The Institute for National Defense and Security Research is expanding its ties with think tanks in Europe, and they are interested in Taiwan’s experience in countering China’s security threats, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday.
Since its establishment in May 2018 by the Ministry of National Defense, the institute has interacted with think tanks or research agencies in the US, New Zealand, Australia, India, Japan, South Korea and Europe, its budget plans over the past few years showed.
Many European nations have been alerted to China’s “wolf warrior” diplomacy, military expansionism and its ties with Russia, which is an opportunity for the institute to acquire more partners through “think tank diplomacy,” an institute member said on condition of anonymity.
Photo: Aaron Tu, Taipei Times
The institute has twice led delegations to participate in the annual Berlin Security Conference, the member said.
The conference is “a window of opportunity” for the institute to expand its military interactions with European nations, it wrote in its budget plan for 2019, adding that it was attended by high-ranking military officers from Germany and Italy, but none from China.
However, as formal military interactions between Taiwan and Europe are impossible at this time, the institute’s priorities are to build up communication channels and mutual trust with its European counterparts, the member said.
Several European nations have expressed an interest in learning from Taiwan’s experience in countering disinformation campaigns and cognitive warfare by Beijing, the member added.
The institute had planned to visit the Finland-based European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats — established in 2017 by members from the US, the UK and Germany among others — as well as other research agencies in Estonia, Sweden and Denmark, its budget plan for last fiscal year showed.
While those plans were shelved due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there are many potential partners for the institute in the Baltic and northern Europe, as their situation is similar to that of Taiwan, having to confront threats posed by Russia, the member said.
When it comes to countering Beijing’s verbal and military intimidation, Taiwan is the most experienced nation, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chao Tien-lin (趙天麟) said, adding that the institute could share Taiwan’s experience with its European partners.
The institute is Taiwan’s only official think tank, so it should continue to reach out to partners in the UK, France, Germany and Spain at a time when the EU and NATO are expanding their participation in the Indo-Pacific region, DPP Legislator Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) said.
Interactions with think tanks in Japan, Australia and India should continue, as these nations are also playing increasingly significant roles in the region, he said.
European nations had been less involved in the Indo-Pacific region, but that has changed, National Taiwan University Department of Political Science associate professor Chen Shih-min (陳世民) said.
“With China promoting ‘wolf warrior’ diplomacy and becoming more aggressive toward Taiwan and in the Indo-Pacific region, cross-strait issues have become a flash point of international security affairs,” Chen said. “European nations that maintain close ties with Washington cannot be indifferent to the situation.”
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say