The US is redoubling its support for the self-defense capabilities of Taiwan and other partners to counter the threat to regional stability posed by China’s rise, US Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Bonnie Jenkins said on Thursday at a hearing of the US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs.
The US Department of State and the US Department of Defense routinely exercise leadership and engage in discussions with allies and partners to improve diplomatic, informational, military and economic apparatus used to stabilize the Indo-Pacific region, Jenkins said.
Washington additionally conducts long-term defense and security aid programs to support the conventional military powers of allies in the region, she said.
Photo: screen grab from the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs’ Web site
“Be it the Republic of [South] Korea, Japan, Taiwan or the Philippines, we continue to ensure stability in the region by investing in our allies’ and partners’ capabilities to defend themselves,” Jenkins said.
The US Congress last month passed a US$95 billion aid package for Taiwan, Ukraine and Israel, which US President Joe Biden signed into law.
The package included a US$8.1 billion fund to supplement Indo-Pacific security, a US$2 billion foreign military financing fund, a US$1.9 billion fund for backfilling weapon systems diverted to Ukraine from other allies and a US$542 million budget for the use of the US Indo-Pacific Command.
In other developments, US senators across party lines on Thursday proposed a resolution to reject China’s mischaracterization of UN Resolution 2758, saying Beijing’s claim of sovereignty over Taiwan based on the resolution is not accepted by the world.
US Senator Jim Risch, a ranking Republican member of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and US Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat, proposed the resolution, reaffirming that the “one China policy” of the US is not equivalent to the “one China principle” of the Chinese Communist Party.
“The passage of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 in 1971 does not mean the world accepts China’s claimed sovereignty over Taiwan. Moreover, the United States’ ‘one China policy’ is not the same as China’s ‘one China principle,’” Risch said in a statement.
“Chinese leaders know this, but spread this propaganda to deny Taiwan’s ability to engage with international organizations. This resolution sets the record straight. The United States can and should push back on China’s false narratives at every opportunity,” the statement said.
Resolution 2758 was adopted by the 26th UN General Assembly in 1971 to solve the issue of China’s representation at the UN. It ultimately led to the Republic of China withdrawing from the UN and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) taking its place.
The resolution passed on Oct. 25, 1971, recognizes the PRC as the “only lawful representative of China.”
However, Taiwan and US governments have repeatedly argued that the resolution does not mention Taiwan, does not state that Taiwan is part of the PRC and does not explicitly authorize Beijing to represent Taiwan at the UN.
According to the seven-page resolution introduced by the two US senators, China has weaponized UN Resolution 2758 and the “one China principle” to isolate Taiwan and prevent the nation’s meaningful participation at the UN, UN-affiliated agencies and other international organizations.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
INVESTMENT WATCH: The US activity would not affect the firm’s investment in Taiwan, where 11 production lines would likely be completed this year, C.C. Wei said Investments by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) in the US should not be a cause for concern, but rather seen as the moment that the company and Taiwan stepped into the global spotlight, President William Lai (賴清德) told a news conference at the Presidential Office in Taipei yesterday alongside TSMC chairman and chief executive officer C.C. Wei (魏哲家). Wei and US President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday announced plans to invest US$100 billion in the US to build three advanced foundries, two packaging plants, and a research and development center, after Trump threatened to slap tariffs on chips made
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS