US President Donald Trump’s threat of tariffs on semiconductor chips has complicated Taiwan’s bid to remain a global powerhouse in the critical sector and stay onside with key backer Washington, analysts said.
Since taking office last month, Trump has warned of sweeping tariffs against some of his country’s biggest trade partners to push companies to shift manufacturing to the US and reduce its huge trade deficit.
The latest levies announced last week include a 25 percent, or higher, tax on imported chips, which are used in everything from smartphones to missiles.
Photo: AFP
Taiwan produces more than half of the world’s chips and nearly all of the most advanced ones, making the country essential to global supply chains.
The island’s economic importance has been described as a “Silicon Shield” against an invasion or blockade by China, which claims it as part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control.
“Taiwan’s economic security depends heavily on its leadership in semiconductor manufacturing, which it has been using strategically to maintain its importance in global supply chains,” said Julien Chaisse, an international trade expert at City University of Hong Kong.
Photo: AFP
“I think that Trump’s tariff threats make this strategy much more complicated. For instance, Taiwan could face pressure to make concessions.”
Despite strong bipartisan support in the US Congress for Taiwan, there are fears Trump might not consider the country worth defending if China attacked.
Trump has accused Taiwan of stealing the US chip industry and suggested it should pay the US for its protection.
Photo: AFP
Taiwan President William Lai (賴清德) has already vowed to boost investment in the US to reduce the trade imbalance and spend more on the island’s military, while his government is also considering increasing US natural gas imports.
GIVE IT ALL AWAY
The pressure from Trump may accelerate the shift of Taiwanese chip production to the US, said Wayne Lin of Witology Markettrend Research Institute in Taipei, but he added it would take years to build new foundries.
Taiwan’s TSMC, which is the world’s largest chipmaker, has long faced demands to move more of its production away from Taiwan.
The company has pledged to invest more than US$65 billion in three factories in Arizona, one of which began production late last year. TSMC plans a second facility in Japan and last year it broke ground on its first European plant. But there are concerns Taiwan could lose its “silicon” protection if its companies build too many factories overseas.
“It’s a very dicey situation that they’re in,” said Dan Hutcheson, a California-based senior research fellow at specialist platform TechInsights. “It’s in (Taiwan’s) interest to move some of their manufacturing (to the US), but not to give it all away, because if they give it all away, then they lose their importance.”
RECESSION THREAT
Taiwan’s government is still calculating the potential impact of Trump’s tariffs and has flagged support for affected industries.
One determining factor would be whether levies are applied only to chips shipped to the US or also on chips in finished products.
A fraction of Taiwan’s US$165 billion in chip exports last year went directly to the US, official data show.
The vast majority were sent to other countries where they were put into electronic products for export.
“A 25 percent tariff is significant, but it is unlikely to be a game changer for Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, certainly in the short term,” said Robyn Klingler-Vidra, an innovation policy expert at King’s College London.
But, she warned, the tariffs “will likely have broader global supply chain effects rather than simply curbing direct Taiwan-to-US exports.”
Tariffs could raise the price of smartphones and laptops, hurting demand for chips and potentially triggering a “recession in the semiconductor industry,” Hutcheson said.
Taiwan National Security Council chief Joseph Wu said last Thursday that US consumers would end up bearing the cost of the levies.
“I’m sure, eventually, the US will reconsider its decision,” Wu said.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
Last week the State Department made several small changes to its Web information on Taiwan. First, it removed a statement saying that the US “does not support Taiwan independence.” The current statement now reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” In 2022 the administration of Joe Biden also removed that verbiage, but after a month of pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), reinstated it. The American
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS