President Chen Shui-bian (
"To this end, Taiwan needs to adapt itself quickly to every changing circumstance and become braver despite frustration," Chen told a group of Taiwanese reporters on his airplane shortly before talking off from the Schipol airport in Amsterdam for Asuncion, Paraguay.
The president said that these reasons lay behind his decision not to stop over in Anchorage, Alaska, en route to Paraguay during his Latin American trip.
PHOTO: CNA
Chen's plane made a brief stop in the capital of the Netherlands for refueling.
"We must find our way resolutely and fearlessly with no regard for the great pressure we are facing," Chen said.
Several hours before that, the president had made a transit stop in Abu Dhabi, capital of the United Arab Emirates, where he engaged in wide-ranging talks with senior politicians.
Minister of Foreign Affairs James Huang (黃志芳), who is accompanying Chen, said that the president had originally planned to stop over in Beirut and then fly to the Dominican Republic for refueling before continuing to Asuncion.
But the plan to stop in Beirut was blocked owing to China's opposition, forcing the president to change his plan and stop in Abu Dhabi, Huang said.
As the high temperature in Abu Dhabi meant that the president's plane could not be completely refueled for safety reasons related to the increased volatility of the fuel, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs applied for permission from Dutch officials for a refueling stop in Amsterdam, Huang said.
He said that the plane would fly directly from Amsterdam to Asuncion without stopping in the Dominican Republic.
Ministry spokesman Michel Lu (
Chen departed Taipei on Thursday for a two-nation Latin American visit. Taipei had previously requested that he be allowed to stop over in San Francisco and New York during the trip. The request was turned down by the US government, which offered to allow Chen to stop in Honolulu, Hawaii, or Anchorage for transit.
The diplomatic twist in which Chen abandoned Anchorage and opted for other locations for transits yesterday had sparked concerns over the future of Taiwan-US relations.
A US State Department spokesman said that Chen's decision not to stop over in Anchorage would have no ill effect on Washington's relations with Taipei.
Asked by a reporter whether Chen's rejection of an Alaska stopover would have a "chilling effect" on bilateral relations, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said: "I would expect that it would not have any effect."
Lu also denied that the spat over the choice of a US stopover location had compromised relations with the US.
"An individual incident will not have much of a negative impact," Lu said.
"Taiwan is a major economy in the international community, sharing the responsibility of maintaining peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region with other countries. The role Taiwan plays conforms to the strategic interests of the US in the Western Pacific," Lu said.
Lu said that although Chen did request a stopover in Anchorage before his departure for Paraguay, he had changed his mind and "informed the US of the decision at an appropriate time, and the US understands the situation."
also see stories:
US will still let Chen transit in Alaska
Wang defends Chen as lawmakers debate Chen's trip
News Watch: Keeping the red carpet rolled up
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say