Global targets aimed at warding off runaway planetary warming could be breached sooner than expected, experts warned Monday, as gases released by melting permafrost threaten to undermine human efforts to avert climate disaster.
Under the current rescue plan, outlined in the 2015 Paris climate treaty, countries have agreed to limit global temperature rises to “well below” two degrees Celsius, and 1.5 degrees if deemed possible. That course of action assumes that dealing with manmade greenhouse gases — whether by slowing their emissions or removing them from the atmosphere — will be enough to bring global warming under control.
What climate models do not allow for are scenarios in which Earth begins to contribute to the problem, new research shows. A team of experts from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Austria said Monday they had for the first time included projected emissions from melting permafrost in global climate change models, and the results prompted concern. “Permafrost carbon release is caused by global warming, and will certainly diminish the budget of CO2 we can emit while staying below a certain level of global warming,” said IIASA research scholar and lead study author Thomas Gasser.
Photo: AFP
照片：法新社
As reliance on fossil fuels persists, scientists have calculated that we are likely to overshoot the Paris temperature targets in the short to medium term. With only one degree of warming above pre-industrial levels so far, the world’s permafrost is already thawing, albeit slowly. But the rate of that melting is sure to accelerate as Earth continues to heat up.
Gasser warned that the overshoot scenario would leave the planet even more vulnerable to permafrost emissions and, in a vicious feedback loop, even more warming. In fact, under some models run in the study, published in the journal Nature Geoscience, we have already missed the 1.5 degrees target as a result of permafrost emissions.
Methane and CO2 trapped in the frozen wastes of Russia, Canada and northern Europe are roughly equivalent to 15 years of manmade emissions at today’s level. The problem with the Paris goals, according to Gasser, is that they set emissions targets based on the assumption that global temperature and atmospheric CO2 levels change in lock-step. They therefore allow countries to exceed the targets on the condition that enough carbon can be captured from the air to bring temperatures back down by the end of the century.
But permafrost is subject to what scientists call a “tipping point,” meaning that beyond a certain temperature threshold, it will continue to melt and release greenhouse gases in a self-perpetuating feedback loop independent of falling emission levels. The models will not have accounted for these additional greenhouse gases, mainly methane and carbon dioxide.
As the world struggles to curb manmade carbon pollution that amplifies the likelihood and intensity of deadly superstorms, heatwaves and droughts, Monday’s study will add to fears that Earth itself could overwhelm efforts to limit climate change. Other possible climate tipping points include melting sea ice, which creates seawater that absorbs rather than reflects sunlight, and forest dieback — which would see billions of tonnes of carbon released as CO2-absorbing biomass is lost.
(AFP)
正當全球設定目標，企圖遏止失控的地球暖化，專家週一發布警示，指出該目標可能比預期還要快遭到破壞，因為融化的永凍層釋放出氣體，可能暗中威脅人類為防止氣候災害所做的努力。
眼下的拯救計畫乃按照二○一五年的巴黎氣候協定，世界各國同意限制全球氣溫升幅「遠低於」攝氏兩度，並在可能情況下控制在攝氏一點五度之內。該行動方向假定妥善處理人為排放的溫室氣體──無論是減低排放量，還是從大氣層中移除溫室氣體──將足以讓全球暖化獲得控制。
然而，新的研究顯示，這些氣候模式並未考慮到地球本身開始造成問題加劇的情況。由奧地利國際應用系統分析研究所（IIASA）專家組成的團隊於週一表示，他們首次將融化中的永凍層預期排放的氣體納入全球氣候變遷模式中，導出結果令人憂心。IIASA學者暨這份研究的主要作者托馬斯‧蓋瑟表示：「永凍層的碳排放是由全球暖化導致，而且當我們將全球暖化程度維持在特定標準以下時，這些氣體一定會縮減我們所能排放二氧化碳的容許值。」
由於人類持續仰賴化石燃料，科學家已算出我們可能會在短期或中期內超出巴黎協定的降溫目標。儘管目前的暖化升幅只比前工業化時期的標準高出攝氏一度，世界各地的永凍層早已開始解凍，只是速度還算緩慢。不過，隨著地球持續增溫，融化速度必然會加快。
蓋瑟警告，超出目標的情況會讓地球變得更為脆弱，更容易受到永凍層排放氣體，以及惡性反饋迴圈造成更嚴重暖化等現象影響。事實上，根據這篇於期刊《自然地球科學》發表的研究，在幾組運算模式中，我們早已因為永凍層排放氣體而無法達到攝氏一點五度的目標。
大量的甲烷與二氧化碳被困在俄國、加拿大、北歐地區的冰凍廢棄物中，總量約等於今日人造溫室氣體排放量的十五年份之多。根據蓋瑟的看法，巴黎協定目標的問題在於假設全球溫度和大氣層的二氧化碳濃度會同步改變，並據此設下排放目標。因此，他們允許各國超過目標，條件是這些國家要能夠從空氣中捕獲足夠的碳，讓氣溫能在這個世紀結束前回到目標值。
然而，永凍層卻是受控於科學家所稱的「臨界點」，也就是說，一旦超過特定溫度門檻，永凍層就會在自行延續的反饋迴圈中持續融化並釋放出溫室氣體，完全獨立於人類逐步降低的排放標準。先前的模式到時候將會無法解釋這些主要由甲烷與二氧化碳構成的額外溫室氣體。
人造碳汙染會增強致命超級颶風、熱浪，以及乾旱發生的可能性與災害強度，但正當世界各國奮力控制汙染的同時，週一的研究卻帶來新的恐懼，亦即地球本身可能吞沒人類遏止氣候變遷的種種努力。其他可能的氣候臨界點還包括海冰融化，製造出更多海水吸收陽光熱能，而非反射陽光，以及森林樹冠頂枯，會因為這類吸收二氧化碳的生物質量消失，而釋放出數十億噸的碳。
（台北時報章厚明譯）
When it comes to movies, some people delight in watching spine-chilling horror films. Surprisingly, apart from containing a few scares, horror movies may also offer an unexpected __1__. According to a study, watching 90 minutes of a scary movie can burn an average of 113 calories, which is roughly __2__ to taking a 30-minute walk. Researchers from the University of Westminster carried out an experiment in which they __3__ participants’ oxygen intake, carbon dioxide output, and heart rates while they were watching horror movies without any distractions. The results revealed that physiological responses to fear play a crucial role
Bilingual Story is a fictionalized account. 雙語故事部分內容純屬虛構。 Echo pulled out a worn and tattered shoe box under father’s large oak desk. “Mariko, what should we do with these family photos?” Mariko stared at the old box with a slightly hurt expression, and then blankly at the photos. “Throw them in the garbage pile. . . along with that old, ratty box,” she murmured. She resented that her father had not cared enough to find a nicer home for the family photos. “Father never really cared about me anyway.” Echo’s emotion sensor detected sorrow. ”Mariko, that is
In the vast landscapes of Australia, a unique and charming creature roams — the “wombat.” These round, adorable animals possess surprising abilities and fascinating traits that never fail to amaze. Let’s explore the world of this remarkable creature. Wombats are marsupials native to Australia, measuring around one meter in length and weighing between 20 and 35kg. Their fur varies in color, ranging from brown to gray to black. As herbivores, they primarily feed on grass, bark and roots. To adapt to Australia’s weather conditions, wombats have developed a slow metabolism and a leisurely pace. However, despite their bulky appearance,
Dos & Don’ts — 想想看，這句話英語該怎麼說？ 1. 你覺得這部電影怎樣？ ˇ What do you think of the movie? χ How do you like the movie? χ How do you think of the movie? 註︰What do you think of ＝ What is your opinion of。 think 的受詞是 what，不能用 how。 2. 你認為哪一個歌星唱得最好？ ˇ Which singer do you think is the best? χ Do you think which singer is the best? 註︰英語中 which singer 似乎是 do you think 的受詞，實則 do you think 是插入語，其他例子如下： 你以為他喜歡誰？ Who do you think he likes? 你以為我住在哪裏？ Where do you think I live? 你想我昨天在公園裏碰到了誰？ Whom/Who do you think I met in the park yesterday? 3. 他不論到什麼地方，總是帶著一把雨傘。 ˇ No matter where he goes, he
RSS