Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator-at-large-elect Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) yesterday announced that he is teaming up with KMT Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) to run for legislative speaker and deputy speaker respectively, although Chiang said he would make way for a Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislator to become deputy speaker if the party is willing to work with the KMT.
The former Kaohsiung mayor announced his bid for speaker after the KMT emerged as the largest party in the legislature following the legislative elections on Saturday. No party holds a majority.
“We know that electing a president is not enough to create a democracy of the people, by the people and for the people. What we need is people-oriented legislation with a lasting legacy, and lawmakers who review bills and budget plans, and oversee the government’s policy execution,” he said.
Photo: Taipei Times
“I thank Johnny for agreeing to work with me for this fight. We hope to resume the Legislative Yuan’s functions to oversee the government, rather than serving merely as a legislative agency of the Democratic Progressive Party [DPP] government,” he said.
“However, we are also clear that we cannot fulfill our promises to about 8 million voters who voted for the KMT and the TPP without the two parties forming a united front,” Han said.
“As long as our friends in the TPP are willing to work with us, Legislator Chiang is willing to pass this chance to run for deputy speaker to a TPP legislator, which would facilitate the unity of opposition parties. This is the only way for the DPP to feel the rage of the 60 percent of the voters who did not vote for them,” he said.
TPP legislator-at-large-elect Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) on Facebook reiterated that all speaker candidates should first respond in definitive terms to the appeals for legislative reforms that the TPP presented on Monday.
“We will not negotiate or exchange benefits with any individual candidate in private,” she said.
Asked on Tuesday about being Han’s deputy, TPP legislator-at-large-elect Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) said that he has “absolutely no interest” in being deputy speaker.
TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) also said that a Han-Huang Kuo-chang ticket is “hard for him to imagine.”
Legislative Speaker You Si-kun (游錫?), who topped the DPP’s legislator-at-large list, is expected to run for the position again. The DPP has yet to announce who would serve as his deputy or whether it would work with the TPP.
“A DPP-TPP partnership is only possible if the TPP voluntarily comes to us,” DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said on a talk show on Tuesday, adding that Huang Kuo-chang’s demand that the KMT and the DPP respond to the TPP’s appeals was only for show.
According to the Method for Mutual Election of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker by Legislators (立法委員互選院長副院長辦法), one-third of the 113-member legislature must be present to form a quorum, and the speaker and deputy speaker must obtain more than half of the votes from the attendees.
If no one gets more than half of the votes in the first round, a second round of votes between the top two candidates would be held, with the person who obtains majority of the votes being elected.
The speaker and deputy speaker could also be re-elected, but more than one-third of all legislators must propose such a motion and more than two-thirds of the attendees must approve the re-election.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say