的很大一部分人可以被歸類為難民。這些人被迫放棄家園,這並非出於選擇,而是受到威脅他們生存的不利條件所迫而不得不為之。一同乘船的還有那些無論出於何種原因都決定將歐洲作為永久家園的人。事實上,自西元2010年代以來,移民潮引發歐洲緊張局勢升溫,促使邊境管制日益嚴格,但這項做法只是治標不治本,並未解決大規模移民的根本原因。
這起令人痛心疾首的事件突顯了持續發生於地中海地區的移民危機的嚴峻現實,這使無數家庭的生命處於險境之中。他們的絕望航程不僅是對歐洲邊境規範的挑戰,也揭示了更深層次而尚未化解的全球不平等危機,這種不平等迫使移民尋求更好的生活。
MORE INFORMATION
overturn v. (使)翻覆
standing n. 地位
initiate vt. 啟動;開始
negligence n. 過失;疏忽
contest vt. 質疑;反駁
adverse adj. 不利的;負面的
heighten vt. 加劇;增強
rigorous adj. 嚴格的;嚴厲的
distressing adj. 令人痛心的
the Mediterranean 地中海
KEY VOCABULARY
1. migrant n. 移民;遷徙者
The migrant workers travel from place to place in search of employment.
這些移工四處奔波以尋找工作。
2. inquiry n. 調查;打聽
The committee conducted an inquiry to uncover the truth behind the financial scandal.
委員會進行了調查,揭示這起金融醜聞背後的真相。
3. amid prep. 在……當中
Jay couldn’t find his homework amid the piles of clothes and books that covered his bedroom.
杰在堆滿他臥室的一堆堆衣服與書本之中找不到他的回家作業。
4. accusation n. 指控;譴責
Jason made an accusation that Daniel was the one responsible for murdering the cook.
傑森指控丹尼爾正是那位謀殺廚師的人。
5. execute vt. 執行;完成
The robbers waited until night to execute their plan to break into the bank.
強盜們等到夜晚才執行他們闖入銀行的計畫。
6. turmoil n. 動盪;混亂
The huge earthquake caused turmoil in the city; people were left homeless and had to steal food.
那場大地震在該城市引起騷動;人們無家可歸且不得不偷取食物。
7. compel vt. 迫使;激起
The raging storm compelled the captain to make quick decisions to ensure everyone’s safety.
這場狂風暴雨迫使船長迅速做出決定,以確保每個人的安全。
8. grim adj. 嚴峻的;令人沮喪的
Although the situation was grim, the soldiers vowed to keep fighting.
儘管局勢嚴峻,但士兵們發誓要繼續戰鬥。
9. peril n. 危險;險境
Firefighters rushed to save residents in peril from the blazing building.
消防員連忙從燃燒的建築物中拯救身處於險境之中的居民。
學習音檔: https://magazine.english4u.net/Magdata/menu/3dust
《空中美語》雜誌APP免費下載: https://www.english4u.net/apps/index.aspx
免費收聽當月《空中美語》雜誌課文朗讀及解析 !
文章由AMC空中美語授權使用: https://www.english4u.net
A: Have you seen the reality TV show “Culinary Class Wars?” B: Sure! It’s a competition between two classes: 20 celebrity chefs dubbed the “white spoons” versus 80 non-celebrity chefs dubbed the “black spoons.” A: The two judges are master chef, Paik Jong-won, and South Korea’s only three-Michelin-star chef, Anh Sung-jae. B: And the grand prize is $300 million Korean won. A: After watching the show, I really wanna have some Korean food. A: 你有看電視實境秀《黑白大廚:料理階級大戰》嗎? B: 當然啦!就是20位「白湯匙」名廚,和80位「黑湯匙」廚師的競賽。 A: 評審則是廚神白種元,及南韓唯一的米其林三星主廚安成宰。 B: 冠軍還可獲得3億韓元獎金呢! A: 看完節目後我現在好想吃韓式料理喔。 (By Eddy Chang, Taipei Times/台北時報張聖恩)
A: As reality TV show “Culinary Class Wars” causes a sensation, it may be more difficult to make a reservation at the show’s judge Paik Jong-won’s Taipei restaurant, Bornga Korean BBQ. B: The other judge, Anh Sung-jae, also served as a guest chef at Regent Taipei last June. A: Korean food has become a new trend in Taiwan lately, and restaurants such as Samwon Garden are quite popular. B: But that restaurant is so pricey. A: Then try the more affordable places, like my favorite, OKAY Korean BBQ, or others such as Annyeong Korean BBQ and OvenMaru Chicken. A:
Colorado has taken a pioneering move towards protecting consumer privacy in the age of brain-computer interfaces. With the rise of neurotechnology, which involves technology that monitors and interacts with the brain, data privacy concerns are coming to a head. In response to growing anxieties, Colorado has become the first state in the US to pass an amendment that safeguards the privacy of human brainwaves. On April 17, Colorado announced an update to its Privacy Act, which went into effect on August 6. The new Colorado Privacy Act classifies brainwaves as “sensitive personal information,” offering them the same protections that
Continued from yesterday(延續自昨日) https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/lang Neurotechnology used to be limited to scientific labs and hospital settings. However, many new devices that can record consumers’ brainwaves or analyze the brain in other ways have been launched in recent years. Often marketed outside the realm of medical equipment, these devices evade the existing safety and privacy standards for healthcare devices. Experts are raising concerns about this lack of oversight, fearing the potential for these tools to become mind-reading devices without users’ consent or knowledge. Other US states are considering similar regulations to protect their citizens in regard to neuro data gathered by technology companies. Colorado’s