US President Donald Trump’s threat of tariffs on semiconductor chips has complicated Taiwan’s bid to remain a global powerhouse in the critical sector and stay onside with key backer Washington, analysts said.
Since taking office last month, Trump has warned of sweeping tariffs against some of his country’s biggest trade partners to push companies to shift manufacturing to the US and reduce its huge trade deficit.
The latest levies announced last week include a 25 percent, or higher, tax on imported chips, which are used in everything from smartphones to missiles.
Photo: AFP
Taiwan produces more than half of the world’s chips and nearly all of the most advanced ones, making the country essential to global supply chains.
The island’s economic importance has been described as a “Silicon Shield” against an invasion or blockade by China, which claims it as part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control.
“Taiwan’s economic security depends heavily on its leadership in semiconductor manufacturing, which it has been using strategically to maintain its importance in global supply chains,” said Julien Chaisse, an international trade expert at City University of Hong Kong.
Photo: AFP
“I think that Trump’s tariff threats make this strategy much more complicated. For instance, Taiwan could face pressure to make concessions.”
Despite strong bipartisan support in the US Congress for Taiwan, there are fears Trump might not consider the country worth defending if China attacked.
Trump has accused Taiwan of stealing the US chip industry and suggested it should pay the US for its protection.
Photo: AFP
Taiwan President William Lai (賴清德) has already vowed to boost investment in the US to reduce the trade imbalance and spend more on the island’s military, while his government is also considering increasing US natural gas imports.
GIVE IT ALL AWAY
The pressure from Trump may accelerate the shift of Taiwanese chip production to the US, said Wayne Lin of Witology Markettrend Research Institute in Taipei, but he added it would take years to build new foundries.
Taiwan’s TSMC, which is the world’s largest chipmaker, has long faced demands to move more of its production away from Taiwan.
The company has pledged to invest more than US$65 billion in three factories in Arizona, one of which began production late last year. TSMC plans a second facility in Japan and last year it broke ground on its first European plant. But there are concerns Taiwan could lose its “silicon” protection if its companies build too many factories overseas.
“It’s a very dicey situation that they’re in,” said Dan Hutcheson, a California-based senior research fellow at specialist platform TechInsights. “It’s in (Taiwan’s) interest to move some of their manufacturing (to the US), but not to give it all away, because if they give it all away, then they lose their importance.”
RECESSION THREAT
Taiwan’s government is still calculating the potential impact of Trump’s tariffs and has flagged support for affected industries.
One determining factor would be whether levies are applied only to chips shipped to the US or also on chips in finished products.
A fraction of Taiwan’s US$165 billion in chip exports last year went directly to the US, official data show.
The vast majority were sent to other countries where they were put into electronic products for export.
“A 25 percent tariff is significant, but it is unlikely to be a game changer for Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, certainly in the short term,” said Robyn Klingler-Vidra, an innovation policy expert at King’s College London.
But, she warned, the tariffs “will likely have broader global supply chain effects rather than simply curbing direct Taiwan-to-US exports.”
Tariffs could raise the price of smartphones and laptops, hurting demand for chips and potentially triggering a “recession in the semiconductor industry,” Hutcheson said.
Taiwan National Security Council chief Joseph Wu said last Thursday that US consumers would end up bearing the cost of the levies.
“I’m sure, eventually, the US will reconsider its decision,” Wu said.
March 24 to March 30 When Yang Bing-yi (楊秉彝) needed a name for his new cooking oil shop in 1958, he first thought of honoring his previous employer, Heng Tai Fung (恆泰豐). The owner, Wang Yi-fu (王伊夫), had taken care of him over the previous 10 years, shortly after the native of Shanxi Province arrived in Taiwan in 1948 as a penniless 21 year old. His oil supplier was called Din Mei (鼎美), so he simply combined the names. Over the next decade, Yang and his wife Lai Pen-mei (賴盆妹) built up a booming business delivering oil to shops and
The Taipei Times last week reported that the Control Yuan said it had been “left with no choice” but to ask the Constitutional Court to rule on the constitutionality of the central government budget, which left it without a budget. Lost in the outrage over the cuts to defense and to the Constitutional Court were the cuts to the Control Yuan, whose operating budget was slashed by 96 percent. It is unable even to pay its utility bills, and in the press conference it convened on the issue, said that its department directors were paying out of pocket for gasoline
On March 13 President William Lai (賴清德) gave a national security speech noting the 20th year since the passing of China’s Anti-Secession Law (反分裂國家法) in March 2005 that laid the legal groundwork for an invasion of Taiwan. That law, and other subsequent ones, are merely political theater created by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to have something to point to so they can claim “we have to do it, it is the law.” The president’s speech was somber and said: “By its actions, China already satisfies the definition of a ‘foreign hostile force’ as provided in the Anti-Infiltration Act, which unlike
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern