More than 71 percent of Taiwanese do not agree that participating in the World Health Assembly (WHA) entails accepting the so-called “one China” principle upheld by Beijing, while more than 80 percent said it falls within the new government’s remit to decide how to reply to the WHA’s invitation, a survey yesterday showed.
The poll, conducted by the Cross-Strait Policy Association on Tuesday and Wednesday, found that 69.5 percent of respondents are aware that the WHO mentioned the “one China” principle in its invitation to Taiwan; 30.3 percent had no idea.
When asked whether they would agree that Taiwan has to accept the “one China” principle to participate in the WHA, 57.4 percent of respondents said no, while 22.3 percent said yes, with 20.3 percent choosing not to answer either way.
The survey showed that 45.9 percent of respondents said it would be inappropriate for President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration to reply to the WHA invitation given that it mentions the “one China” principle and the so-called “1992 consensus,” while 39.1 said it was appropriate and 14.9 percent did not respond to the question.
It showed that 55.5 percent said it would be appropriate for the incoming government to reply to the invitation with a statement underlining that it was unnecessary to mention the “one China” principle, whereas 26.3 percent disagreed.
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Asked which government they think should decide on the content and stance of a reply to the WHA invitation, 82.2 percent said it should be the new government, while 9.6 percent said it should be the Ma administration.
Of pan-blue supporters, 76.5 percent said it is the new government’s responsibility, while 18.5 said it is the Ma administration’s.
In response to the question: “Do you agree with the claim that if Taiwan participates in the WHA this time, it means accepting the ‘one China’ principle,” 71.1 percent of respondents said no, while 17 percent said yes. In both the pan-green and pan-blue camps, more than 50 percent disagreed with the claim; 86.3 percent of green camp respondents and 54.7 percent of blue camp.
When given three options concerning how to reply to the invitation — participating, participating with protest over the “one China” principle or turning down the invitation, 57.6 percent said the best approach would be to participate and protest, 26 percent chose simple participation and 8.5 percent said the government should not participate at all.
The survey was based on 1,076 effective samples and had a margin of error of 2.99 percentage points.
Former Democratic Progressive Party legislator Lin Cho-shui (林濁水) said that with more than 70 percent denying that participation is tantamount to accepting China’s “one China” principle shows that Beijing’s browbeating tactics have only further consolidated the Taiwanese consensus.
“China’s ‘one China’ principle has caused trouble for the KMT, while it had intended the principle to be a boost. It has sowed a rift in the pan-blue camp and made the KMT stand in opposition to the majority of the people,” Lin said.
Association secretary-general Wang Zhin-sheng (王智盛) said the KMT might become the most unstable element in future cross-strait exchanges while it keeps echoing whatever China says.
“Taiwan’s international participation is what Taiwanese care about, but people also are well aware that it is always Beijing’s pressure that is thwarting Taiwan’s meaningful involvement in international affairs. It is a warning to the KMT that has recently been going ‘deep-blue’ [radicalized],” he said.
Association director Wu Chun-cheng (吳春城) said he is not pessimistic about the future of cross-strait interactions.
“President-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) are tangoeing; they are learning how to advance and retreat when needed,” Wu said.
“We are participating, but would not accept that your principle’ is an alternative to ‘respective interpretations,’” Wu said, adding this is in line with the public opinion and is a practical move by the incoming Democratic Progressive Party government that should be applauded.
CLASH OF WORDS: While China’s foreign minister insisted the US play a constructive role with China, Rubio stressed Washington’s commitment to its allies in the region The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday affirmed and welcomed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio statements expressing the US’ “serious concern over China’s coercive actions against Taiwan” and aggressive behavior in the South China Sea, in a telephone call with his Chinese counterpart. The ministry in a news release yesterday also said that the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs had stated many fallacies about Taiwan in the call. “We solemnly emphasize again that our country and the People’s Republic of China are not subordinate to each other, and it has been an objective fact for a long time, as well as
‘CHARM OFFENSIVE’: Beijing has been sending senior Chinese officials to Okinawa as part of efforts to influence public opinion against the US, the ‘Telegraph’ reported Beijing is believed to be sowing divisions in Japan’s Okinawa Prefecture to better facilitate an invasion of Taiwan, British newspaper the Telegraph reported on Saturday. Less than 750km from Taiwan, Okinawa hosts nearly 30,000 US troops who would likely “play a pivotal role should Beijing order the invasion of Taiwan,” it wrote. To prevent US intervention in an invasion, China is carrying out a “silent invasion” of Okinawa by stoking the flames of discontent among locals toward the US presence in the prefecture, it said. Beijing is also allegedly funding separatists in the region, including Chosuke Yara, the head of the Ryukyu Independence
‘VERY SHALLOW’: The center of Saturday’s quake in Tainan’s Dongshan District hit at a depth of 7.7km, while yesterday’s in Nansai was at a depth of 8.1km, the CWA said Two magnitude 5.7 earthquakes that struck on Saturday night and yesterday morning were aftershocks triggered by a magnitude 6.4 quake on Tuesday last week, a seismologist said, adding that the epicenters of the aftershocks are moving westward. Saturday and yesterday’s earthquakes occurred as people were preparing for the Lunar New Year holiday this week. As of 10am yesterday, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) recorded 110 aftershocks from last week’s main earthquake, including six magnitude 5 to 6 quakes and 32 magnitude 4 to 5 tremors. Seventy-one of the earthquakes were smaller than magnitude 4. Thirty-one of the aftershocks were felt nationwide, while 79
MARITIME SECURITY: Of the 52 vessels, 15 were rated a ‘threat’ for various reasons, including the amount of time they spent loitering near subsea cables, the CGA said Taiwan has identified 52 “suspicious” Chinese-owned ships flying flags of convenience that require close monitoring if detected near the nation, the Coast Guard Administration (CGA) said yesterday, as the nation seeks to protect its subsea telecoms cables. The stricter regime comes after a Cameroon-flagged vessel was briefly detained by the CGA earlier this month on suspicion of damaging an international cable northeast of Taiwan. The vessel is owned by a Hong Kong-registered company with a Chinese address given for its only listed director, the CGA said previously. Taiwan fears China could sever its communication links as part of an attempt
RSS