China’s demand that the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) remove a reference to Taiwan from a communique issued on Friday last week is consistent with Beijing’s efforts to limit Taipei’s international participation, a US government spokesperson said on Wednesday.
The 18-member inter-governmental organization held its 53rd summit in Tonga last week. Despite being a nonmember, Taiwan has been a participant as a “development partner” at the annual event since 1993. Taiwan’s status was established based on a 1992 PIF Leaders’ Communique and was reaffirmed in 1999 and 2010.
When the forum wrapped up, the PIF posted a joint communique on its Web site that contained a line reaffirming the decades-long arrangements regarding Taiwan.
Photo: EPA-EFE
“Leaders at the forum reaffirmed the 1992 leaders decision on relations with Taiwan/Republic of China,” the PIF was quoted as saying in paragraph 66 of the communique.
However, later in the day, the communique was removed from the Web site. It was republished the next day, but paragraph 66 about Taiwan is no longer included.
Before the Taiwan reference was removed, New Zealand media participating in the summit reported witnessing Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown, the PIF chairman, promising Chinese Ambassador to the Pacific Qian Bo (錢波) that “we’ll remove it,” referring to the mention of Taiwan in the communique.
Qian told journalists that the reference to Taiwan “must be a mistake” and “must be corrected.”
Soon after, the document was taken down from the Web site, Radio New Zealand reported on Tuesday.
A US Department of State spokesperson told the Central News Agency in an e-mailed response on Wednesday that Washington has been “tracking reports of changes in the forum’s communique to remove references to Taiwan.”
“The PRC’s efforts to pressure Pacific Island countries to remove this reference fit a pattern of PRC coercion to constrain Taiwan’s international position,” the e-mail said, referring to the People’s Republic of China.
The spokesperson wrote that Taiwan is a “highly capable, engaged, democratic and responsible member of the global community.”
“We all stand to benefit from Taiwan’s expertise to address some of today’s most difficult global challenges, and we will continue to support Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations,” they added.
Despite the incident, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that removing the line supporting Taiwan would not affect the nation’s status in the organization or its right to participation.
Asked about the incident during a news conference in Taipei on Tuesday, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Tien Chung-kwang (田中光), who led a delegation to attend a PIF summit side event last week, said he believed the removed portion of the communique was in fact “a draft version and was posted online before it was cleared to be made public.”
The reference to Taiwan only reiterated the 1992 decision, but China still could not accept it and “unreasonably” asked the PIF to remove the paragraph, Tien said.
Also during this year’s summit, the Solomon Islands, a former Taiwan ally that ditched Taipei for Beijing in 2019, proposed preventing Taiwan from attending future PIF events, allegedly on China’s instructions, the ministry said in a press release.
The proposal was later rejected thanks to the support of Taiwan’s three allies in the PIF — the Marshall Islands, Tuvalu and Palau — as well as Australia and New Zealand, the ministry said.
It is expected that Taiwan would face some “difficulties and obstacles” next year when the Solomon Islands hosts the PIF summit, Tien said on Tuesday, without elaborating.
However, Taiwan, a PIF partner for 29 years, would continue to do its best to participate in the organization, he added.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS