When Angelica Oung received the notification that her Xiaohongshu account had been blocked for violating the social media app’s code of conduct, her mind started racing.
The only picture she had posted on her account, apart from her profile headshot, was of herself wearing an inflatable polar bear suit, holding a sign saying: “I love nuclear.” What could be the problem with that, wondered Oung, a clean energy activist in Taiwan.
Was it because, at a glance, her picture looked like someone holding a placard at a protest? Was it because her costume looked a bit like the white hazmat suits worn by China’s Covid prevention workers during the pandemic, who became a widely reviled symbol of the lockdown? Or was it because in the background was Taipei 101, Taiwan’s iconic skyscraper?
Photo: AFP
Oung never found out.
“It is really opaque,” she said, “my theory is that Xiaohongshu just got slammed with so many new accounts.”
TIKTOK REFUGEES
Photo: Reuters
More than 3 million US users signed up to Xiaohongshu last week, according to Reuters. “TikTok refugees” have fled to the app, also known as RedNote, as TikTok was banned in the US on Sunday after refusing to divest from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance.
On Friday, the US Supreme Court upheld the ruling, rejecting an appeal against the ban from TikTok, which has more than 170 million American users.
Founded in 2013 as an online community focused on shopping and travel tips, the Shanghai-based Xiaohongshu has more than 300 million, predominantly female, users. It is reportedly valued at US$17 billion.
The surge of new users it is experiencing has forced Xiaohongshu’s moderators to scramble to keep the content on the platform in line with Beijing’s censorship requirements. Unlike TikTok, which is an international subsidiary and has a sister app for Chinese users, Xiaohongshu is a purely Chinese operation.
TikTok’s detractors argue that it is a danger to national security because the users’ data is at risk of being compromised by China. Some lawmakers have also raised concerns that the content on the platform is manipulated to suit Beijing’s interests.
TikTok denies both of those accusations.
But fearful of losing access to their favorite app — and perhaps just jumping on a new trend — users have defied the lawmakers’ concerns about the Chinese Communist party and flocked to another Chinese platform.
WATCHFUL EYE
Like all Chinese social media, Xiaohongshu’s content is strictly censored in line with Beijing’s laws, which prohibit content deemed counter to the government’s interests.
In 2022, a leaked internal document revealed how Xiaohongshu censored “sudden incidents” on its platform, such as discussion of natural disasters and political disturbances.
But its existing guidelines are for Chinese-language content. This week, the hashtag “Red Note is urgently recruiting English content moderators” trended on Weibo, and job listings for English-language Xiaohongshu moderators have been appearing on recruitment websites. Chinese officials have reportedly told the company to ensure that China-based users can’t see posts from US users.
While Chinese internet users are adept at finding their ways round censorship, they are also used to self-censorship, avoiding certain topics that could get them blocked. On Xiaohongshu, they have tips for the American newcomers.
“DON’T mention sensitive topics,” counseled a lifestyle influencer.
“Don’t talk about religion or politics,” said a British user in China, who said he has been on the platform for five years.
Christine Lu, an entrepreneur based in Los Angeles, was also blocked from Xiaohongshu last week. As a test of the app’s censors, she had posted pictures that featured the Tibetan flag and the Taiwan flag — both topics that are considered “sensitive” in China.
“As suspected, it’s going to be impossible to have fully self-expressed conversations with Chinese people in China via this app,” Lu said on X.
Eric Liu, a former content moderator for Weibo, said: “It is still very difficult for Chinese internet companies to conduct English censorship … censors mainly rely on the understanding of China’s political correctness that is cultivated in school and in ideological and political courses … you can’t just rely on translation software.”
Liu said Xiaohongshu’s lack of English-language capacity meant that censorship was likely to be “rough and indiscriminate … giving priority to satisfying the requirements of the authorities.”
The censorship, and banning of users, may pour cold water on the idea that the app could be a place for Chinese and US internet users to communicate and share jokes and memes.
“I do think it is an unalloyed good that people who are in countries that are geopolitically at odds, and perhaps for good reason, just get to connect with each other,” said Oung.
But there will be a “rude awakening eventually.”
Oung says: “It’s a really interesting test of whether the Chinese government feels confident enough to actually let it continue.”
Chenchen Zhang, an assistant professor at Durham University, said that the current enthusiasm for the uniting power of social media is a “surreal” throwback to the utopian ideals of the internet in the 1990s.
March 24 to March 30 When Yang Bing-yi (楊秉彝) needed a name for his new cooking oil shop in 1958, he first thought of honoring his previous employer, Heng Tai Fung (恆泰豐). The owner, Wang Yi-fu (王伊夫), had taken care of him over the previous 10 years, shortly after the native of Shanxi Province arrived in Taiwan in 1948 as a penniless 21 year old. His oil supplier was called Din Mei (鼎美), so he simply combined the names. Over the next decade, Yang and his wife Lai Pen-mei (賴盆妹) built up a booming business delivering oil to shops and
The Taipei Times last week reported that the Control Yuan said it had been “left with no choice” but to ask the Constitutional Court to rule on the constitutionality of the central government budget, which left it without a budget. Lost in the outrage over the cuts to defense and to the Constitutional Court were the cuts to the Control Yuan, whose operating budget was slashed by 96 percent. It is unable even to pay its utility bills, and in the press conference it convened on the issue, said that its department directors were paying out of pocket for gasoline
On March 13 President William Lai (賴清德) gave a national security speech noting the 20th year since the passing of China’s Anti-Secession Law (反分裂國家法) in March 2005 that laid the legal groundwork for an invasion of Taiwan. That law, and other subsequent ones, are merely political theater created by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to have something to point to so they can claim “we have to do it, it is the law.” The president’s speech was somber and said: “By its actions, China already satisfies the definition of a ‘foreign hostile force’ as provided in the Anti-Infiltration Act, which unlike
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS