A new policy voted in by the San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors has sparked controversy. The city is now allowing the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) to utilize robots that can administer deadly force. Though shocking, the use of these robots is not unprecedented. In 2016, a robot armed with explosives was used in Dallas, Texas to kill a sniper who had taken the lives of several officers. Praise was given to the Dallas police chief for handling the situation efficiently. Nevertheless, critics of the decision claim that the police did not make a sufficient effort to find alternatives before deploying the robot. With the new policy, the SFPD has become the center of a heated debate.
Advocates of the policy state that with the rise of mass shootings across the US, better solutions must be put in place in order to protect the public and the police. Equipping remotely controlled robots with the ability to contact and incapacitate dangerous suspects is a necessary step in this solution. Furthermore, the new policy would authorize the use of lethal force only in extreme situations where there is an imminent risk to the lives of the public or officers. Approval must also be granted by certain high-ranking officers beforehand.
Several activist groups are strongly against the new policy, asserting that this action will further militarize the US police force. Opponents of the policy fear that by physically distancing themselves from the violence, the police would be more likely to use lethal force, even when it’s not required. Critics say that although the intention of the policy is to protect, an abuse of power could be the actual result.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons / 照片：維基共享資源提供
Whatever the situation is, the police must act ethically and with the utmost respect for human life. While certain scenarios may arise where the robots are considered necessary, their usage could set a very dangerous precedent.
舊金山市議會表決通過一項新的政策引發了爭議。該市現在允許舊金山警察局（SFPD）使用可以執行致命武力的機器人。儘管令人震驚，但這些機器人的使用並非史無前例。西元2016年，在德州達拉斯，一台裝載炸藥的機器人被用來殺死一名奪走數名警官生命的狙擊手。達拉斯警察局長有效地處理了這一情況，受到了讚揚。然而，該決策的批評者聲稱，警方在部署機器人之前沒有做出足夠的努力來尋找替代方案。隨著新通過的政策，SFPD成了激烈爭論的中心。
該政策的倡導者表示，隨著美國各地大規模槍擊事件的增多，必須制定更好的解決方案以保護大眾和警察。為遙控機器人配備能力，使其能夠接觸危險嫌疑人並讓他們喪失行為能力是該解決方案的必要步驟。此外，新政策將授權僅在大眾或官員的生命面臨迫在眉睫的危險的極端情況下使用致命武力。且還須事先獲得某些高層官員的批准。
一些社運團體強烈反對這項新政策，主張這一行動將進一步使美國的警力軍事化。該政策的反對者擔心，藉著在身體上與暴力保持距離，警察將更有可能使用致命武力，即使在不需要時也是如此。批評者說，雖然該政策的目的是保護，但濫用權力可能才是實際結果。
無論情況如何，警察都必須以符合道德的方式行事，並最大限度地尊重人的生命。雖然在某些情況下可能會發生機器人被認為是必要使用的，但它們的使用可能會開創一個極危險的先例。
MORE INFORMATION
unprecedented adj. 史無前例的；絕無僅有的
sniper n. 狙擊手
incapacitate vt. (使)喪失能力
imminent adj. 即將發生的
militarize vt . 軍事化
utmost adj. 最大的；極度的
precedent n. 先例；判例
KEY VOCABULARY
1. utilize vt. 使用；利用
The artist utilized a variety of painting techniques to create his masterpiece.
那名藝術家利用多樣的繪畫技巧來創造他的傑作。
2. administer v. 實施；管理
The doctors at the hospital were trained in how to administer the new cancer treatment.
該院的醫師受過如何施行新癌症療法的訓練。
3. deploy v. 部署；有效運用；展開
The army deployed soldiers to the border because there was a threat of invasion from another country.
軍隊將士兵部署到邊境，因為有來自另一個國家的入侵威脅。
4. advocate n. 倡導者；擁護人
I spent last summer as an advocate for groups who organize beach cleanups around Taiwan.
去年夏天我為一些組織臺灣地區淨灘活動的團體當倡導者。
5. authorize vt. 授權；批准
James authorized that bank to send payment to the electricity company to pay his bills.
詹姆士授權該銀行向電力公司匯款以支付他的帳單。
6. lethal adj. 致命的；極危險的
Be careful while holding this snake because its bite carries a lethal venom.
捉這種蛇時要小心，因為牠咬人時帶有致命的毒液。
7. beforehand adv. 事先
If you want to travel by train, it’s a good idea to book your ticket beforehand to ensure you get a seat.
如果你想搭乘火車旅行，最好提前訂票以確保你有座位。
8. assert vt. 主張；斷言
The government asserts that its changes to taxes will not make people poorer.
政府主張其稅制改革不會讓人民變得更窮。
9. opponent n. 反對者；對手
Opponents of the new labor law claim it will result in companies shifting production overseas.
這項新勞動法的反對者聲稱它將會導致公司將生產轉移至海外。
學習音檔: https://magazine.english4u.net/Magdata/menu/0o3lv
《空中美語》雜誌APP免費下載: https://www.english4u.net/apps/index.aspx
免費收聽當月《空中美語》雜誌課文朗讀及解析 !
文章由AMC空中美語授權使用: https://www.english4u.net
Historians are rethinking the way the Holocaust is being presented in museums as the world marks the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the last Nazi concentration camps this month. Shocking images of the mass killings of Jews were “used massively at the end of World War II to show the violence of the Nazis,” historian Tal Bruttmann, a specialist on the Holocaust, told AFP. But in doing so “we kind of lost sight of the fact that is not normal to show” such graphic scenes of mass murder, of people being humiliated and dehumanized, he said. Up to this
When people listen to music today, they typically use streaming services like YouTube or Spotify. However, traditional formats like vinyl records have regained popularity in recent times. Vinyl records are circular discs that store music in grooves on their surfaces and are played on a turntable. As the turntable’s needle runs along these grooves, it picks up vibrations and translates them into sound. The history of vinyl records dates back to the late 1800s, but material and technological challenges delayed mass production until the 1950s. Despite early versions having short playtimes and poor sound quality, vinyl records introduced a new era
A: Brazilian jiu-jitsu, known as “BJJ,” has become more and more popular. Even Hollywood stars like Halle Berry and Tom Hardy are obsessed with it. B: Some Asian stars, such as Taiwanese actor Eddie Peng and South Korean actor Lee Joon-gi, have also practiced this martial art. A: BJJ is not just a martial art, but also a combat sport. B: I’ve always wanted to try it, but I’m worried about getting injured. A: Diana Wang, a US doctor of physical therapy, is holding a BJJ seminar at PMA Brazilian Jiu-jitsu in Taipei Friday night. Let’s go check out how we
Dos & Don’ts — 想想看，這句話英語該怎麼說？ 1. 能做的事都做了。 ˇ All that could be done has been done. χ All that could be done have been done. 註︰all 指事情或抽象概念時當作單數。例如： All is well that ends well. （結果好就是好。） All is over with him. （他已經沒希望了。） That’s all for today. （今天到此為止。） all 指人時應當作複數。例如： All of us are interested in his proposal. All of us are doing our best. 2. 我們這麼做有益於我們的健康。 ˇ What we are doing is good for our health. χ What we are doing are good for our health. 註︰以關係代名詞 what 引導的作為主詞的子句，動詞用單數。如： What he said is true. 3. 大家都沿著步道跑。 ˇ Everybody runs along the trail. χ Everybody run along the trail. 註︰everyone 是指一大群人，但在文法上一般用單數。 4. 桌上有一本筆記本和兩支筆。 ˇ There were two
RSS