US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday.
Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.”
“China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any actions that might undermine it.”
Photo: AFP
“Fifty percent of commercial container traffic goes through the Taiwan Strait every day; more than 70 percent of the high-end semiconductors that the world needs are produced on Taiwan, so there’s a strong interest around the world on maintaining peace and stability, preserving the status quo, avoiding any kind of conflict that could disrupt things that are so essential to the global economy,” he said.
In Taipei on Thursday morning, Lai said at the nation’s main National Day event that the Republic of China (ROC) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) not being subordinate to each other is an objective fact and the “status quo” across the Taiwan Strait.
He also said that Taiwan is willing to work with China to address climate change, prevent infectious diseases and maintain regional security in pursuit of peace and shared prosperity that would benefit people on both sides.
Former American Institute in Taiwan chair Richard Bush described Lai’s speech as “moderate,” as it did not say much about the PRC military and coercive threats.
However, Bush said he worried that Beijing would not have a positive response based on its “united front” logic and its mistrust of Lai’s Democratic Progressive Party.
Former US National Security Council director for China Rush Doshi on Thursday wrote on X that “Lai has taken a step toward stability.”
“So the question now is whether Beijing wants to respond with escalation or its own restraint,” he said.
Meanwhile, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) urged Beijing to understand the goodwill in Lai’s speech and face mainstream public opinion in Taiwan.
“The so-called one China principle proposed by the Chinese Communist Party does not leave room for the survival of the ROC and has been firmly rejected by the Taiwanese people,” the MAC said.
In line with Lai reaffirming his hope for the resumption of equal, healthy and orderly exchanges between the two sides, Taipei has taken several measures to promote cross-strait exchanges, including providing assistance to Chinese officials and businesses to attend July’s cross-strait summer travel expo in Taipei, it said.
Earlier on Thursday, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Mao Ning (毛寧) said that Lai had tried to “sell the fallacy of Taiwan independence,” and accused him of revealing “his pernicious intention to escalate tensions across the Taiwan Strait for political gain.”
“Lai’s speech deliberately seeks to sever the historical connection between the two sides of the strait and reiterated the rhetoric of mutual non-subordination and insisting on sovereignty,” Mao said.
The “one China” principle says that Taiwan is an indivisible part of China’s territory, she said.
“No matter what Lai’s administration says or does, it cannot change the objective fact that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to one China,” she added.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS