Taiwan and the US should invest in low-cost, long-range drones to be deployed en masse in the event of a Taiwan-China military conflict, a US think tank said in a recent report.
In a report titled “Swarms over the Strait: Drone Warfare in a Future Fight to Defend Taiwan,” released on Thursday last week, Washington-based think tank the Center for a New American Security said a diversified fleet of drones could help stave off a Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
“The United States needs a diverse fleet of aerial drones that includes a mix of higher-end and cheaper systems,” the report said.
Photo: Screen grab from AeroVironment’s Facebook page
That mix should include “‘good enough’ long-range drones for target acquisition and strike,” as well as “a smaller number of stealthy drones that can conduct surveillance in highly contested airspace,” along with “more sophisticated drones ... as a part of the collaborative combat aircraft program,” it said.
However, as the US alone could not compete with China in drone production, Taiwan would also need to invest heavily in building its own drone fleet, the report said.
“Chinese forces are better positioned to leverage drones than the United States or Taiwan. China already has a large and diverse fleet of relatively inexpensive drones that it could employ to find and attack US and Taiwanese forces,” it said.
The US would need to acquire more long-range drones, Taiwan would need to build up its fleet of short and medium-range drones, and both would need to develop “more sophisticated and autonomous drones for the future,” it said.
If a conflict broke out today in the Taiwan Strait, China would have an advantage due to its larger drone fleet and ability to manufacture military drones at a lower cost, the report said.
The US Department of Defense should “explore efforts to repurpose existing technologies, such as the Vampire system created for Ukraine, and find gun or cannon-based systems that can be fielded quickly and are much cheaper than missile interceptors,” it said.
The US military would also face a geographical disadvantage, as it would need to operate drones from bases farther away from the conflict than China would, it said.
“I don’t know if this is a fair fight,” Center for a New American Security senior fellow and defense program director Stacie Pettyjohn said.
In the Taiwan Strait scenario, many factors would work against the US, but its forces could do a lot to level the playing field to some extent, Pettyjohn said.
For example, the US could prioritize the development of “good enough” long-range drones that are cheap and can be purchased and replaced in large quantities, she said.
Such an approach would be diametrically opposed to the US Department of Defense’s current approach, which uses long and medium-range precision drones such as the RQ-4 Global Hawk and the MQ-9 Reaper, she said.
Those types of drones are in high demand and provide valuable tracking and strike capabilities, but over time are likely to be shot down, she said.
As an example of cheaper, but effective, drones that could be used for Taiwan’s defense, the US and Taiwan could employ loitering munitions, also known as exploding or suicide drones, which could attack Chinese ships in the Strait, the report said.
Taiwan could also use multilayered defense systems capable of disabling Chinese drones, it said.
The report recommended that the US establish a rigorous training program for drone pilots and develop operational concepts and tactics for the use of drones throughout the Indo-Pacific region.
Meanwhile, Taiwan could cultivate its commercial drone industry, invest in suicide drones and study how to integrate drones with ground firepower, it said.
Taiwan could also focus on maritime drones and inexpensive first-person view drone systems, which are commonly used by amateurs to film videos, but could also be used as single-use attack drones, it said.
“Ultimately, the United States must recognize that while drones alone would not win a war against China to defend Taiwan, they have become a key part of the competition and the United States cannot afford to remain behind,” the report said.
“Drones provide affordable airpower, but they have not replaced traditional air forces or been used to obtain air superiority,” it said.
CIVILIAN SIGHTING: Fishers from Penghu County took a photograph of a Chinese guided-missile destroyer near the median line of the Taiwan Strait China sent 77 military aircraft around Taiwan over a two-day period ending yesterday morning, an uptick in its activity over the past few weeks. Forty-one Chinese military aircraft were detected in the vicinity of Taiwan in the 24-hour period that ended at 6am yesterday, with 23 crossing the median line of the Taiwan Strait and nine crossing its extension, entering the country’s northern, southwestern and eastern air defense identification zones (ADIZs), flight routes released yesterday by the Ministry of National Defense showed. Of the nine aircraft that crossed the median line’s extension, were seven fighter jets and two drones that flew around
ESCALATING TENSIONS: The US called for restraint and meaningful dialogue after Beijing threatened Taiwanese independence advocates with the death sentence The US on Monday condemned China’s “escalatory and destabilizing language and actions” toward Taiwan after Beijing last week announced new guidelines to punish supporters of Taiwanese independence. Asked about the guidelines, which included the death sentence for “diehard” independence advocates, US Department of State spokesman Matthew Miller said: “We strongly condemn the escalatory and destabilizing language and actions from PRC [People’s Republic of China] officials.” “We continue to urge restraint and no unilateral change to the status quo,” he said at the press briefing. The US urges China to “engage in meaningful dialogue with Taiwan,” Miller said, adding that “threats and legal
UNDER THE RADAR: Two US deputy assistant state secretaries visited Taiwan and met with foreign diplomats to discuss how to boost the nation’s international participation US officials who visited Taiwan earlier this week met with foreign representatives and told them that UN Resolution 2758 does not involve Taiwan nor should it be conflated with China’s “one China” principle, sources said yesterday. UN Resolution 2758 recognized the People’s Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China in 1971. Beijing has been misrepresenting it to exclude Taiwan from the international organization and its affiliates. A representative to Taiwan, requesting anonymity, quoted the US officials as saying during a meeting that as long as it is not specified in UN Resolution 2758, “everything is feasible” with regard to
‘SEPARATIST’ CRACKDOWN: Beijing’s actions would only sow discord on both sides of the Taiwan Strait and damage exchanges, the Mainland Affairs Council said China has no jurisdiction over Taiwan, and its so-called laws and norms have no binding force on Taiwanese, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday as it called on Taiwanese “not to be threatened and intimidated” by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The council issued the remarks after China earlier in the day threatened to impose the death penalty in extreme cases of what it called “diehard Taiwanese independence separatists.” China’s state-run Xinhua news agency yesterday said the Chinese government unveiled guidelines that say its courts, prosecutors, public and state security bodies should “severely punish Taiwanese independence diehards for splitting the country