Wed, Mar 19, 2003 page1

• Bush gives Saddam 48 hours

  FINAL HOURS The US president issued an ultimatum to the Iraqi dictator and his sons, saying they had 48 hours to step down or face devastating military might

  • AGENCIES
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  In a countdown toward war, President George W. Bush is ready to order a massive military strike against Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to surrender power by a deadline of 1am GMT ( 9am Taiwan time) tomorrow. Wary of retaliation, Bush braced Americans for possible terrorist attacks.

  Yesterday, Iraq's leadership rejected Bush's ultimatum. Iraqi television said the decision was made in a joint meeting of the Revolution Command Council -- Iraq's highest executive body -- and the leadership of the ruling Baath party. Saddam chaired the meeting, it said.

  Bush, in a prime-time speech Monday night, vowed to strike Iraq with "the full force and might" of the US military unless Saddam and his two sons leave Iraq within 48 hours. More than 250,000 American forces are poised for action in the Gulf. "The tyrant will soon be gone," the president pledged

  

  Under a full moon at 4am in the desert of western Kuwait, troops from the US Army's A Company 3rd Battalion 7th Infantry Regiment listen to US President George W. Bush live yesterday. Bush gave Iraqi President Saddam Hussein 48 hours to leave Iraq or face military action. The company has been in Kuwait for almost four months waiting for war.

  PHOTO: AP

  Having abandoned diplomacy at the stubbornly divided UN Security Council, Bush set about trying to win over an equally divided American public. A CNN-USA Today-Gallup poll found Americans just about evenly split on whether the United States should unleash military action without a new UN vote. Forty-seven percent supported such an action and 50 percent opposed it.

  In Geneva a group of international jurists said yesterday that any US-led attack on Iraq was illegal without UN Security Council backing.

  "In the absence of such Security Council authorization, no country may use force against another country, except in self-defense against armed attack," the Geneva-based International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) said.

  

  US marines from the 2nd battalion/8th MAR watch at Camp Shoup in northern Kuwait early Tuesday morning as US President George W. Bush gives a televised address from the White House in Washington, DC. Bush gave Iraqi President Saddam Hussein 48 hours to go into exile with his sons or face a US-led war.

  PHOTO: AFP

  "This rule was enshrined in the United Nations Charter in 1946 for a good reason: to prevent states from using force as they felt so inclined," said ICJ Secretary-General Louise Doswald-Beck in a statement.

  Washington and its main allies, Britain and Spain say resolution 1441, warning of "serious consequences" if Iraq did not disarm, give sufficient grounds.

  But the ICJ, a group of 60 eminent international legal experts, said resolution 1441, approved last November, was not enough, particularly as three permanent members of the Security Council -- France, Russia and China -- issued a statement at the time spelling this out.

  Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, lamented the breakdown of diplomacy, as did India, France and Mexico.

  Japan supported the US position. "It was a decision that had to be made," Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi said.

  German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder had the opposite view.

  "Does the threat posed by the Iraqi dictator justify a war, which is sure to kill thousands of innocent children, women and men? My answer in this case was and is: No," Schroeder said.

  French President Jacques Chirac said a war without the support of the UN would undermine future efforts at peaceful disarmament. France led an effort to give UN weapons inspectors in Iraq more time to uncover banned weapons.

  "To act without the legitimacy of the UN, to favor the use of force over law, is taking a heavy responsibility," Chirac said.

  At the Vatican, which is against war in Iraq, spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls said "whoever decides that all peaceful means available under international law are exhausted assumes a grave responsibility before God, his own conscience and history."

  In Tokyo, Koizumi described the ultimatum as "a very difficult decision" for Bush and reiterated his government's position that there was no need for a new UN resolution authorizing an attack.

  Japan's constitution bars its armed forces from fighting in foreign wars, but Koizumi's government reportedly was considering humanitarian missions.

  China's new premier called for "every effort" to avoid a conflict and said that UN weapons inspections must continue even as he acknowledged that the situation appeared dire.

  "The arrow has already been placed on the bow," said Wen Jiabao in a speech on his second full day as China's prime minister. "As long as there is one glimmer of hope, we will not give up our efforts for a peaceful settlement."

  In Mexico City, President Vicente Fox said that he regrets that the conflict appears headed for war, but that his nation's opposition to military action would not strain relations with the US.

  Mexico, a member of the UN Security Council, had struggled with its position on Iraq, as Fox walked a fine line between offending voters at home who overwhelmingly oppose war and antagonizing the US, which accounts for about 75 percent of Mexico's trade.

  "We maintain our belief that the diplomatic means to achieving (the goal) have not been exhausted," Fox said.

  In Indonesia, a government spokesman lamented the apparent breakdown of diplomacy. "We still believe that a solution to the crisis should be found within the UN Security Council," spokesman Marty Natalegawa said.

  Outside Jakarta's main mosque an Islamic activist made a dire warning.

  "Don't blame the Muslims if the coming war in Iraq gives birth to thousands of new Osama bin Ladens," said Habib Rizieq Shihab of the Islamic Defenders Front.

  The countdown to war has raised the prospect of a backlash by Muslims in Indonesia and Malaysia, making it difficult to crack down on radical groups.

  "I don't understand how someone can want war like Bush does," said Srisu Sapti, a maid in Jakarta. "Women and children will be killed."

  In New Zealand, Prime Minister Helen Clark said it was "highly debatable" whether a US-led strike on Iraq would be justified under international law.

  India issued a veiled criticism of US unilateralism, while Pakistan planned an emergency session of Parliament today to discuss Iraq.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Taiwan and the US preparing a ‘hellscape’ strategy

  • 2

    Two questioned over DPP legislator recall forgery

  • 3

    Former DPP aide detained in spy probe

  • 4

    Taobao fined NT$1.2m for unauthorized advertising

  • 5

    Nazi armband protest in recall petition case draws criticism