Sun, Nov 17, 2013 page1

• Albanian ‘no’ blow to Syrian chemical weapons agreement

  ‘IMPOSSIBLE’: Albania said it could not host the destruction of the weapons after days of protests, while the US said several nations were mulling stepping in

  • Reuters, THE HAGUE and TIRANA
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Albania on Friday rejected a US request to host the destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons, dealing a blow to a US-Russian accord to eliminate such arms from the country’s protracted civil war.

  Negotiations went down to the wire as the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in The Hague hit the deadline on Friday for a step-by-step plan to get rid of 1,300 tonnes of Syria’s sarin, mustard gas and other agents.

  After the Albanian decision, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning body adopted a plan on Friday night that set out deadlines in the destruction process, but did not name a host country for the effort or provide details on security arrangements.

  

  Environmental activists celebrates in Tirana, Albania’s main square on Friday after the announcement by Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama that he turned down a request by the US to be part of an operation to destroy Syria’s chemical weapons stockpile, under the supervision of international experts.

  Photo: AFP

  Albania’s refusal marked an unprecedented break from its traditionally staunch allegiance to NATO ally Washington and may make it hard to meet destruction deadlines. It followed a storm of protest in the Adriatic republic, where protesters complained of exploitation.

  “It is impossible for Albania to get involved in this operation,” Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama, just two months in the job, said in a televised address to the nation.

  “We lack the necessary capacities to get involved in this operation,” he said, following days of growing protests outside government buildings.

  Hundreds of demonstrators, including students skipping school classes, gathered earlier on Friday to denounce the plan for Albania to host the destruction of the Syrian weapons, “NO” painted on their faces.

  In Washington, US Department of State spokeswoman Jen Psaki sought to downplay the Albanian decision, saying several other nations “are seriously considering ... hosting the destruction efforts.”

  She did not identify these, but said the US expects that the timelines for the destruction of the Syrian weapons would be met despite the Albanian refusal.

  There was no immediate indication where the US or Russia might look next to dispose of thousands of tonnes of toxic waste. One source briefed on the discussions said Washington had bet on Albanian cooperation.

  Faced with the threat of US missile strikes, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in September agreed to destroy his entire chemical weapons stockpile following a sarin gas attack that killed hundreds of people in Damascus on Aug. 21.

  Washington said only al-Assad’s forces could have carried out the attack, a charge the Syrian leader denied.

  The plan adopted by the OPCW on Friday called for the “most critical” chemicals to be transported out of Syria by Dec. 31, with the removal of all declared chemical substances and precursors, except for isopropanol, one of two key ingredients for sarin, no later than Feb. 5.

  Under the plan, Syria’s chemical weapons facilities would be gradually destroyed between Dec. 15 and March 15, while the destruction of the priority chemical weapons would be completed outside Syria by March 31. All other declared chemical materials would be eliminated by June 30.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    China to ban sales to US

  • 2

    Earthquakes exceeding magnitude 5.5 on the Richter scale hit 14-year high

  • 3

    Taiwan places military on high alert

  • 4

    China warships near Taiwan nearly doubles

  • 5

    Flights arranged for Taiwanese stranded in Okinawa