China is not likely to change its policy toward Taiwan after the US presidential election, but it is likely to broaden its tactics to pressure Taiwanese businesses and the public into accepting its “one China” political framework, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chen Ming-tong (陳明通) said in Taipei yesterday.
Chen made the remarks while presenting a report on “The impact of US presidential results on cross-strait relations” at a meeting of the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee.
While several lawmakers expressed concerns about a Taiwan policy shift under the administration of US president-elect Joe Biden, with some describing Biden as being “China-friendly” and others pointing to Biden’s opposition to a bill to strengthen Taiwan’s security in 1999, Chen told lawmakers that a fundamental change in US support for Taiwan was unlikely.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de , Taipei Times
“Although there might be some changes in Biden’s tactics toward China, there will be no change in the China strategy,” he said.
Taiwan and the US share the same values, he added.
While he does not foresee a change in China’s policy toward Taiwan irrespective of the outcome of the US elections, Beijing could escalate its military intimidation to force Taiwan to accept its unification political agenda, he said.
“It is likely that China will broaden its tactics and step up its propaganda campaign to pressure Taiwan’s businesses and different sectors in society to accept its ‘one China’ political framework and heighten Chinese military actions to pressure us into ‘peace talks’ as part of its ‘united front’ strategy,” Chen said.
“China has made an effort to block US involvement in the region, to undermine Taiwan-US cooperation,” he added. “Some adjustments could come in US-China relations after the election outcome, but Beijing has its fixed agenda for dealing with Taiwan, therefore we must still tread carefully in the coming years.”
He cited Beijing’s release last month of its latest Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development, in which it stresses its “one China principle for unification” and deterring Taiwan from declaring independence in its policy section on Taiwan.
“China insists on the option of a military invasion of Taiwan, and [using] provocation and encroachment tactics to undermine cross-strait stability,” Chen said.
Separately, National Security Bureau Director-General Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) was also asked at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee if US policy on Taiwan would be different after a change in administration.
“No matter which political party takes charge of the US government, overall it will keep its policy to contain China, while being friendly with Taiwan,” Chiu said.
“However, Taiwan must rely on itself... We cannot depend on other countries,” he added.
“When a country has a transfer of power, some policies will continue, and some policies will be adjusted. We have no influence over the course and timetable of their government changeover process,” Chiu said.
The one thing that the bureau can take charge of is to keep on monitoring any moves by China, as “the post-US election period is the most treacherous time for cross-strait relations,” he said.
Additional reporting by Jason Pan and Reuters
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS