Domestic firm United Biomedical Inc’s (聯亞生技) COVID-19 vaccine, UB-612, failed to obtain emergency use authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) said yesterday.
FDA Director-General Wu Shou-mei (吳秀梅) said a meeting was held on Sunday to review United Biomedical’s proposal to manufacture its COVID-19 vaccine.
The company’s clinical trials found that the vaccine met safety standards, but it did not generate enough neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 to meet the standards set by the FDA specialists’ panel, she said.
Photo: Lin Hui-chin, Taipei Times
Twenty-two specialists attended the meeting, and among the 21 who voted, four voted to hold further discussions after the company provided more information and 17 voted against granting emergency use authorization, Wu said.
United Biomedical is planning to conduct phase 3 clinical trials in India, the FDA said.
Chan Ming-hsiao (詹明曉), director of the Center for Drug Evaluation’s Division of New Drugs, said that the FDA and the CECC have over the past one-and-a-half years offered weekly supervision to domestic vaccine makers, assisting them in meeting the requirements for legal and technical data review.
Technical data review items include aspects of chemistry, manufacturing and control, to ensure the safety and stability of the vaccine, he said, adding that additional data on its pharmacology and toxicology were reviewed human clinical trials were conducted.
Chan said domestic companies were asked to enroll at least 3,000 participants in its clinical trials, and follow up on the safety information for at least a month after the participants received their last vaccine dose.
Using immunobridging to compare the efficacy of the new vaccines with the AstraZeneca vaccine, the FDA specialists’ panel set two standards that domestic vaccines must meet to obtain emergency use authorization, he said.
The levels of neutralizing antibodies produced in participants of the United Biomedical clinical trial failed to comply with the non-inferiority standard, Chan said.
As the government had procured 5 million doses of United Biomedical’s COVID-19 vaccine in advance, the CECC was asked if the firm’s failure to obtain emergency use authorization would further affect the nation’s vaccine shortage.
Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), who heads the CECC, said the government has procured more vaccine doses than needed, so if United Biomedical’s vaccine had obtained emergency use authorization, more people would have been vaccinated earlier, but there would still be enough doses to meet local demand even without it.
The FDA yesterday announced that one batch of the Moderna vaccine, or 99,000 doses, and four batches of the Medigen vaccine, or 261,766 doses, have passed lot release testing.
Including the 261,766 doses, there are now a total of 614,204 Medigen doses available to be administered, Chen said.
Chen said the 605,359 people who had registered to receive the Medigen vaccine between Monday next week and Sunday next week could start booking their vaccination appointments from 10am yesterday.
As of 5pm, about 49.95 percent had already booked an appointment, he said.
Separately, Presidential Office spokesman Xavier Chang (張惇涵) said that President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) had yesterday booked an appointment to receive the Medigen vaccine on Monday next week.
Vice President William Lai (賴清德) had planned to be inoculated with the United Biomedical vaccine, but he would now register for the Medigen vaccine, Chang added.
Additional reporting by CNA
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS