Taiwanese tourists visiting New York are being denied entry to the UN headquarters, a Washington conference was told on Wednesday.
The conference heard it was a new development and most likely the result of “interference” from China.
“I have learned that people from Taiwan who were in New York and visiting the UN building — they simply wanted to take a tour — were turned away, because they were showing their ROC [Republic of China] passports,” China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies director Bonnie Glaser said.
Photo: AFP
She told the Heritage Foundation conference on “Taiwan in International Organizations” that the tourists were probably students.
“It makes you understand why, particularly youth in Taiwan, are increasingly hostile toward China,” Glaser said. “The Chinese have obviously gone through their own channels to put pressure on the UN.”
While it was not possible to determine exactly when the UN decided to turn away Taiwanese visitors, attendees at the conference said they believe it happened after the election of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in January.
“This is relatively new. I hear it started earlier this year, probably around the time of the election in Taiwan — I don’t think this is something that has happened in the past,” Glaser said.
“We need to have quiet conversations to get a better fix on what happened, why it happened and see if it can be reversed,” former managing director of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Barbara Schrage said.
Michael Mazza, a research fellow in foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, described the incident as an example of “absurd behavior.”
“We are currently unable to verify the specific incident regarding the Taiwanese students,” UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s spokesperson Devi Palanivelu told the Taipei Times.
She referred the Taipei Times to the UN Web site where it states under the heading “New UN Access” that all visitors to the global body 18 years and older now require a government-issued photo identification issued by a member or an observer state to enter UN headquarters.
The Taipei Times was not able to determine exactly when the regulation went into force.
Glaser told the Heritage conference that Taiwan was excluded from many international organizations due to interference from Beijing.
“Every Chinese diplomat is tasked to impede, block and hamper Taiwan’s international space whenever there is an opportunity. Even when Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was president, that instruction to Chinese foreign ministry officials did not change,” she said. “China’s neuralgia about the danger of Taiwan’s independence has resulted in a campaign to snuff out Taiwan’s voice everywhere and anywhere that it appears.”
Glaser said that by taking these actions, China was harming relations with Taiwan and its people, even as it claimed to want to win over their hearts and minds.
She said that a good way to approach the problem of Taiwanese visitors being refused entry into the UN might be to hold “quiet discussions” with members of the UN and with Ban.
“I do think we have to push back and not simply look the other way and maybe this is something that if it is not done too publicly we could influence how the UN is operating on this,” Glaser said.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS