Chinese practice
胸有成竹
to have fully-formed bamboo in the mind
Photo: Wikimedia Commons
照片:維基共享資源
(xiong1 you3 cheng2 zhu2)
蘇軾(西元一○三七~一一○一年)又名蘇東坡,為北宋詩人、書法家及政治家。他在〈文與可畫篔簹谷偃竹記〉(一○七九年作)中寫道:
「故畫竹,必先得成竹於胸中,執筆熟視,乃見其所欲畫者,急起從之,振筆直遂,以追其所見,如兔起鶻落,少縱即逝矣。」(所以說畫竹,心裡一定先要有完整的竹子,拿著筆凝神而視,就能看到自己心裡想要畫的竹子了。這時快速地跟著自己的所見去畫,去捕捉看到的形象,就像兔子躍起、鶻鳥降落一樣迅速。)
蘇軾此文標題所提到的文與可,即蘇軾的朋友及表兄文同(西元一○一九~一○七九年),他是著名學者、藝術家及書法家,今有繪畫作品《墨竹》傳世,享有盛名。據載,文同對竹子有極精到的了解和知識:他居於竹林中,閒暇時便在竹林間漫步,仔細觀察竹子的生長方式、竹葉的形狀和姿態、竹葉與細枝莖幹的交錯等細節,甚至竹筍是如何生長。一回到家,他就立刻用筆墨把所觀察到的畫在紙上,把竹子的樣貌極為忠實地演繹出來──正如蘇軾所寫的,文同「成竹於胸中」(在心中形成竹子的全貌)──此即為成語「胸有成竹」的由來,意為對要做的事有充分的準備。
英文中有一個說法「winging it」,其概念(至少是表面上的概念)和「胸有成竹」恰恰相反。
此處的wing一字,並非指鳥或飛機的翼或建築的廂房,而是指劇場舞台兩旁觀眾看不到的區域。若演員因種種原因沒把台詞記牢,他們就會站在舞台側翼臨時抱佛腳,或是就直接上台,然後由他人在舞臺側翼幫忙提示台詞。
一八八五年的英國《舞臺》雜誌將wing這個動詞定義如下:
「to wing指的是不知道台詞卻仍能演出該角色。之所以使用wing這個字,是因為藝人常需要提詞人的幫助,提詞人藏身之處便是在布景後面或在舞台側翼。」
雖然「winging it」這個說法源自英國,但把它當作成語來用的可能是美國人──美國《君子》雜誌在一九五九年將「to wing」定義為「做事沒有準備」。
我們可能事前只做了一點點準備,就去「wing」一場簡報、面試或授課。但是,如同《舞台》雜誌的定義所暗示的,即使沒什麼準備,表演者憑其熟練的技巧及一定的經驗,還是能夠順利完成任務。
(台北時報林俐凱譯)
她已經準備了很久,面對這場考試可說是胸有成竹、信心滿滿。
(She had been studying for this exam for ages, and was throughly prepared and brimming with confidence.)
教練這次對於球隊晉級胸有成竹,最後果然不負眾望旗開得勝。
(The coach had thoroughly prepared the team, and the final result was just as he’d hoped: They were victorious.)
英文練習
to wing it
The Northern Song Dynasty poet, calligrapher and statesman Su Shi (1037 – 1101), also known as Su Dongpo, wrote, in his 1079 work On Wen Yuke Painting the Bamboo Grove of Yun Dang Valley, the following:
“When painting bamboo, it is imperative to first have the bamboo fully formed in one’s mind, that, in wielding the brush, one can previsualize what it is one intends to paint. The execution is immediate; the brush is instantaneously placed on the silk to render there what has been previsualized, as a falcon swooping the moment the hare emerges, where the moment is lost with the slightest hesitation.”
The Wen Yuke of the title was Su’s friend and cousin, Wen Tong (1019–1079), a renowned scholar, artist and calligrapher, famous now for his work Bamboo in Monochrome Ink. It was said that Wen had an intimate knowledge and understanding of bamboo: That he lived within a bamboo grove, that in his spare time he would stroll among the bamboo, observing the way it grew, the shape and position of the leaves and the minutiae of their interaction with the twigs and stalks, and even how the shoots grew. On returning to his house, he would immediately commit his observations to paper with his ink brush, painting incredibly faithful renditions of bamboo. As Su wrote, Wen had 成竹於胸中 (the bamboo fully formed in his mind), giving us the idiom 胸有成竹, meaning to approach a task thoroughly prepared.
In English, there is the concept of “winging it,” which – at least on its surface – means the opposite of 胸有成竹.
The wing here refers not to that of a bird, plane or building, but the area on either side of the stage in the theater that is out of sight. When actors, for whatever reason, had not committed their lines to memory, they would stand in the wings quickly preparing them, or go on stage and be prompted from the wings.
In an 1885 edition of the British magazine The Stage, the verb was defined thus:
“’To wing’... indicates the capacity to play a role without knowing the text, and the word itself came into use from the fact that the artiste frequently received the assistance of a special prompter, who... stood... screened by a piece of the scenery or a wing.”
Despite the British theatrical origins of “winging it,” it may have been the Americans that made it idiomatic, with Esquire defining “to wing” in 1959 as “to do something without preparation.”
We might “wing” a presentation, interview or class by going into the situation with little prior preparation. However, as the Stage definition indicates, even though there is no preparation as such, there is a suggestion of a learned skill or a certain degree of experience on the part of the person “winging it” to ensure their success.
(Paul Cooper, Taipei Times)
This speech could define your career. It’s not something you should just wing.
(這場演說對你的職涯有決定性影響,不是你可以臨時打鴨子上架的。)
Let’s not book a hotel. Can’t we just turn up and wing it?
(還是不要先訂房好了,我們難道不能到那裡再找旅館嗎?)
Earthquakes are among the most terrifying natural disasters, generating massive tremors and destructive forces as Earth’s crust shudders. These tremors not only lead to the collapse of buildings but can also trigger secondary disasters, such as tsunamis and fires. However, we can mitigate the impact on lives and property by mastering earthquake response techniques. The DCH three-step strategy, recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is crucial during an earthquake. “D” stands for “drop.” You should immediately drop to the ground, using your hands and knees to support yourself. This position prevents you from falling and
A: The newest twist in “Friends” star Matthew Perry’s sudden death is shocking. B: Didn’t he die from a ketamine overdose last year? A: But the police say his death could be a conspiracy. B: Wow, what happened? A: Five suspects have been charged for intentionally supplying him with large amounts of ketamine for personal gain. A: 《六人行》男星馬修派瑞之死大逆轉真令人震驚! B: 他去年不是因吸毒過量致死嗎? A: 但警方說他的死可能是個陰謀。 B: 發生了什麼事? A: 警方已起訴5名嫌犯,他們故意提供大量「K他命」給他,以謀取暴利。 (By Eddy Chang, Taipei Times/台北時報張聖恩)
A: What’s even more horrible is that the five suspects who purposely supplied ketamine to actor Matthew Perry were all his “friends.” B: Who exactly are the five suspects? A: They include Matthew’s two doctors, a broker, a drug dealer, and even his live-in assistant. B: Those scumbags should go to jail. A: Yeah, one of the doctors may be sentenced to up to 120 years in prison. A: 更可怕的是,提供男星馬修派瑞「K他命」的5人全是他的「朋友」。 B: 嫌犯是誰啊? A: 其中包括他的2位醫生、1位仲介、1位毒販、甚至他的同居助理! B: 那些人渣真該去坐牢。 A: 對啊,其中1位醫生可能面臨120年徒刑。 (By Eddy Chang, Taipei Times/台北時報張聖恩)
It’s widely recognized that there are far more right-handed people than left-handed people in the world. Being right-handed simply means preferring to use one’s right hand for tasks that involve only one hand, such as writing and eating. But have you ever wondered about the possible reasons behind the global dominance of the right hand over the left? As with many complex biological questions, multiple factors appear to be at play. First, one reason seems to be genetics. __1__ Therefore, the global dominance of right-handedness is something that has been passed down through many generations of humans. Next,