The Constitutional Court in April is to hear oral arguments on whether the death penalty is constitutional, and a ruling is to be made in three months, with an extension of two months allowed if needed, it said on Thursday.
Thirty-seven death-row prisoners have filed a petition for a ruling on whether the death penalty is unconstitutional based on the principles of the right to life, human dignity and proportionality.
The Constitutional Court said that it would review a petition filed in 2022 by Wang Xin-fu (王信福), the oldest man on death row in Taiwan, along with related cases filed by death-row prisoners, in an oral argument session to be held from 10am to 4pm on April 23.
Photo: Taipei Times file
The arguments could center on two questions.
The first is whether the death penalty, a legally prescribed punishment, is constitutional.
The court said it wants to clarify whether, in addition to the right to life, the death penalty infringes upon other rights protected by the Constitution, such as the right not to be tortured or the right to human dignity; whether the pursued goals of the death penalty system are constitutional; and whether there are other means of punishment and supplementary measures available if the death penalty is deemed unconstitutional.
The second question is if the death penalty is determined to be constitutional, whether the court should limit the types of crimes that it can be applied to.
The court said it would also seek clarity on whether the crimes that the petitioners were sentenced to death for are still constitutional and why, and whether the scope of criminal death sentences should be limited, as Article 19 of the Criminal Code stipulates that an offense is not punishable if it is committed by a person who has a mental disorder or disability, and the punishment may be reduced as a result of their capacity for judgement.
Under the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法), the verdict should be pronounced within three months after an oral argument, and an extension of two months is allowed when necessary.
The cases originally included three other death-row prisoners, but they had died of illnesses in detention centers, so their cases would not be reviewed this time.
As Judicial Vice President Tsai Chiung-tun (蔡炯燉), Grand Justice Tsai Tsai-chen (蔡彩貞) and Grand Justice Greg Yo (尤伯祥) have participated in the trials of death-row prisoners, they would not participate in the hearing, the Constitutional Court said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS