Clean energy has become so inexpensive, and climate policy aspirations so common, that together they can potentially lower projected global warming to 1.7°C above pre-industrial levels in 2100, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).
In a research note published Thursday last week, the IEA stressed that time is running out to avoid the worst effects of climate change. Despite a temporary drop at the height of the pandemic in 2020, global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions rose to a record high of 36.8 billion metric tons in 2022, it said. “The window to a credible pathway towards limiting warming to 1.5°C in 2100 is therefore rapidly closing,” the authors wrote, referring to the Paris Agreement’s stretch goal for containing global temperature rise.
The report’s release coincides with the Major Economies Forum in Washington, which will be attended by countries responsible for 80 percent of global gross domestic product and greenhouse gas emissions. US President Joe Biden used the platform to drum up ambition for more aggressive pollution cuts and more finance to help developing countries build clean infrastructure.
Photo: AFP 照片:法新社
The IEA outlined four necessary thrusts of immediate policy and investment that are needed to prevent dangerous global warming by 2100. Its major conclusions assumed that governments will completely meet all their climate pledges on time — even though “limited policies are to date in place to deliver on them,” a United Nations science panel recently wrote.
First, the energy sector needs to generate more electricity with clean sources, ramp up efficiency and electrify gas-guzzlers such as vehicles and home boilers. By 2030, renewable energy installations need to triple from the record 275 terawatt-hours deployed in 2022. Electric cars, which made up 14% of sales last year, need to win 60% of market share by the end of the decade.
Countries must eliminate deforestation by 2030, as 145 of them pledged to do at UN climate negotiations in Glasgow in 2021. Agriculture, forestry and other land uses make up about a fifth of greenhouse gas pollution, mostly from methane and nitrous oxide.
Photo courtesy of Tainan City Government 照片:台南市政府提供
Non-CO2 greenhouse gases from industry and agriculture must fall at least as fast as planned in the 2016 UN pact reached in Kigali, Rwanda, which targets refrigerant gases that trap heat in the atmosphere.
Finally, the IEA said that countries must move faster to install carbon-capture and storage infrastructure for polluting industrial facilities and build operations to suck CO2 directly out of the air. The 300 million metric tons of CO2 that is projected to be captured in 2030 must rise fourfold by 2100 in the IEA’s most aggressive net-zero scenario.
(Bloomberg)
國際能源署的資料顯示,清潔能源已變得很便宜,對氣候政策的期待也已很普遍,這些因素加起來,有可能達到預期目標,將全球暖化在2100年降到比工業化前的溫度高攝氏1.7度。
國際能源署在上週四發布的一份研究報告中強調,避免氣候變化最糟結果的時間不多了。報告說,2022年全球與能源相關的二氧化碳排放量升至368億公噸的歷史新高,即便在2020年疫情最嚴重時暫時下降。「因此,通往2100年升溫不超過攝氏1.5度之可靠途徑的窗口正迅速關閉」,該報告寫道。2100年升溫不超過攝氏1.5度,是《巴黎協定》遏制全球氣溫上升的延伸目標。
該報告的發布適逢主要經濟體論壇在華盛頓召開,出席該論壇的國家,其國內生產總值與溫室氣體排放量佔全球總量的80%。美國總統喬‧拜登利用該論壇平台鼓吹更積極地減少污染,以及提供更多資金以幫助發展中國家建設清潔基礎設施的雄心。
國際能源署概述了四項即時政策和投資的必要目標,以便能夠在2100年前避免危險的全球暖化。其主要結論假設各國政府將按時完全履行其所有氣候承諾—儘管「迄今他們為達到此目標所制定的政策有限」,一個聯合國科學小組最近寫道。
首先,能源部門需要以清潔能源生產更多電力、提高效率,並為汽車和家用鍋爐等耗油量大的設備供電。到了2030年,再生能源裝置需要比2022年部署的創紀錄的2,750億度電增加兩倍。電動汽車去年佔銷售額的14%,到了2020年代晚期,市占率要達60%才行。
各國必須在2030年之前杜絕森林濫伐,有145個國家在2021年格拉斯哥聯合國氣候談判中承諾做到這一點。農業、林業和其他土地利用約佔溫室氣體污染的五分之一,這些溫室氣體主要是甲烷和一氧化二氮。
工業及農業產生的非二氧化碳溫室氣體,必須至少依2016年聯合國在盧安達基加利達成的協議中所計劃的速度下降,該協議所針對的是在大氣中吸收熱能的冷媒。
最後,國際能源署表示,各國必須加快行動,為污染工業設施安裝碳捕獲及儲存的基礎設施,並建造設施,直接從空氣中吸除二氧化碳。在國際能源署最積極的淨零情景下,預計到2030年要補獲的3億公噸的二氧化碳,到了2100年,必須增加四倍。
(台北時報林俐凱編譯)
A: Have you seen the reality TV show “Culinary Class Wars?” B: Sure! It’s a competition between two classes: 20 celebrity chefs dubbed the “white spoons” versus 80 non-celebrity chefs dubbed the “black spoons.” A: The two judges are master chef, Paik Jong-won, and South Korea’s only three-Michelin-star chef, Anh Sung-jae. B: And the grand prize is $300 million Korean won. A: After watching the show, I really wanna have some Korean food. A: 你有看電視實境秀《黑白大廚:料理階級大戰》嗎? B: 當然啦!就是20位「白湯匙」名廚,和80位「黑湯匙」廚師的競賽。 A: 評審則是廚神白種元,及南韓唯一的米其林三星主廚安成宰。 B: 冠軍還可獲得3億韓元獎金呢! A: 看完節目後我現在好想吃韓式料理喔。 (By Eddy Chang, Taipei Times/台北時報張聖恩)
A: As reality TV show “Culinary Class Wars” causes a sensation, it may be more difficult to make a reservation at the show’s judge Paik Jong-won’s Taipei restaurant, Bornga Korean BBQ. B: The other judge, Anh Sung-jae, also served as a guest chef at Regent Taipei last June. A: Korean food has become a new trend in Taiwan lately, and restaurants such as Samwon Garden are quite popular. B: But that restaurant is so pricey. A: Then try the more affordable places, like my favorite, OKAY Korean BBQ, or others such as Annyeong Korean BBQ and OvenMaru Chicken. A:
Colorado has taken a pioneering move towards protecting consumer privacy in the age of brain-computer interfaces. With the rise of neurotechnology, which involves technology that monitors and interacts with the brain, data privacy concerns are coming to a head. In response to growing anxieties, Colorado has become the first state in the US to pass an amendment that safeguards the privacy of human brainwaves. On April 17, Colorado announced an update to its Privacy Act, which went into effect on August 6. The new Colorado Privacy Act classifies brainwaves as “sensitive personal information,” offering them the same protections that
Continued from yesterday(延續自昨日) https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/lang Neurotechnology used to be limited to scientific labs and hospital settings. However, many new devices that can record consumers’ brainwaves or analyze the brain in other ways have been launched in recent years. Often marketed outside the realm of medical equipment, these devices evade the existing safety and privacy standards for healthcare devices. Experts are raising concerns about this lack of oversight, fearing the potential for these tools to become mind-reading devices without users’ consent or knowledge. Other US states are considering similar regulations to protect their citizens in regard to neuro data gathered by technology companies. Colorado’s