The Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee has reclaimed more than NT$100 billion (US$3.13 billion) of assets that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) obtained during the Martial Law era, committee Chairman Lin Feng-jeng (林?正) said yesterday.
The committee has nationalized about NT$53 billion and 136,000m2 of land from the KMT and its affiliates, Lin said in an interview published yesterday by the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) ahead of the seventh anniversary this month of the committee’s founding.
The restored properties generate NT$50 million in combined rent each year, he said.
Photo: Chen Yu-fu, Taipei Times
The KMT was ordered to transfer to the government its 100 percent stake in Central Investment Holdings (中央投資), which has an estimated value of NT$20 billion to NT$30 billion, he said.
The committee believes that Central Investment Holdings was founded using public funds, which justified the move to nullify the party’s ownership, Lin said.
Taiwan could learn from how Spain has dealt with local governments that refuse to dispose of icons of authoritarian figures, Lin said.
Spain ordered local governments to dispose of monuments to general Franciso Franco — who led the overthrow of the Second Spanish Republic and governed the nation from 1939 to 1975 — or face fines of up to 10,000 euros (US$10,867), Lin said.
Transitional justice in Spain has achieved measurable success in doing away with symbols of Franco, which had once been as prevalent there as busts and statues of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) in government offices, schools and parks in Taiwan, he said.
“Where we are still struggling, they have more or less completed the work,” he said.
However, Taiwan has moved faster than Spain to return unlawfully expropriated property and wealth to their rightful owners, he added.
Spanish society in general showed more willingness to support the government in dealing with its authoritarian past, while swathes of the Taiwanese public and some groups continue to resist democratization, he said.
Last week, the Taipei High Administrative Court ruled that the Chinese Association for Relief and Ensuing Services illegally gained assets as a KMT affiliate during the authoritarian period, he said.
The association used the support of the state’s propaganda apparatuses to launch donation drives and levy pseudo-taxes on movie tickets during the Martial Law era, Lin said.
It was created as an intermediary entity for diplomatic activities that the government and the KMT did not want to officially acknowledge, but the party-state tightly controlled every aspect of the group, he said.
The group was ordered to withdraw its decision to name democracy advocate Lei Chen (雷震) as a member of its board of supervisors, apparently because Chiang had a falling out with Lei, Lin said.
The committee has proof that the association’s activities were dictated by the KMT’s central standing committee of the time, he said.
The assets committee had no issue with the association using public funds to carry out official tasks, but it hoarded the resources long after the KMT party-state ended, Lin said.
Its assets were later used by a non-public actor for activities that had nothing to do with the public interest, he added.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say