It is an indisputable fact that Taiwan is a nation and its name is the Republic of China (ROC), Premier William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday, in response to Beijing’s insistence that Taiwan and China belongs to “one China.”
“Cross-strait relations are not state-to-state relations. There is no one China and one Taiwan. Taiwan is an indivisible part of Chinese territories. It has never been and will never be a country. China steadfastly opposes any form of Taiwanese independence,” China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman Ma Xiaoguang (馬曉光) said earlier yesterday.
“A nation is composed of its people, territory and sovereignty,” Lai told a news conference after presiding over an Executive Yuan meeting on attracting investments to Taiwan. “We elect our own president and officials; the people pay taxes to the government. By any metric, Taiwan is a sovereign and independent nation.”
Photo: Lee Hsin-fang, Taipei Times
It was a reiteration of his comment during a legislative question-and-answer session on Tuesday, when he said: “We are a sovereign and independent country and its name is the Republic of China.”
Lai’s beliefs are in line with those of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), Executive Yuan spokesman Hsu Kuo-yung (徐國勇) said.
“We are an independent and sovereign state whose name is the ROC. This is the president’s position, whom, I should add, was elected president of the ROC,” Hsu said.
Asked whether Lai’s position is new, Hsu responded in the negative, saying that former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) had said the same thing in the past.
“Was it not the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) official position that the ROC is a sovereign and independent nation? If any KMT member thinks we are not a sovereign and independent nation, now is the time to speak up,” Hsu said.
“The spirit of the premier’s comments are consistent with the government’s position on cross-strait policy,” Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Katharine Chang (張小月) said.
The government has consistently followed the ROC Constitution, the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (兩岸人民關係條例) and relevant laws, she said.
“The administration seeks peace, stability and good communications in cross-strait relations, but we insist that exchanges should be conducted under the premise of equality and dignity,” Chang said.
The international community recognizes Taiwan for its freedom, democracy, human rights and rule of law, she added.
“The future of Taiwan and cross-strait developments must be determined by Taiwan’s 23 million people. This is the national consensus and a fact that China would do well to understand,” the MAC said.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) also issued a statement repeating Lai’s comments that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent nation whose name is the ROC.
A majority of Taiwanese believe that any changes to the “status quo” must be democratically approved by the public, the DPP said.
“Because the TAO’s cross-strait policy position runs counter to what the majority of Taiwanese believe about their own national identity, no support for it will be forthcoming from Taiwanese society,” the DPP said.
The Chinese government should recognize the ROC’s existence as a fact and commit itself to resolving differences with dialogue, rather than obstructing the normal development of ties across the Strait for political reasons, the DPP said.
Additional reporting by Hung Mei-hsiu
CELEBRATION: The PRC turned 75 on Oct. 1, but the Republic of China is older. The PRC could never be the homeland of the people of the ROC, Lai said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) could not be the “motherland” of the people of the Republic of China (ROC), President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks in a speech at a Double Ten National Day gala in Taipei, which is part of National Day celebrations that are to culminate in a fireworks display in Yunlin County on Thursday night next week. Lai wished the country a happy birthday and called on attendees to enjoy the performances and activities while keeping in mind that the ROC is a sovereign and independent nation. He appealed for everyone to always love their
‘EXTREME PRESSURE’: Beijing’s goal is to ‘force Taiwan to make mistakes,’ Admiral Tang Hua said, adding that mishaps could serve as ‘excuses’ for launching a blockade China’s authoritarian expansionism threatens not only Taiwan, but the rules-based international order, the navy said yesterday, after its top commander said in an interview that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could blockade the nation at will. The object of Beijing’s expansionist activities is not limited to Taiwan and its use of pressure is not confined to specific political groups or people, the navy said in a statement. China utilizes a mixture of cognitive warfare and “gray zone” military activities to pressure Taiwan, the navy said, adding that PLA sea and air forces are compressing the nation’s defensive depth. The navy continues to
MAKING PROGRESS: Officials and industry leaders who participated in a defense forum last month agreed that Taiwan has the capabilities to work with the US, the report said Taiwan’s high-tech defense industry is to enhance collaboration with the US to produce weapons needed for self-defense, the Ministry of National Defense said in a report to the Legislative Yuan. Deputy Minister of National Defense Hsu Yen-pu (徐衍璞) discussed building regional and global industry alliances with US partners at the US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference in Philadelphia held from Sept. 22 to Tuesday last week, the ministry said in the declassified portion of the report. The visit contributed to maintaining bilateral ties, facilitated Taiwan’s efforts to acquire weapons and equipment, and strengthened the resilience of the two nation’s defense industries, it said. Taiwan-US ties
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering