Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Steve Chan (詹啟賢) yesterday denied that “one China, with different interpretations [of what ‘China’ means]” has been scrapped in the party’s policy platform, contrary to what some KMT lawmakers have said.
Chan made the remarks in response to reporters’ questions about a dispute at Friday’s KMT caucus meeting, at which some KMT lawmakers voiced discontent over the party’s new policy platform, which was said to omit “one China, with different interpretations,” keeping only the so-called “1992 consensus.”
The “1992 consensus” — a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted making up in 2000 — refers to a supposed understanding between the KMT and the Chinese government that both sides acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Photo: CNA
Chan said on the sidelines of a vote for the head of the party’s Youth League that the text “1992 consensus” and “one China, with different interpretations” are clearly stated in the preamble of the new policy platform put forward on Sept. 4, adding that it does not mean the latter part has been deleted just because it is not in the rest of the document.
When asked about strife within the party over the issue, Chan said: “What strife is there if the deletion in dispute is nonexistent?”
The “1992 consensus” and “one China, with different interpretations” referred to by Chan appear in a paragraph that delineates the party’s past endeavors to improve cross-strait ties, which “started in 2005 with former KMT chairman Lien Chan’s (連戰) trip of peace [to China] that broke the cross-strait standoff and former President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) maintaining the status quo according to the Republic of China [ROC] constitutional framework and reinstating cross-strait negotiations and exchanges with ‘1992 consensus’ and ‘one China, with different interpretations’ as the foundation,” according to the platform.
In the chapter titled “Policy platforms for different fields” in a section about promoting cross-strait exchanges, the platform says the “1992 consensus should be deepened on the basis of the ROC Constitution and the possibility of ending cross-strait hostility with a peace agreement should be proactively pursued.”
KMT Legislator Huang Chao-shun (黃昭順) on Friday expressed doubts about the party headquarters’ changes to the policy.
She said that the “1992 consensus” and “one China, different interpretations” are among the KMT’s “stronger arguments regarding [Beijing] in past years, so I insist that they must be there” in full.
“Sunny Snail,” the name of a group of KMT Chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu’s (洪秀柱) young supporters, posted news reports and comments on Facebook later on Friday, accusing the KMT caucus of revealing discussions that should have been behind closed doors.
The group criticized remarks reportedly made by Huang saying the policy change would pave the way for others to “smear the party.”
Huang said if there is a problem, the group should contact her.
Additional Reporting by CNA
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS