A new policy voted in by the San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors has sparked controversy. The city is now allowing the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) to utilize robots that can administer deadly force. Though shocking, the use of these robots is not unprecedented. In 2016, a robot armed with explosives was used in Dallas, Texas to kill a sniper who had taken the lives of several officers. Praise was given to the Dallas police chief for handling the situation efficiently. Nevertheless, critics of the decision claim that the police did not make a sufficient effort to find alternatives before deploying the robot. With the new policy, the SFPD has become the center of a heated debate.
Advocates of the policy state that with the rise of mass shootings across the US, better solutions must be put in place in order to protect the public and the police. Equipping remotely controlled robots with the ability to contact and incapacitate dangerous suspects is a necessary step in this solution. Furthermore, the new policy would authorize the use of lethal force only in extreme situations where there is an imminent risk to the lives of the public or officers. Approval must also be granted by certain high-ranking officers beforehand.
Several activist groups are strongly against the new policy, asserting that this action will further militarize the US police force. Opponents of the policy fear that by physically distancing themselves from the violence, the police would be more likely to use lethal force, even when it’s not required. Critics say that although the intention of the policy is to protect, an abuse of power could be the actual result.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons / 照片：維基共享資源提供
Whatever the situation is, the police must act ethically and with the utmost respect for human life. While certain scenarios may arise where the robots are considered necessary, their usage could set a very dangerous precedent.
舊金山市議會表決通過一項新的政策引發了爭議。該市現在允許舊金山警察局（SFPD）使用可以執行致命武力的機器人。儘管令人震驚，但這些機器人的使用並非史無前例。西元2016年，在德州達拉斯，一台裝載炸藥的機器人被用來殺死一名奪走數名警官生命的狙擊手。達拉斯警察局長有效地處理了這一情況，受到了讚揚。然而，該決策的批評者聲稱，警方在部署機器人之前沒有做出足夠的努力來尋找替代方案。隨著新通過的政策，SFPD成了激烈爭論的中心。
該政策的倡導者表示，隨著美國各地大規模槍擊事件的增多，必須制定更好的解決方案以保護大眾和警察。為遙控機器人配備能力，使其能夠接觸危險嫌疑人並讓他們喪失行為能力是該解決方案的必要步驟。此外，新政策將授權僅在大眾或官員的生命面臨迫在眉睫的危險的極端情況下使用致命武力。且還須事先獲得某些高層官員的批准。
一些社運團體強烈反對這項新政策，主張這一行動將進一步使美國的警力軍事化。該政策的反對者擔心，藉著在身體上與暴力保持距離，警察將更有可能使用致命武力，即使在不需要時也是如此。批評者說，雖然該政策的目的是保護，但濫用權力可能才是實際結果。
無論情況如何，警察都必須以符合道德的方式行事，並最大限度地尊重人的生命。雖然在某些情況下可能會發生機器人被認為是必要使用的，但它們的使用可能會開創一個極危險的先例。
MORE INFORMATION
unprecedented adj. 史無前例的；絕無僅有的
sniper n. 狙擊手
incapacitate vt. (使)喪失能力
imminent adj. 即將發生的
militarize vt . 軍事化
utmost adj. 最大的；極度的
precedent n. 先例；判例
KEY VOCABULARY
1. utilize vt. 使用；利用
The artist utilized a variety of painting techniques to create his masterpiece.
那名藝術家利用多樣的繪畫技巧來創造他的傑作。
2. administer v. 實施；管理
The doctors at the hospital were trained in how to administer the new cancer treatment.
該院的醫師受過如何施行新癌症療法的訓練。
3. deploy v. 部署；有效運用；展開
The army deployed soldiers to the border because there was a threat of invasion from another country.
軍隊將士兵部署到邊境，因為有來自另一個國家的入侵威脅。
4. advocate n. 倡導者；擁護人
I spent last summer as an advocate for groups who organize beach cleanups around Taiwan.
去年夏天我為一些組織臺灣地區淨灘活動的團體當倡導者。
5. authorize vt. 授權；批准
James authorized that bank to send payment to the electricity company to pay his bills.
詹姆士授權該銀行向電力公司匯款以支付他的帳單。
6. lethal adj. 致命的；極危險的
Be careful while holding this snake because its bite carries a lethal venom.
捉這種蛇時要小心，因為牠咬人時帶有致命的毒液。
7. beforehand adv. 事先
If you want to travel by train, it’s a good idea to book your ticket beforehand to ensure you get a seat.
如果你想搭乘火車旅行，最好提前訂票以確保你有座位。
8. assert vt. 主張；斷言
The government asserts that its changes to taxes will not make people poorer.
政府主張其稅制改革不會讓人民變得更窮。
9. opponent n. 反對者；對手
Opponents of the new labor law claim it will result in companies shifting production overseas.
這項新勞動法的反對者聲稱它將會導致公司將生產轉移至海外。
學習音檔: https://magazine.english4u.net/Magdata/menu/0o3lv
《空中美語》雜誌APP免費下載: https://www.english4u.net/apps/index.aspx
免費收聽當月《空中美語》雜誌課文朗讀及解析 !
文章由AMC空中美語授權使用: https://www.english4u.net
It’s likely that you may know someone who has had their appendix removed, or at least you’ve heard of the operation. An appendectomy is typically performed when the appendix, a small pouch next to the intestines, becomes inflamed or infected, leading to severe pain and potential complications if left untreated. Fortunately, the procedure is very safe today, and patients can go on to live normal lives without their appendix. Yet, it still begs the question of how humans can continue living without an organ. The human body is full of various parts that scientists still don’t completely understand, and
Wisdom teeth are another example of vestigial organs. Why do humans have wisdom teeth? One theory suggests that they were originally intended to help support muscles and tissues in the human face. Another theory indicates that they were initially meant to aid our ancestors in chewing certain tough foods that grew in the wild. As our diets have softened with processed foods, these teeth may become less necessary. Removing one’s wisdom teeth can feel like a rite of passage for many young adults. At some point in their late teens to early twenties, most people will have up to
Despite being thoroughly prepared for the coming exam, Sarah couldn’t stop herself from thinking about what could go wrong on test day. So, she kept studying her textbooks again and again. Do you often find yourself caught in this same type of loop, endlessly thinking about scenarios? If so, you’re likely struggling with a common challenge: overthinking. Overthinking is a phenomenon in which individuals become trapped in a tangle of worries, continuously replaying past events in their mind or feeling uneasy about what the future holds. It’s like being stuck in a never-ending loop of negative thoughts that can prove challenging
Ford Motor Co. says it will reduce its workforce by 4,000 in Europe and the UK by the end of 2027, citing headwinds from the economy and pressure from increased competition and weaker than expected sales of electric cars. Ford said Wednesday last week most of the job cuts would come in Germany and would be carried out in consultation with employee representatives. Of the total, 2,900 jobs would be lost in Germany, 800 in Britain and 300 in other European Union countries. Ford has 28,000 employees in Europe, and 174,000 worldwide. “The global auto industry continues to be in a period of
RSS