Beijing is expected to continue using political and military threats, as well as people in Taiwan who support unification, to push Taiwan into becoming part of China, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said in a report published yesterday.
The report, which the council publishes periodically, analyzes five aspects of the situation in China: its internal affairs, foreign relations and military moves in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as changes in Hong Kong and Macau, and cross-strait relations.
Beijing has intensified its work to “accelerate unification” with Taiwan, the report said.
Photo: Taipei Times files
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Politburo Standing Committee member Wang Huning (王滬寧) and Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤) this month told visiting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leaders that Taiwan and China can increase exchanges and form partnerships on the basis of the so-called “1992 consensus” and opposition to independence, it said.
The “1992 consensus,” a term former MAC chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the CCP that both sides of the Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Song also called for cross-strait exchanges to restart as he met with representatives from religious groups in Taiwan, and agricultural and fishery industries to express his condolences after Buddhist master Hsing Yun (星雲), founder of the Kaohsiung-based Fo Guang Shan, died on Feb. 5, the report said.
In the past two years, Beijing unilaterally suspended imports of agricultural, fishery and food products from Taiwan, but revealed that some Taiwanese products have been allowed in after businesses completed registration, the report said.
Beijing has urged Taipei to resume cross-strait flights, as well as the “small three links” connecting China with Kinmen and Lienchiang counties, it said.
“Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) told US President Joe Biden in a G20 meeting in Indonesia in November last year that Taiwan is the core of China’s core interests and a red line that must not be crossed,” it said. “In response to US House of Representative Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s potential visit to Taiwan, the CCP also highlighted that it would prevent external forces from intervening in China’s internal affairs and frustrate the plan of pro-Taiwan independence activists.”
China claimed that combat drills in waters and airspace around Taiwan in August last year were launched in response to provocative actions by Taiwan, it said.
“It is expected that the CCP would intensify use of its two-pronged approach toward Taiwan: In addition to the persistent political and military threats, it would continue to use unification supporters and platforms to promote cross-strait exchanges and facilitate the work of unification,” the report said.
Meanwhile, the Chinese Ministry of National Defense reiterated that this year it would focus on preparing for war, and improving joint and all-domain combat capabilities, the report said.
The Liaoning aircraft carrier conducted drills near Guam for the first time in December last year, it said, adding that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army had monitored a US carrier.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say