Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) yesterday reiterated his promise to return a set of controversial reform bills to the Legislative Yuan for reconsideration, saying that the Cabinet is constitutionally obligated to do so if the new laws would be hard to enact.
Under Article 3 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution, the Cabinet can return a bill to the legislature for reconsideration within 10 days of its submission if it deems it difficult to execute.
If more than half of the total number of lawmakers uphold the original bill, the Cabinet must accept it. If they cannot reach a resolution within 15 days after the session begins, the bill becomes invalid.
Photo: CNA
Under the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法), the legislature can also invite the premier to attend the review to explain the Cabinet’s reasoning.
Speaking to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus yesterday, Cho reiterated plans to return the bills that were approved by the legislature on Tuesday.
Once the Cabinet receives the bills and determines that they are difficult to execute, it is its responsibility to return them to the legislature as mandated in the Constitution, he said.
He also voiced support for the caucus’ plan to file for a constitutional interpretation.
Writing on Facebook late on Tuesday, Cho decried the amendments, saying they infringe on constitutionally defined rights, separation of powers and the principle of legal certainty.
“The precious thing about democracy is that consensus is built through discussion and communication,” he wrote.
By sending the set of bills back, the Cabinet does not intend to exacerbate conflict, but to give the legislature another chance to scrutinize and perfect the bills, and to respond to public concerns, he said.
If the Cabinet formally returns the bills for reconsideration, it would be the 14th time in the nation’s history it has done so.
Since 2000, the Cabinet has sent six bills back to the legislature. Four were during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) tenure, and three of them failed to pass.
Of the two returned during former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) tenure, both passed, while no bills were returned under former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
President William Lai (賴清德), speaking in his capacity as DPP chairman, said that the party respects and supports decisions by the Cabinet to return the bills and the party caucus to file for a constitutional interpretation.
Meanwhile, DPP spokesman Justin Wu (吳崢) said that Lai had previously said he would be willing to give a state of the nation address at the legislature — as required in one of the reform bills — if it was conducted in a legal and constitutional manner.
Additional reporting by Chen Yun and CNA
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or