The Cabinet yesterday approved amendments to marriage laws allowing both spouses to file for divorce if they have been separated for at least three of the past five years, bringing the law in line with a 2023 ruling that found it conditionally unconstitutional to bar the party deemed responsible for the marital issue from filing.
Paragraph 2, Article 1052 of the Civil Code stipulates that a married person cannot file a petition for divorce if they are the sole party responsible for the breakdown of the marriage.
The Constitutional Court on March 24, 2023, ruled that the provision was “overly stringent” and must be amended within two years, as it could be unconstitutional if it deprived the party “responsible” for the marital issue of the right to seek a divorce regardless of how long ago the event occurred, the Ministry of Justice said.
Photo: Taipei Times
Given the ruling, the Cabinet yesterday approved amendments to the Civil Code to allow a petition for divorce by either party in a marriage if they have been separated for at least three of the past five years, the ministry said.
Forbidding a couple to divorce who have been separated for a long time and cannot mend the relationship goes against the spirit of marriage, it said.
The duration of separation to qualify for a divorce petition would be three years, it said, adding that the burden of proof would rest on the petitioner.
To enhance the disclosure of marital property and ensure the right fair division, a party involved in a divorce can ask the other party to provide an inventory and documents, the ministry said.
The Civil Code stipulates that a party involved in a divorce can seek alimony only if they are undergoing a judicial decree of divorce and are not at fault, but such requirements were considered too harsh, it said.
Therefore, the amendments would waive the requirement of “being an innocent party in a judicial decree of divorce” to file an alimony petition, allowing the divorcing party to ask for alimony from the other party if the former had fewer job opportunities while married and would face difficulties after the divorce, it added.
However, alimony might be reduced or waived if the petitioner has abused or unlawfully infringed the rights of their parents-in-law or children, it said.
The right to petition for alimony or non-overdue alimony payments would be canceled if the receiver marries again or passes away, the ministry said.
The amendments also stipulate that the right to petition for alimony would be abolished two years after divorce, it said.
Regarding maintenance obligations, the Civil Code stipulates that younger lineal relatives by blood have greater obligations than their older counterparts, it said.
However, the amendments would combine both into “lineal relatives by blood,” as they are considered equally significant in family relationships and shall have equal obligations, the ministry said.
The amendments are retrospective and would be sent to the legislature for review, it added.
ACCOUNTABILITY: The incident, which occured at a Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Department Store in Taichung, was allegedly caused by a gas explosion on the 12th floor Shin Kong Group (新光集團) president Richard Wu (吳昕陽) yesterday said the company would take responsibility for an apparent gas explosion that resulted in four deaths and 26 injuries at Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Zhonggang Store in Taichung yesterday. The Taichung Fire Bureau at 11:33am yesterday received a report saying that people were injured after an explosion at the department store on Section 3 of Taiwan Boulevard in Taichung’s Situn District (西屯). It sent 56 ambulances and 136 paramedics to the site, with the people injured sent to Cheng Ching Hospital’s Chung Kang Branch, Wuri Lin Shin Hospital, Taichung Veterans General Hospital or Chung
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
RSS