Finland became the 31st member of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), completing a tumultuous process of accession sparked by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that upended the European security landscape.
Foreign Minister Pekka Haavisto handed Finland’s accession document to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Brussels on Tuesday last week, marking its formal entry into the alliance’s fold. NATO foreign ministers celebrated the accession with a flag-raising ceremony later in the day.
The accession of just one of the two Nordic countries — Sweden’s application is pending — will make the alliance’s northern enlargement incomplete as NATO seeks to boost its presence in the Arctic, with the High North area’s significance increasing, as well as to gain more clout in the Baltic Sea.
Photo: AP 照片:美聯社
Finland’s addition will bring NATO more than 1,300km of border with Russia, doubling its eastern flank, and a nation that’s already prepared to defend itself in case of an all-out war. For the Finnish military, membership is a culmination of years of ever-closer cooperation, with gear used by the defense forces already compatible with that of the alliance.
The push to join NATO was triggered by Russia’s attack on a neighboring country, Ukraine, leading to a U-turn in public opinion on membership as Finns concluded that could also happen to them.
As a full member, Finland can benefit from Article 5 mutual defense commitments — meaning allies are bound to come to its aid if it’s under attack — and the Nordic country will have to be ready to defend other allies, too.
The Finnish entry is set to enable the bloc to further secure the area around the Baltic Sea in defense of its members Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, which are often seen as potential targets of Russian aggression. It also brings another Arctic nation into the fold of the alliance, one whose military is trained for cold weather — an important asset at a time when the High North is gaining in strategic importance in light of the increased presence of Russia and China.
Having won independence in 1917 after more than 100 years as a Grand Duchy of the Russian Empire, Finns fought two wars with the Soviet Union, ceding parts of their territory in 1944. Finland then tiptoed through an era of neutrality during the Cold War — by necessity, not by choice — cowering to Moscow while retaining independence in a policy that came to be known as Finlandization.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Nordic country immediately sought entry into the European fold in Sweden’s wake, with the two joining the European Union in 1995. Until last year, Finnish policy makers almost never identified Russia — at least publicly — as the primary military threat.
Geared for survival, the country of 5.5 million people has always remained on alert. It’s able to deploy 280,000 troops in wartime from a trained reserve just short of a million, thanks to a conscription-based system where most men and some women undergo military training lasting from six months to a year.
(Bloomberg)
芬蘭成為北大西洋公約組織第31個成員國,為芬蘭入盟過程的紛紛擾擾畫下句點。俄國入侵烏克蘭讓歐洲安全格局大亂陣腳,芬蘭加入北約之舉亦由此引發。
芬蘭外交部長佩卡‧哈維斯托上週二在布魯塞爾將芬蘭的入盟文件交給美國國務卿安東尼‧布林肯,代表芬蘭正式加入北約。北約外長們在當天稍晚舉行升旗儀式慶祝芬蘭的加入。
芬蘭與瑞典這兩個北歐國家皆申請加入北約,但瑞典仍未獲准加入,這將使北約的向北擴張變得不完整,因為北極圈地區的重要性增加,北約想在北極更具存在感,並在波羅的海更有影響力。
芬蘭的加入將使北約與俄國的邊界逾1,300公里,將其東翼擴大一倍,且若全面開戰,芬蘭已做好自衛的準備。對芬蘭軍方來說,加入北約是多年來密切合作的結果,國防軍使用的裝備已經與北約的裝備相容。
推動加入北約是因俄國攻擊鄰國烏克蘭,而使公眾輿論對於加入北約發生了大轉彎,因為芬蘭人認為這也可能會發生在他們身上。
作為北約正式成員,芬蘭可受益於北約第5條款所承諾的共同防禦——這表示若芬蘭受到攻擊,盟邦必會提供援助——而芬蘭這北歐國家也必須準備好保衛其他盟友。
芬蘭的加入將使北約集團能進一步保護波羅的海周圍地區的安全,以保衛北約成員國愛沙尼亞、拉脫維亞與立陶宛,這些國家常被視為俄國侵略的潛在目標。芬蘭的加入也表示又一北極國家入北約,芬蘭的軍隊受過寒冷天氣的訓練——在俄國與中國影響力增加,北極圈地區的戰略重要性越來越高的情況下,這是一項重要資產。
作為隸屬於俄羅斯帝國的芬蘭大公國一百多年後,芬蘭人於1917年贏得獨立,並與蘇聯打了兩場戰爭,在1944年割讓了部分領土。芬蘭之後在冷戰期間小心翼翼地保持中立——這是迫不得已,而非出於選擇——順從莫斯科而得以保持獨立,這也就是後來被稱為「芬蘭化」的政策。
蘇聯解體後,芬蘭立即跟隨瑞典尋求加入歐洲集團,兩國於1995年加入歐盟。在去年之前,芬蘭的決策者幾乎從未將俄國認定——起碼未公開認定——為主要軍事威脅。
為了生存,這個人口數550萬人的國家始終保持警覺。芬蘭實施徵兵制,大多數男性及部分女性接受為期六個月至一年的軍事訓練,因此戰時能夠在訓練有素、為數近一百萬的預備役中部署28萬名士兵。
(台北時報林俐凱編譯)
A: Have you seen the reality TV show “Culinary Class Wars?” B: Sure! It’s a competition between two classes: 20 celebrity chefs dubbed the “white spoons” versus 80 non-celebrity chefs dubbed the “black spoons.” A: The two judges are master chef, Paik Jong-won, and South Korea’s only three-Michelin-star chef, Anh Sung-jae. B: And the grand prize is $300 million Korean won. A: After watching the show, I really wanna have some Korean food. A: 你有看電視實境秀《黑白大廚:料理階級大戰》嗎? B: 當然啦!就是20位「白湯匙」名廚,和80位「黑湯匙」廚師的競賽。 A: 評審則是廚神白種元,及南韓唯一的米其林三星主廚安成宰。 B: 冠軍還可獲得3億韓元獎金呢! A: 看完節目後我現在好想吃韓式料理喔。 (By Eddy Chang, Taipei Times/台北時報張聖恩)
A: As reality TV show “Culinary Class Wars” causes a sensation, it may be more difficult to make a reservation at the show’s judge Paik Jong-won’s Taipei restaurant, Bornga Korean BBQ. B: The other judge, Anh Sung-jae, also served as a guest chef at Regent Taipei last June. A: Korean food has become a new trend in Taiwan lately, and restaurants such as Samwon Garden are quite popular. B: But that restaurant is so pricey. A: Then try the more affordable places, like my favorite, OKAY Korean BBQ, or others such as Annyeong Korean BBQ and OvenMaru Chicken. A:
Colorado has taken a pioneering move towards protecting consumer privacy in the age of brain-computer interfaces. With the rise of neurotechnology, which involves technology that monitors and interacts with the brain, data privacy concerns are coming to a head. In response to growing anxieties, Colorado has become the first state in the US to pass an amendment that safeguards the privacy of human brainwaves. On April 17, Colorado announced an update to its Privacy Act, which went into effect on August 6. The new Colorado Privacy Act classifies brainwaves as “sensitive personal information,” offering them the same protections that
Continued from yesterday(延續自昨日) https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/lang Neurotechnology used to be limited to scientific labs and hospital settings. However, many new devices that can record consumers’ brainwaves or analyze the brain in other ways have been launched in recent years. Often marketed outside the realm of medical equipment, these devices evade the existing safety and privacy standards for healthcare devices. Experts are raising concerns about this lack of oversight, fearing the potential for these tools to become mind-reading devices without users’ consent or knowledge. Other US states are considering similar regulations to protect their citizens in regard to neuro data gathered by technology companies. Colorado’s